Solid-extracellular fluid interaction and damage in the mechanical response of rat brain tissue under confined compression

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 138-150

  Haslach, Henry W ^a   Leahy, Lauren N ^a   Riley, Peter ^a   Gullapalli, Rao ^b   Xu, Su ^b   Hsieh, Adam H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain tissue damage; Confined compression; Extracellular fluid; Models of injury; Permeability; Rat brain; Solid fluid interaction

Indexed keywords

BRAIN TISSUE; CONFINED COMPRESSION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; RAT BRAIN; SOLID-FLUID INTERACTIONS;

BODY FLUIDS; BRAIN; COMPRESSION TESTING; DEFORMATION; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; RATS; STRAIN RATE; STRESSES;

TISSUE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN TISSUE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MECHANICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RAT; SOLID FLUID INTERACTION; TISSUE INJURY;

BRAIN TISSUE DAMAGE; CONFINED COMPRESSION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; MODELS OF INJURY; PERMEABILITY; RAT BRAIN; SOLID-FLUID INTERACTION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BRAIN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATERIALS TESTING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84884772017     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ateshian G.A., Warden H., Kim J.J., Grelsamer R.P., Mow V.C. Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 30:1157-1164.
2. Bain A.C., Meaney D.F. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2000, 122:615-622.
3. Bonneh-Barkay D., Wiley C.A. Brain extracellular matrix in neurodegeneration. Brain Pathology 2009, 19:573-585.
4. Burgin L.V., Aspden R.M. Impact testing to determine the mechanical properties of articular cartilage in isolation and on bone. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine 2008, 19(2):703-711.
5. Cheng S., Bilston L.E. Unconfined compression of white matter. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:117-124.
6. Cullen D.K., Vernekar V.N., LaPlaca M.C. Trauma-induced plasmalemma disruptions in three-dimensional neural cultures are dependent on strain modality and rate. Journal of Neurotrauma 2011, 28:2219-2233.
7. Dennerll T.J., Lamoureux P., Buxbaum R.E., Heidemann S.R. The Cytomechanics of axonal elongation and retraction. The Journal of Cell Biology 1989, 109:3073-3083.
8. Fiacco T.A., Agulhon C., McCarthy K.D. Sorting out astrocyte physiology from pharmacology. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2009, 49:151-174. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.011008.145602.
9. Fields R.D., Stevens-Graham B. New insights into Neuron-Glia communication. Science 2002, 298(5593):556-562. 10.1126/science.298.5593.556.
10. Franceschini G., Bigonia D., Regitnig P., Holzapfel G.A. Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2006, 54:2592-2620.
11. Geddes D.M., Cargill R.S., LaPlaca M.C. Mechanical stretch to neurons results in a strain rate and magnitude-dependent increase in plasma membrane permeability. Journal of Neurotrauma 2003, 20:1039-1049.
12. Gefen A., Margulies S.S. Are in vivo and situ brain tissues mechanically similar?. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37:1339-1352.
13. Hilgetag C.C., Barbas H. Role of mechanical factors in the morphology of the primate cerebral cortex. PLoS Computational Biology 2006, 2(3):e22. 146-159.
14. Holmes M.H. Finite deformation of soft tissue. analysis of a mixture model in uni-axial compression. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1986, 108:372-381.
15. Kaczmarek M., Subramaniam R.P., Neff S.R. The hydromechanics of hydrocephalus. steady-state solutions for cylindrical geometry. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 1997, 59(2):295-323.
16. Liu Q., Subhash G., Moore D.F. Loading velocity dependent permeability in agarose gel under compression. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2011, 4:974-982.
17. Miller K., Chinzei K. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue. experiment and theory. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 30:1115-1121.
18. Miller K., Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 35:483-490.
19. Mow V.C., Kuei S.C., Lai W.M., Armstrong C.G. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression. theory and experiments. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1980, 102:73-84.
20. Myer D.J., Gurkoff G.G., Lee S.M., Hovda D.A., Sofroniew M.V. Essential protective roles of reactive astrocytes in traumatic brain injury. Brain 2006, 129:2761-2772. 10.1093/brain/awl165.
21. Noyes F.R., Butler D.L., Grood E.S., Zernicke R.F., Hefzy M.S. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American 1984, 66(3):344-352.
22. Parpura V., Haydon P.G. Physiological astrocytic calcium levels stimulate glutamate release to modulate adjacent neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2000, 97(15):8629-8634. 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8629.
23. Périé D., Korda D., Iatridis J.C. Confined compression experiments on bovine nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus. sensitivity of the experiment in the determination of compressive modulus and hydraulic permeability. Journal of Biomechanics 2005, 38:2164-2171.
24. Prange M.T., Margulies S.S. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2002, 124:244-252.
25. Prevost T.P., Balakrishnan A., Suresh S., Socrate S. Biomechanics of brain tissue. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7:83-95.
26. Reulen H.J., Graham R., Spatz M., Klatzo I. Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema. Journal of Neurosurgery 1977, 46:24-35.
27. Shafieian M., Darvish K.K., Stone J.R. Changes to the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue after traumatic axonal injury. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:2136-2142.
28. Shulyakov A.V., Fernando F., Cenkowski S.S., Del Bigio M.R. Simultaneous determination of mechanical properties and physiologic parameters in living rat brain. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 8:415-425.
29. Simon B.R. Multiphase poroelastic finite element models for soft tissue structures. Applied Mechanics Reviews 1992, 45:191-218.
30. Simon B.R., Kaufman M.V., Liu J., Baldwin A.L. Porohyperelastic-transport-swelling theory, material properties and finite element models for large arteries. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1998, 35:5021-5031.
31. Soltz M.A., Ateshian G.A. Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. Journal of Biomechanics 1998, 31:927-934. (2006) Corrigendum 39, 594.
32. Strich S. Shearing of nerve fibers as a cause of brain damage due to head injury. The Lancet 1961, 1961:443-448.
33. Van Essen D.C. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 1997, 385:313-318.
34. Xu G., Bayly P.V., Taber L.A. Residual stress in the adult mouse brain. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 8:253-262.
35. Xu G., Knutsen A.K., Dikranian K., Kroenke C.D., Bayly P.V., Taber L.A. Axons pull on the brain, but tension does not drive cortical folding. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2010, 132(7):071013.