Evaluating recall bias in a case-crossover design estimating risk of injury related to alcohol: Data from six countries

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 512-518

  Ye, Yu ^a   Bond, Jason C ^a   Cherpitel, Cheryl J ^a   Borges, Guilherme ^b   Monteiro, Maristela ^c   Vallance, Kate ^d  

^a PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

^c PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Case crossover; Injury; Recall bias

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CASE-CROSSOVER; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; GUATEMALA; GUYANA; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NICARAGUA; PANAMA; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; RECALL BIAS; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; STATISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ALCOHOL; CASE-CROSSOVER; INJURY; RECALL BIAS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; CANADA; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; GUATEMALA; GUYANA; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NICARAGUA; PANAMA; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884710029     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12042     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effect on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:144-153.
2. Zeisser C, Stockwell TR, Chikritzhs T, Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Gardner C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and injury risk as a function of study design and recall period. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013;37 (Suppl 1):E1-8.
3. Taylor B, Irving HM, Kanteres F, etal. The more you drink, the harder you fall: a systematic review and meta-analysis of how acute alcohol consumption and injury or collision risk increase together. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010;110:108-116.
4. Gmel G, Daeppen J-B. Conceptional issues in emergency room studies and paths forward. In: Cherpitel CJ, Borges G, Giesbrecht N, etal., eds. Alcohol and injuries: emergency department studies in an international perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2009:115-131.
5. Vinson DC, Mabe N, Leonard LL, etal. Alcohol and injury. A case-crossover study. Arch Fam Med 1995;4:505-511.
6. Vinson DC, MacLure M, Reidinger C, Smith GS. A population-based case-crossover and case-control study of alcohol and the risk of injury. J Stud Alcohol 2003;64:358-366.
7. Borges G, Cherpitel CJ, Mittleman M. The risk of injury after alcohol consumption: a case-crossover study in the emergency room. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1191-1200.
8. Borges G, Cherpitel CJ, Orozco R, etal. Acute alcohol use and the risk of non-fatal injury in sixteen countries. Addiction 2006;101:993-1002.
9. Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Moskalewicz J, Swiatkiewicz G. Risk of injury: a case-crossover analysis of injured emergency service patients in Poland. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005;29:2181-2187.
10. Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Watters K, Brubacher JR. Risk of injury from alcohol and drug use in the emergency department: a case-crossover study. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31:431-438.
11. Gmel G, Kuendig H, Rehm J, Schreyer N, Daeppen J-B. Alcohol and cannabis use as risk factors for injury-a case-crossover analysis in a Swiss hospital emergency department. BMC Public Health 2009;9:40.
12. World Health Organization. WHO collaborative study on alcohol and injuries: final report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2007. Archived by WebCite® at: http://www.webcitation.org/67JsELSgQ (accessed 30 April 2012).
13. Borges G, Cherpitel CJ, Orozco R, etal. Multicentre study of acute alcohol use and non-fatal injuries: data from the WHO collaborative study on alcohol and injuries. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84:453-460.
14. Gmel G. [Editorial] Case-crossover designs for alcohol use: the potential for more than one bias. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2010;71:620-621.
15. Borges G, Cherpitel CJ, Mondragón L, Poznyak V, Peden M, Gutiérrez I. Episodic alcohol use and risk of nonfatal injury. Am J Epidemiol 2004;15:565-571.
16. Gerlich MG, Rehm J. Recall bias in case-crossover designs studying the potential influence of alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:619.
17. Gmel G, Daeppen J-B. Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: implications for case-crossover designs. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68:303-310.
18. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
19. Vinson DC, Reidinger C, Wilcosky T. Factors affecting the validity of a timeline follow-back interview. J Stud Alcohol 2003;64:733-740.
20. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003;88:879-903.
21. Rehm J, Monteiro M. Alcohol consumption and burden of disease in the Americas: implications for alcohol policy. Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2005;18:241-248.
22. Andreuccetti G, de Carvalho HB, Korcha R, Ye Y, Bond J, Cherpitel CJ. A review of emergency room studies on alcohol and injuries conducted in Latin American and the Caribbean Region. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31:737-746.
23. Ye Y, Bond J, Cherpitel CJ, Stockwell T, Macdonald S, Rehm J. Risk of injury due to alcohol: evaluating potential bias using the case-crossover usual-frequency method. Epidemiol. 2013;24:240-243.