Techno-economic analysis and optimization models for carbon capture and storage: A survey

Energy Systems

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 315-353

  Huang, Yuping ^a   Rebennack, Steffen ^b   Zheng, Qipeng P ^a  

^a University of Central Florida   (United States)

^b Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture; Carbon sequestration; Carbon storage; CCS; CO2; CO2 pipeline network; Energy system expansion planning; Mathematical programming; Optimization models; Techno economic analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CARBON STORAGE; CCS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; PIPELINE NETWORKS; TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; POLLUTION CONTROL;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 84884727498     PISSN: 18683967     EISSN: 18683975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12667-013-0086-0     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Newell, R.: Annual energy outlook 2011: reference case. IEA, US Energy Information Administration. Technical Report (2010)
2. Tanaka, N.: CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Technical Report, International Energy Agency (2010)
3. NMA.: Status of CCS Development, December 2010 (Online). http://www.nama.org/ccs/ccsprojects. asp
4. Schach, M.-O., Schneider, R., Schramm, H., Repke, J.-U.: Techno-economic analysis of postcombustion processes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 2363-2370 (2010)
5. Figueroa, J.D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., Srivastava, R.: Advances in CO2 capture technology: the US Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 9-20 (2008)
6. Merkel, T.C., Lin, H., Wei, X., Baker, R.: Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: an opportunity for membranes. J Membrane Sci 359, 126-139 (2010)
7. Lenzen, M.: Current state of development of electricity-generating technologiesca literature review. Energies 3, 462-591 (2010)
8. Davidson, R.: Post-combustion carbon capture from coal fired plants-solvent scrubbing. Technical Report, IEA, US (2007)
9. Zhao, L., Riensche, E., Blum, L., Stolten, D.: Multi-stage gas separation membrane processes used in post-combustion capture: energetic and economic analyses. J. Membrane Sci. 359, 160-172 (2010)
10. Simmonds,M., Hurst, P.: Post combustion technologies for CO2 capture: a techno-economic overview of selected options. Carbon 44, 1-5 (2005)
11. Pehnt, M., Henkel, J.: Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 49-66 (2009)
12. Olajire, A.A.: CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications - a review. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 35, 2610-2628 (2010)
13. van Loo, S., van Elk, E.P., Versteeg, G.F.: The removal of carbon dioxide with activated solutions of methyl-diethanol-amine. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 55, 396-417 (2007)
14. Kanniche, M., Bouallou, C.: CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl. Thermal Eng. 27, 2693-2702 (2007)
15. Herzog, H., Meldon, J., Hatton, A.: Advanced post-combustion CO2 capture. Technical Report, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, MIT (2009)
16. Yang, H., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Gupta, R., Slimane, R.B., Bland, A.E., Wright, I.: Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. J. Environ. Sci. 20, 14-27 (2008)
17. Gray, M.L., Soong, T.Y., Champagne, K.J., Pennline, H., Baltrus, J.P., Khatri, R., Chuang, S.S.C., Filburn, T.: Improved immobilized carbon dioxide capture sorbents. Fuel Process 86, 1449-1455 (2005)
18. NETL: Post-combustion sorbents, US Department of Energy. Technical Report, May 2011
19. Scholes,C.A., Smith, K.H.,Kentish, S.E., Stevens, G.W.:CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes: strategies for membrane gas separation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 739-755 (2010)
20. Liang, H., Xu, Z., Si, F.: Economic analysis of amine based carbon dioxide capture system with bipressure stripper in supercritical coal-fired power plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 5, 702C-709C (2011)
21. NETL: DOE/NETL carbon dioxide capture and storage RD&D roadmap. Department of Energy, US. Technical Report (2010)
22. Page, S.C.,Williamson, A.G., Mason, I.G.: Carbon capture and storage: fundamental thermodynamics and current technology. Energy Policy 37, 3314-3324 (2009)
23. Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC): Carbon dioxide capture and transportation options in the Illinois Basin. Technical Report, National Energy Technology Laboratory, DE-FE26-03NT41994 (2004)
24. Pennlinea,H.W., Luebkea, D.R., Jonesa, K.L., Myersa,C.R., Morsib,B.I., Heintzb,Y.J., Ilconichc, J.B.: Progress in carbon dioxide capture and separation research for gasification-based power generation point sources. Fuel Process. Technol. 89, 897-907 (2008)
25. Amelio, M., Morrone, P., Gallucci, F., Basile, A.: Integrated gasification gas combined cycle plant with membrane reactors: technological and economical analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 48(10), 2680-2693 (2007)
26. Franz, J., Scherer, V.: An evaluation of CO2 selective polymeric membranes for CO2 separation in IGCC processes. J. Membrane Sci. 359, 173-183 (2010)
27. Finkenrath, M.: Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation. Technical Report, International Energy Agency (2011)
28. Grainger, D., Hägg, M.-B.: Techno-economic evaluation of a PVAm CO2-selective membrane in an IGCC power plant with CO2 capture. Fuel 87, 14-24 (2008)
29. NETL: IEP-oxy-combustion CO2 emissions control (Online). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/co2/oxy-combustion/near-zero. html
30. Dillon, D.J., Panesar, R.S., Wall, R.A., Allam, R.J., White, V., Gibbins, J., Haines, M.R.: Oxycombustion processes for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical PF and NGCC power plant. In: 7th International Conference on Green House Gas Control Technologies. Vancouver, Canada (2004)
31. Nsakala, N., Liljedahl. G.N., Turek, D.: Greenhouse gas emissions control by oxygen firing in circulating fluidized bed boilers: phase 2 - pilot scale testing and updated performance and economics for oxygen fired CFB with CO2 capture. US Department of Energy, Technical Report, DE-FC26-01NT41146 (2004)
32. Jordal, K., Anheden, M., Yan, J., Strömberg, L.: Oxyfuel combustion for coal-fired power generation with CO2 capture - opportunities and challenges. In: 7th International Conference on Green House Gas Control Technologies. Vancouver, Canada (2004)
33. Rohlfs, W., Madlener, R.: Valuation of ccs-ready coal-fired power plants: a multi-dimensional real options approach. Energy Syst. 2, 243-261 (2011)
34. US EIA: International energy outlook 2010, May 2010 (Online). http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/ieo/highlights.html
35. Zheng, Q.P., Rebennack, S., Pardalos, P., Pereira, M., Iliadis, N.: Handbook of CO2 in Power Systems, Ser. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin (2012)
36. Hashim, H., Douglas, P., Elkamel, A., Croiset, E.: Optimization model for energy planning with CO2 emission considerations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 879-890 (2005)
37. Muis, Z.A., Hashim, H., Manan, Z.A., Taha, F.M., Douglas, P.L.: Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated electricity generation schemes with CO2 reduction target. Renewable Energy 35, 2562-2570 (2010)
38. Mirzaesmaeeli, H., Elkamel, A., Douglas, P., Croiset, E.,Gupta, M.:Amulti-period optimizationmodel for energy planning with CO2 emission consideration. J. Environ. Manag. 91, 1063-1070 (2010)
39. Bai, H., Wei, J.-H.: The CO, mitigation options for the electric sector: a case study of Taiwan. Energy Policy 24(3), 221-228 (1996)
40. Mavrotas, G., Diakoulaki, D., Papayannakis, L.: An energy planning approach based on mixed 0-1 multiple objective linear programming. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 6, 231-244 (1999)
41. Tekiner, H., Coit, D.W., Felder, F.A.: Multi-period multi-objective electricity generation expansion planning problem with Monte-Carlo simulation. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 80, 1394-1405 (2010)
42. Unsihuay-Vila, C., Marangon-Lima, J., de Souza, A.Z., Perez-Arriaga, I.: Multistage expansion planning of generation and interconnections with sustainable energy development criteria: a multiobjective model. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 33, 258C-270 (2011)
43. Elkamel, A., Hashim, H., Douglas, P.L., Croiset, E.: Optimization of energy usage for fleet-wide power generating system under carbon mitigation options. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 55(12), 3168-3190 (2009)
44. Genchi, Y., Saitoh, K., Arashi, N., Yagita, H., Inaba, A.: Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction potential by using an optimization model for regional energy supply systems. In: Gale, J., Kaya, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2003. 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vols. I And II, pp. 919-924. Kyoto, 01-04 Oct (2002)
45. Noonan, R.J.G.F.: Planning electric power generation: a nonlinear mixed integer model employing benders decomposition. Manag. Sci. 23(9), 946-956 (1977)
46. Zheng, Q.P.,Wang, J., Pardalos, P.M., Guan, Y.: A decomposition approach to the two-stage stochastic unit commitment problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 01 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1092-7
47. Vandeginste, V., Piessens, K.: Pipeline design for a least-cost router application for CO2 transport in the CO2 sequestration cycle. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 571-581 (2008)
48. Hamelinck, C.N., Faaij, A.P.C., Ruijg, G.J., Jansen, D., Pagnier, H., van Bergen, F., Wolf, K.-H., Barzandji, O., Bruining, H., Schreurs, H.: Potential for CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Coalbed Methane Production in the Netherlands. NOVEM Programme, Utrecht (2001)
49. Heddle, G., Herzog, H., Klett, M.: The economics of CO2 storage. Technical Report, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, MIT (2003)
50. Bock, B., Goldburg, P.: Economic evaluation of CO2 storage and sink enhancement options. Technical Report, Electric Power Research Institute (2002)
51. Zhang, Z., Wang, G., Massarotto, P., Rudolph, V.: Optimization of pipeline transport for CO2 sequestration. Energy Convers. Manag. 47, 702-715 (2006)
52. McCoy, S.T., Rubin, E.S.: An engineering-economic model of pipeline transport of CO2 with application to carbon capture and storage. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 219-229 (2008)
53. Giovanni, E., Richards, K.R.: Determinants of the costs of carbon capture and sequestration for expanding electricity generation capacity. Energy Policy 38, 6026-6035 (2010)
54. Parfomak, P.W., Folger, P.: Pipelines for carbon dioxide CO2 control: network needs and cost uncertainties. Congressional Research Service, Technical Report RL34316 (2008)
55. Kuby, M.J., Middleton, R.S., Bielicki, J.M.: Analysis of cost savings from networking pipelines in CCS infrastructure systems. Energy Procedia 4, 2808-2815 (2011)
56. Middleton, R.S., Kuby,M.J., Bielicki, J.M.: Generating candidate networks for optimization: the CO2 capture and storage optimization problem. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. (2011, to appear)
57. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Transportation Options in the Illinois Basin, US Department of Energy, Technical Report, DE-FC26-03NT41994 (2004)
58. Doctor, R., Palmer, A., Coleman, D., Davison, J., Hendriks, C., Kaarstad, O., Ozaki, M.: Transport of CO2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Technical Report. IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage (2005)
59. Bakken, B.H., von Streng Velken, I.: Linear models for optimization of infrastructure for CO2 capture and storage. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 23(3), 824-833 (2008)
60. Aspelund, A., Gundersen, T.: A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power productionwith CO2 capture and storage c-part 4: sensitivity analysis of transport pressures and benchmarking with conventional technology for gas transport. Appl. Energy 86, 815C-825C (2009)
61. Middleton, R.S.: Optimization for Carbon Capture and Storage (2012)
62. Benson, H.Y., Ogden, J.M., (eds.)Mathematical programming techniques for designing minimum cost pipeline networks for CO2 sequestration. In: The 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Kyoto, Japan, 1-4 October (2002)
63. Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S.: Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with time, injection rate, and capacity constraints. Environ. Progress Sustain Energy (2012)
64. Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S.: Continuous-time optimization model for source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(30), 10015- 10020 (2012)
65. Weihs Fimbres, G.A.,Wiley, D.E., Ho,M.: Steady-state optimisation of ccs pipeline networks for cases with multiple emission sources and injection sites: south-east queensland case study. Energy Procedia 4, 2748-2755 (2011)
66. van Bergen, F., Gale, J., Damen, K., Wildenborg, A.: Worldwide selection of early opportunities for CO2-enhanced oil recovery and CO2-enhanced coal bed methane production. Energy 29, 1611-1621 (2004)
67. Firoozabadi, A., Cheng, P.: Prospects for subsurface CO2 sequestration. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 56(6), 1398-1405 (2010)
68. Alvarado,V.,Manrique, E.: Enhanced oil recovery: an update review. Energies 3(9), 1529-1575 (2010)
69. NETL: 2010 Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada,US, Technical Report, Department of Energy (2010)
70. IEAGHG: IEAGHG-RD&D database, December 2010 (Online). http://www.ieaghg.org/index.php?/20100109146/rdad-database.html
71. US EIA: US Crude Oil First Purchase Price, October 2011 (Online). http://www.eia.gov/oog/info/twip/twip
72. US EIA: Annual Energy Outlook 2011 With Projections to 2035, April (2011)
73. Phares, L.: Storing CO2 with enhanced oil recovery. Technical Report, US Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-402/1312/02-07-08 (2008)
74. Fleten, S.-E., Lien, K., Ljønes, K., Pagés-Bernaus, A., Aaberg, M.: Value chains for carbon storage and enhanced oil recovery: optimal investment under uncertainty. Energy Syst. 37, 457-470 (2010)
75. Milewska-Duda, J., Duda, J., Nodzeñski, A., Lakatos, J.: Absorption and adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide in hard coal and active carbon. Langumir 16, 5458-5466 (2000)
76. Do, D.D.: Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics. Imperial College Press, London (1998)
77. Arri, L., Yee, D., Morgan, W., Jeansonne, M.: Modeling coalbed methane production with binary gas sorption. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers. Casper, Wyoming (1992)
78. Law, D.H.S., van der Meer, L.G.H., Gunter,W.D.: Numerical simulator comparison study for enhanced coalbed methane recovery processes, part I: pure carbon dioxide injection. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers. Calgary, Alberta (2002)
79. Pan, Z., Connell, L.D.: Comparison of adsorption models in reservoir simulation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in coal. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 77-89 (2009)
80. US EIA: US Natural Gas Wellhead Price, October 2011 (Online). http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9190us3A.htm
81. Michael, K., Golab, A., Shulakova, V., Ennis-King, J., Allinson, G., Sharma, S., Aiken, T.: Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers: a review of the experience from existing storage operations. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 659-667 (2010)
82. Solomon, S., Carpentera, M., Flach, T.A.: Intermediate storage of carbon dioxide in geological formations: a technical perspective. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 502-510 (2008)
83. Yang, F., Bai, B., Tang, D., Shari, D.-N., David, W.: Characteristics of CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers. Petroleum Sci. 7(1), 83-92 (2010)
84. Liao, X., Shangguan, Y.: Numerical simulator comparison study for enhanced coalbed methane recovery processes, part I: pure carbon dioxide injection. In: Power and Energy Engineering Conference. Wuhan, China (2009)
85. Okwen, R.T., Stewart, M.T., Cunningham, J.A.: Analytical solution for estimating storage efficiency of geologic sequestration of CO2. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 102-107 (2010)
86. Eccles, J.K., Pratson, L., Newell, R.G., Jackson, R.B.: Physical and economic potential of geological CO2 storage in saline aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(6), 1962-1969 (2009)
87. van der Zwaan, B., Smekens, K.: CO2 capture and storage with leakage in an energy-climate model. Environ. Model. Assess. 14, 135-148 (2009)
88. Chiaramonte, L., Zoback,M.D., Friedmann, J., Stamp, V.: Seal integrity and feasibility of CO2 sequestration in the teapot dome eor pilot: geomechanical site characterization. Environ. Geol. 54, 1667-1675 (2008)
89. Qin, X.S., Huang, G.H., Zhang, H., Chakma, A.:Anintegrated decision support system formanagement of CO2 geologic storage in the weyburn field. Petroleum Sci. Technol. 26, 813-843 (2008)
90. Kopp, A., Binning, P., Johannsen, K., Helmig, R., Class, H.: A contribution to risk analysis for leakage through abandoned wells in geological CO2 storage. Adv. Water Res. 33, 867-879 (2010)
91. Zhang, Y., Oldenburg, C.M., Finsterle, S.: Percolation-theory and fuzzy rule-based probability estimation of fault leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites. Environ. Earth Sci. 59, 1447-1459 (2010)
92. Huang, Y., Zheng, Q.P., Fan, N., Aminian, K.: Optimal scheduling for enhanced coal bed methane production through CO2 injection (2013, submitted)