Effect of adherence to self-monitoring of diet and physical activity on weight loss in a technology-supported behavioral intervention

Patient Preference and Adherence

Volumn 6, Issue , 2012, Pages 221-226

  Wang, Jing ^a   Sereika, Susan M ^b,c   Chasens, Eileen R ^b   Ewing, Linda J ^d   Matthews, Judith T ^b   Burke, Lora E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Behavioral intervention; Mediation analysis; Mobile technology; Self monitoring; Weight loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NUTRITIONAL COUNSELING; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREVALENCE; SELF MONITORING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

EID: 84884694613     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1177889X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S28889     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235-241.
2. Wing RR. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In: Bray GA, Bourchard C, James WPT, editors. Handbook of Obesity: Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004: 147-167.
3. Wadden TA, Crerand CE, Brock J. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(1):151-170.
4. Baker RC, Kirschenbaum DS. Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control. Behav Ther. 1993;24:377-394.
5. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent selfmonitoring as a vital component of successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;6(3):219-224.
6. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(19):92-102.
7. Helsel DL, Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Comparison of techniques for selfmonitoring eating and exercise behaviors on weight loss in a correspondence-based intervention. Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(10):1807-1810.
8. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1172-1177.
9. Webber KH, Tate DF, Ward DS, Bowling JM. Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(3):161-167.
10. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1620-1625.
11. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833-1836.
12. Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(12):3091-3096.
13. Nothwehr F, Peterson NA. Healthy eating and exercise: strategies for weight management in the rural midwest. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(2):253-263.
14. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173-1182.
15. Acharya SD, Elci OU, Sereika SM, et al. Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:151-160.
16. Burke LE, Conroy MB, Sereika SM, et al. The effect of electronic selfmonitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19(2):338-344.
17. Burke LE, Choo J, Music E, et al. PREFER study: a randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management-rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006;27(1):34-48.
18. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173-1182.
19. Blanson Henkemans OA, van der Boog PJ, Lindenberg J, et al. An online lifestyle diary with a persuasive computer assistant providing feedback on self-management. Technol Health Care. 2009;17(3):253-267.
20. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1): 92-102.
21. Carels RA, Darby LA, Rydin S, Douglass OM, Cacciapaglia HM, O'Brien WH. The relationship between self-monitoring, outcome expectancies, difficulties with eating and exercise, and physical activity and weight loss treatment outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(3):182-190.
22. Conroy MB, Yang K, Elci EU, et al. Physical activity self-monitoring and weight loss: 6-month results of the SMART trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1568-1574.
23. Yon BA, Johnson RK, Harvey-Berino J, Gold BC, Howard AB. Personal digital assistants are comparable to traditional diaries for dietary self-monitoring during a weight loss program. J Behav Med. 2007;30(2):165-175.
24. White MA, Martin PD, Newton RL, et al. Mediators of weight loss in a family-based intervention presented over the internet. Obes Res. 2004;12(7):1050-1059.
25. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: a mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:76.