How do adolescents perceive plain packaging?

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 126, Issue 1383, 2013, Pages

  Hoek, Janet ^a   Healey, Ben ^a   Gendall, Philip ^b   Edwards, Richard ^a   Jaine, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; GUIDED IMAGERY; HUMAN; LETTER; PACKAGING; PLAIN PACKAGING; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING BAN; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TOBACCO; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADVERTIZING; ATTITUDE; DRUG PACKAGING; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SMOKING; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; ATTITUDE; DRUG PACKAGING; HUMANS; SMOKING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84884685082     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (13)

1. Gendall P, Hoek J, Thomson G, et al. Young Adults' Interpretations of Tobacco Brands: Implications for Tobacco Control. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011;13(10):911-918. http://www.sfc.org.nz/documents/Gendall_etal_NTR_doi_10_1093_ntr_ntr094.pdf
2. Gendall P, Hoek J, Edwards R, McCool J. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of How Young Adults Perceive Tobacco Brands: Implications for FCTC Signatories. BMC Public Health 2012;12:796. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/796
3. Hoek J, Gendall P, Gifford H, et al. Tobacco Branding, Plain Packaging, Pictorial Warnings, and Symbolic Consumption. Qualitative Health Research. 2012;22(5):630-639. http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/12/21/1049732311431070.full.pdf
4. Wakefield M, Bayly M, Scollo M. Product retrieval time in small tobacco retail outlets before and after the Australian plain packaging policy: real-world study. Tobacco Control. 2013.
5. World Health Organization. Reducing the appeal of smoking first experiences with Australia's plain tobacco packaging law. 2013 [cited 2013 16 July]; Available from: http://www.who.int/features/2013/australia_tobacco_packaging/en/
6. Germain D, Wakefield M, Durkin S. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference? J Adolesc Health. 2010;46:385-392.
7. Hammond D, et al. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth. European Journal of Public Health. 2009;19(6):631-637.
8. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tobacco Control. 2008;17(6):416-421.
9. Hoek J, et al. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tobacco Control. 2011. 20(3):183-188.
10. Hoek J, et al. Strong public support for plain packaging of tobacco products. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2012. 36(5):405-407.
11. Rosenberg, M., et al. Public support for tobacco control policy extensions in Western Australia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(2).
12. Walsh R, et al. Is government action out-of-step with public opinion on tobacco control? Results of a New South Wales population survey. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008. 32:482-488.
13. Healey B, et al. Youth exposure to in-vehicle second-hand smoke and their smoking behaviours: trends and associations in repeated national surveys (2006-12). Tobacco Control. 2013 (in press).