A predictive model of risk and outcomes in tissue expander reconstruction: A multivariate analysis of 9786 patients

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 513-518

  Hanwright, Philip J ^a   Davila, Armando A ^a   Mioton, Lauren M ^a   Fine, Neil A ^a   Bilimoria, Karl Y ^a   Kim, John Y S ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast reconstruction; Complication; Outcomes; Prosthesis failure; Reoperation; Risk factor; Tissue expander; Wound infection

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBESITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; STATISTICS; TIME; TISSUE EXPANSION; UNITED STATES; WOUND INFECTION;

AGE FACTORS; BODY MASS INDEX; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; OPERATIVE TIME; OVERWEIGHT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE EXPANSION; UNITED STATES; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84884701571     PISSN: 2000656X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.789436     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90.
2. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106:1014-25.
3. Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J, et al. National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit 2011. Leeds, England: The NHS Information Centre; 2011.
4. Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB, et al. Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1790-6.
5. Lin KY, Johns FR, Gibson J, et al. An outcome study of breast reconstruction: presurgical identification of risk factors for complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:586-91.
6. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1886-92.
7. Parks JR, Hammond SE, Walsh WW, et al. Human acellular dermis (ACD) vs. no-ACD in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; [Epub ahead of print] (PMID: 22691841).
8. Leyngold MM, Stutman RL, Khiabani KT, et al. Contributing variables to post mastectomy tissue expander infection. Breast J 2012;18:351-6.
9. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:467-76.
10. Disa JJ, Ad-El DD, Cohen SM, et al. The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1662-5.
11. Padubidri AN, Yetman R, Browne E. Complications of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:350-1.
12. ACS NSQIP Data User Guide. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2011.
13. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373-9.
14. Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg 2009;98:S19-27.
15. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15: 361-87.
16. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:825-31.
17. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:2098-103.
18. Chevray PM. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed. Cancer J 2008;14:223-9.
19. Stevens LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG, et al. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:619-28.
20. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: twoyear results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2265-74.
21. Kryger ZB, Dumanian GA, Howard MA. Safety issues in combined gynecologic and plastic surgical procedures. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;99:257-63.
22. Crosby MA, Dong W, Feng L, Kronowitz SJ. Effect of intraoperative saline fill volume on perioperative outcomes in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127: 1065-72.
23. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:28-41.
24. Lipa JE, Youssef AA, Kuerer HM, et al. Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1110-21.
25. Bowman CC, Lennox PA, Clugston PA, Courtemanche DJ. Breast reconstruction in older women: should age be an exclusion criterion? Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:16-22.