Optimization of India's electricity generation portfolio using intelligent Pareto-search genetic algorithm

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 13-20

  Vazhayil, Joy P ^a   Balasubramanian, R ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Climate change mitigation in India; Mean variance portfolio optimization; Optimal generation mix; Pareto search genetic algorithm

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GENERALIZED ALGORITHMS; MEAN-VARIANCE PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; NON-DOMINATED SORTING; OPTIMAL GENERATION; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION;

CARBON; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; COSTS; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; EMISSION CONTROL; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84884687843     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. L.M. Beard, J.B. Cardell, I. Dobson, F. Galvan, D. Hawkins, and W. Jewell Key technical challenges for the electric power industry and climate change IEEE Trans Energy Convers 25 2 2010 465 473
2. J.P. Vazhayil, and R. Balasubramanian Hierarchical multi-objective optimization of India's energy strategy portfolios for sustainable development Int J Energy Sector Manage 6 3 2012 301 320
3. J.P. Vazhayil, and R. Balasubramanian Optimization of India's Power Sector Strategies Using Weight Restricted Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis Energy Policy Journal 56 c 2013 456 465
4. T. Barker, I. Bashmakov, L. Bernstein, J.E. Bogner, P.R. Bosch, and R. Dave Technical summary B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer, Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
5. Leggett J. (Ed.) The Solar Century: the past, present and world-changing future of solar energy, GreenProfile. London; 2009.
6. J.A.P. Lopes, N. Hatziargyriou, J. Mutale, P. Djapic, and N. Jenkins Integrating distributed generation into electric power systems: a review of drivers, challenges and opportunities Electric Power Syst Res 77 2007 1189 1203 (Pubitemid 46654694)
7. S. Iniyan, L. Suganthi, and A.A. Samuel A mathematical model for renewable energy planning in developing countries Int J Power Energy Syst 27 2 2007 109 116 [ABI/INFORM Global] (Pubitemid 46999632)
8. Vazhayil JP, Balasubramanian R. A Log frame Analysis of India's Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Technology Implications. In: Sundaresan J, Sreekesh S, Ramanathan AL, Sonnenschen L, Boojh R., editors. Climate change and environment. Jodhpur, India: Scientific Publishers; 2013.
9. A.M. Isa, H. Magori, T. Niimura, and R. Yokoyama Multi-criteria generation optimal mix planning for Malaysia's additional capacity Int J Energy Environ 4 4 2010
10. P. Linares, and C. Romero A multiple criteria decision making approach for electricity planning in Spain: economic versus environmental objectives J Operat Res Soc 51 2000 736 743 [ABI/INFORM Global]
11. S. Jebaraj, S. Iniyan, L. Suganthi, and R. Goic An optimal electricity allocation model for the effective utilisation of energy sources in India with focus on biofuels Manage Environ Qual: Int J 19 4 2008
12. A. Datta, A. Ray, G. Bhattacharya, and H. Saha Green energy sources (GES) selection based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) Int J Energy Sector Manage 5 2 2011
13. SEI. Security of Supply in Ireland 2006. Sustainable Energy Ireland, 2006. .
14. Steuer RE, Qi Y, Hirschberger M. Portfolio optimization: new capabilities and future methods. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 2006; 76(2) 199-219. .
15. California Energy Commission. Comparative costs of California central station electricity generation technologies. Draft Staff Report; 2007. .
16. L.A. Greening, and S. Bernow Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making Energy Policy 32 2004 721 735 (Pubitemid 37307331)
17. Aouni B. Multi-attribute portfolio selection: new perspectives. INFOR, 47,1, ABI/INFORM Global; 2009.
18. R.E. Steuer, Y. Qi, and M. Hirschberger Portfolio selection in the presence of multiple criteria, handbook of financial engineering 2008 Springer p. 3-24
19. J. Wallenius, J.S. Dyer, P.C. Fishburn, R.E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility analysis: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead Manage Sci 54 7 2008 1336 1349
20. W.F. Sharpe Mutual fund performance J Business 39 S1 1966 119 138
21. Gilli M, Schumann E. Portfolio optimization with 'threshold accepting': a practical guide. In: Satchell S. Optimizing optimization: the next generation of optimization applications and theory. Academic Press, Elsevier; 2010.
22. M.L. Bell, B.F. Hobbs, E.M. Elliott, H. Ellis, and Z. Robinson An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated climate policy J Multi Criteria Decision Anal 10 2001 229 256 [ABI/INFORM Global]
23. Ramanathan R. Evaluating greenhouse gas control strategies using multicriteria approaches. In: Toman MA, Chakravorty U, Gupta S, editors. India and global climate change: perspectives on economics and policy from a developing country. Oxford University Press, New Delhi; 2003.
24. T.L. Saaty Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigen vector necessary Eur J Oper Res 145 2003 85 91
25. Web-HIPRE. Global decision support. Systems analysis laboratory. Helsinki University of Technology; 2003. .
26. A.A. Salo, and R.P. Hämäläinen On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6 1997 309 343
27. C. Yasar, and S. Ozyon Solution to scalarized environmental economic power dispatch problem by using genetic algorithm Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 38 1 2012 54 62
28. Jia-Chu Lee, Whei-Min Lin, Gwo-Ching Liao, and Ta-Peng Tsao Quantum genetic algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects and including wind power system Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst 33 2 2011 189 197
29. Wei-Chiang Hong, Yucheng Dong, W.Y. Zhang, Li-Yueh Chen, and B.K. Panigrahi Cyclic electric load forecasting by seasonal SVR with chaotic genetic algorithm Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44 1 2013 604 614
30. J. Torres, J.L. Guardado, F. Rivas-Dávalos, S. Maximov, and E. Melgoza A genetic algorithm based on the edge window decoder technique to optimize power distribution systems reconfiguration Electrical Power Energy Syst 45 2013 28 34
31. Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2001.
32. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, Yao X, Lutton E, Merelo JJ, Schwefel HP, editors. Parallel problem solving from nature - PPSN VI. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 849-58.
33. E. Zitzler, and L. Thiele Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3 4 1999 257 271 (Pubitemid 30544879)
34. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. TIK-Report No. 103. 2001. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK). Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich.
35. M.S. Kumari, and S. Maheswarapu Enhanced genetic algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective optimal power flow solution Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32 6 2010 736 742
36. B. Bhanu, S. Lee, and J. Ming Adaptive image segmentation using a genetic algorithm IEEE Trans, Systems, Man, Cybernetics 25 1995 1543 1567
37. Gog A, Dumitrescu D. A new search model for evolutionary algorithms. In: Proc of the International Conference of Mathematics and Informatics CTAMI. Alba Iulia, Romania; 2005.
38. Veldhuizen DAV, Lamont GB. Evolutionary computation and convergence to a Pareto front. In: Koza JR, Banzhaf W, Chellapilla K, Deb K, Dorigo M, Fogel DB, Garzon MH, Goldberg DE, Iba H, Riolo R. editors. Genetic programming 1998: Proc of the third annual conference. San Francisco (CA); p. 22-5.
39. R. Kumar, and P. Rockett Improved sampling of the Pareto-front in multiobjective genetic optimizations by steady-state evolution: a Pareto converging genetic algorithm Evol Comput 10 3 2002 283 314
40. Marti L, Garcia J, Berlanga A, Molina JM. A cumulative evidential stopping criterion for multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms. In: Procs of the 9th genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO-07). London (UK); 2007. p. 2835-42. (Pubitemid 47291082)
41. Guerrero JL, Garcia J, Marti L, Molina JM, Berlanga A. A stopping criterion based on Kalman estimation techniques with several progress indicators. Procs of the GECCO'09. Montréal Québec, Canada; 2009.
42. M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, K. Deb, and E. Zitzler Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization Evol Comput 3 2002 263 282
43. Miettinen KM. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004 [Massachusetts].
44. Planning Commission of India. Approach paper to the twelfth five year plan (2012-17); 2010. < http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/ 12appdrft/12appdrft.htm >.
45. Planning Commission of India. Mid term appraisal for eleventh five year plan, 2007-2012. Chapter 15 - Energy, 2010. < http://planningcommission.nic. in/plans/mta/11th-mta/MTA.html >.
46. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, India. Annual Report 2010-2011. .
47. Lazard. Levelized cost of energy analysis; 2009. < http://blog.cleanenergy.org/files/2009/04/lazard2009-levelizedcostofenergy.pdf >.
48. Central electricity authority, India. Cost of generation for the year 2008-09; 2010. .
49. Corporate Catalyst India. A report on Indian power and energy industry; 2007. .