Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q)

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 780-787

  Reissmann, D R ^a,b   Semmusch, J ^a   Farhan, D ^a   Smeets, R ^a   Heiland, M ^a   Heydecke, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Methodology; Oral surgery; Patient perception; Process related quality of care; Questionnaire development

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PERCEPTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCESS-RELATED QUALITY OF CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ASSESSMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT PERCEPTION; PROCESS-RELATED QUALITY OF CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, ORAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884704475     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12092     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743-1748.
2. Bullinger M. Assessing health related quality of life in medicine. An overview over concepts, methods and applications in international research. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20:93-101.
3. Koller M, Lorenz W. Survival of the quality of life concept. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1175-1177.
4. Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:40.
5. Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Troger M, Kloss F, Neukam FW. Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:495-502.
6. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Winkler G, Neukam FW. Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:514-521.
7. Reissmann DR, Dietze B, Vogeler M, Schmelzeisen R, Heydecke G. Impact of donor site for bone graft harvesting for dental implants on health-related and oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:698-705.
8. Ruggeri M, Dall'Agnola R. The development and use of the verona expectations for care scale (vecs) and the verona service satisfaction scale (vsss) for measuring expectations and satisfaction with community-based psychiatric services in patients, relatives and professionals. Psychol Med. 1993;23:511-523.
9. Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A, Dall'Agnola R, vanWijngaarden B, Knudsen HC, Leese M et al. Development, internal consistency and reliability of the verona service satisfaction scale-European version. Epsilon study 7. European psychiatric services: inputs linked to outcome domains and needs. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2000;177:s41-s48.
10. Schmidt J, Lamprecht F, Wittmann WW. [Satisfaction with inpatient management. Development of a questionnaire and initial validity studies]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1989;39:248-255.
11. Vahlensieck W, Gack M, Gleissner J, Hoffmann W, Liedke S, Otto U et al. [Structure and process quality of inpatient urologic rehabilitation]. Urologe A. 2005;44:51-56.
12. Young JM, Walsh J, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Shaw J. Measuring cancer care coordination: development and validation of a questionnaire for patients. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:298.
13. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2:197-207.
14. Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (care) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21:699-705.
15. Lovaglio PG. Benchmarking strategies for measuring the quality of healthcare: problems and prospects. Sci World J. 2012;2012:606154.
16. Reissmann DR, Hacker T, Farhan D, Heydecke G. The burdens in prosthetic dentistry questionnaire (bipd-q): development and validation of a patient-based measure for process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:250-259.
17. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
18. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.
20. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
21. Leake PA, Urbach DR. Measuring processes of care in general surgery: assessment of technical and nontechnical skills. Surg Innov. 2010;17:332-339.
22. Kanatas AN, Rogers SN. A systematic review of patient self-completed questionnaires suitable for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:579-590.
23. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99-103.
24. Hemphill JF. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. Am Psychol. 2003;58:78-79.