Reputation in Relationships

Management for Professionals

Volumn Part F381, Issue , 2011, Pages 75-88

  Money, Kevin ^a   Hillenbrand, Carola ^a   Downing, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cash Flow; Corporate Reputation; Good Reputation; Stakeholder Group; Structural Equation Modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884736538     PISSN: 21928096     EISSN: 2192810X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19266-1_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Badenhausen K (1998) Quantifying brand values. Corp Reput Rev 1(1/2):48-51
2. Barnett ML, Jermier JM, Laffert BA (2006) Corporate reputation: the definitional landscape. Corp Reput Rev 9(1):26-38
3. Baruch Y (1999) Response rate in academic studies - a comparative analysis. Hum Relat 52(4): 421-439
4. Bromley D (2002) Comparing corporate reputations: league tables, quotients, benchmarks, or case studies? Corp Reput Rev 5(1):35-51
5. Chin WW, Newstead PR (1999) Statistical strategies for small sample research. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Structural equation modelling. Sage, London
6. Davies G, Chun R, DaSilva RV, Roper S (2003) Corporate reputation and competitiveness. Routledge, London
7. Fiedler L, Kirchgeorg M (2007) The role concept in corporate branding and stakeholder management reconsidered: are stakeholder groups really different? Corp Reput Rev 10(3):177-188
8. Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation. Realizing value from corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
9. Fombrun C, Gardberg N (2000) Who’s top in corporate reputation. Corp Reput Rev 3(1):13-17
10. Fombrun CJ, Rindova VP (2000) The road to transparency: reputation management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In: Schultz M, Hatch MJ, Larsen MH (eds) The expressive organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Fombrun CJ, van Riel C (2004) Fame and fortune: how successful companies build winning reputations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
12. Fombrun C, Gardberg N, Sever JM (2000) The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. J Brand Manag 7(4):241-255
13. Forman S, Money A, Page MJ (1998) How reliable is reliable? A note on the estimation of Cronbach alpha. In: Proceedings of the international management conference, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 1-26
14. Freeman E (2004) Stakeholder theory and corporate responsibility: some practical questions. Key note presentation on the 3rd Annual Colloquium European Academy of Business in Society, Gent, Sept 2004
15. Gaines-Ross L (1998) Leveraging corporate equity. Corp Reput Rev 1(1/2):51-56
16. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
17. Hair JF, Babin B, Money AH, Samouel P (2003) Essentials of business research methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York
18. Lewellyn PG (2002) Corporate reputation. Focusing the zeitgeist. Bus Soc 41(4):446-455
19. MacMillan K, Downing SJ (1999) Governance and performance: Goodwill hunting. J Gen Manag 24(3):11-21
20. MacMillan K, Money K, Downing SJ (2000) Successful business relationships. J Gen Manag 26(1):69-83, Autumn
21. Money K, Hillenbrand C (2006) Using reputation measurement to create value: an analysis and integration of existing measures. J Gen Manag 32(1):1-12
22. Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Market 58:20-38
23. Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hall, New York, NY
24. Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strat Manag J 23:1077-1094
25. Sillanpää M, Wheeler D (1998) The stakeholder corporation. Financial Times Prentice Hall Publishing, London
26. Van Riel CBM (1997) Research in corporate communication. Manag Commun Q 11(2):288-310
27. Waddock S (2002) Leading corporate citizens. Vision, values, value added. McGraw-Hill, Irwin, NY
28. Wartick SL (2002) Measuring corporate reputation. Bus Soc 41(4):371-392