Dependency modeling and model management in mechatronic design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2, Issue PARTS A AND B, 2012, Pages 1205-1216

  Qamar, Ahsan ^a   Paredis, Christiaan J J ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE DESIGN; MODELING LANGUAGES; PRODUCT DESIGN;

DEPENDENCY MODEL; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DOMAIN SPECIFIC DESIGN; LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS; LEVEL-OF-DETAIL; MECHATRONICS DESIGNS; MODEL DEPENDENCIES; MODEL MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PROPERTY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84884620987     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2012-70272     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Sanford Friedenthal, Alan Moore, and Rick Steiner, A practical guide to SysML, the systems modelling language. 2008: Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN 978-0-12-374379-4.
2. Sebastian J. I. Herzig, Ahsan Qamar, Axel Reichwein, and Christiaan J. J. Paredis. A conceptual framework for consistency management in model-based systems engineering. in 2011 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2011. 2011.
3. Tom Mens, Ragnhild Van Der Straeten, and Jocelyn Simmonds, A framework for managing consistency in evolving UML models. Software Evolution with UML and XML, 2005. Vol.: p. 1-31.
4. Tom Mens, Ragnhild Van Der Straeten, and Maja D'Hondt, Detecting and resolving model inconsistencies using transformation dependency analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006. Vol. 4199/2006: p. 200-214.
5. George A. Hazelrigg, A framework for decision based engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1998. Vol. 120: p. 653-658.
6. Stephanie C. Thompson, Rational design theory: A decision-based foundation for studying design methods, PhD. Thesis, GW. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engieering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2011, Available from: http://smartech.gatech.edu/jspui/bitstream/1853/39490/1/ thompson-stephanie-c-201105-phd.pdf.
7. Object Management Group. OMG system modeling language specification V1.2. 2010; Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.2/PDF/.
8. Eskild Tjalve, Systematic design of industrial products. 2003: Institute of Product Development, The Technical University of Denmark.
9. Hilding Elmqvist and Martin Otter. Methods for tearing systems of equations in object-oriented modeling. in European Simulation Multiconference. 1994.
10. W3C OWL Working Group. OWL web ontology language overview. 2002; Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s1.2.
11. Michael J. Pratt, Introduction to ISO 10303 - The STEP standard for product data exchange. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2001. Vol. 1(1).
12. Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language (UML) specification V2.4.1. 2011; Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/.
13. Axel Reichwein, Application-specific UML profiles for multidisciplinary product data integration, PhD. thesis, Univeristy of Stuttgart, Germany, 2011, Available from: http://elib.unistuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2012/6949/pdf/Axel- Reichwein-PhD-Thesis-2011.pdf.
14. Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF). 2011; Available from: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/.
15. Tetsuo Tomiyama, Valentina D'Amelio, Jill Urbanic, and Waguih ElMaraghy, Complexity of multi-disciplinary design. Annals of the CIRP, 2007. Vol. 56(1): p. 185-188.
16. Niklas Adamsson. Model-based development of mechatronic systems - reducing the gap between competencies? in Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering. 2004.
17. Stefanie C. Braun and Udo Lindemann. A multilayer approach for early cost estimation of mechatronical products. in International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED07). 2007.
18. Sven Buremester, Holger Giese, and Oliver Oberschelp, Hybrid UML components for the design of complex selfoptimizing mechatronic systems. Information in Control, Automation and Robotics I, 2006. Vol. 4: p. 281-288.
19. Yue Cao, Yusheng Liu, and Christiaan J. J. Paredis, Systemlevel integration of design and simulation for mechatronic systems based on SysML. Mechatronics, 2011. Vol. 21(6): p. 1063-1075.
20. Jurgen Gausemeier, Ursula Frank, Jorg Donoth, and Sascha Kahl, Specification technique for the description of selfoptimizing mechatronic systems. Research in Engineering Design, 2009. Vol. 20: p. 201-223.
21. Alexander Egyed, Automatically detecting and tracking inconsistencies in software design models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2011. Vol. 37(2): p. 188-204.
22. Chahe Adourian and Hans Vangheluwe. Consistency between geometric and dynamic views of a mechanical system. in Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. 2007. San Diego, CA, USA.
23. Jurgen Gausemeier, Wilhelm Schafer, Joel Greenyer, Sascha Kahl, Sebastain Pook, et al. Management of cross domain model consistency during the development of advanced mechatronic systems. in International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED09). 2009.
24. Peter Hehenberger, Alexander Egyed, and Klaus Zeman. Consistency checking of mechatronic design models. in Proceedings of the 2010 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2010. 2010. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
25. Mike Danilovic and Tyson R. Browning, Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of Project Management, 2007. Vol. 25(3): p. 300-314.
26. Neeraj Sangal, Ev Jordan, Vineet Sinha, and Daniel Jackson. Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture. in Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA). 2005. ACM Press.
27. David C Wynn, Seena M. T. Nair, and P. John Clarkson. The P3 platform: An approach and software for developing diagrammatic model-based methods in design research. in International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED09). 2009. Stanford, USA.
28. Phoenix Integration. ModelCenter. 2012; Available from: http://www.phoenixint.com/software/phx-modelcenter-10.php.
29. ESTECO. modeFRONTIER. 2012; Available from: http://www.esteco.com/home/ mode-frontier/mode-frontier.html.
30. Dassault Systems. Isight. Available from: http://www.simulia.com/ products/isight2.html.
31. Comet Solutions. Comet Workspace. 2012; Available from: http://cometsolutions.com/products/workspace/.
32. Martin Törngren, Hans Petter Dahle, Dagfin Brodtkorb, Jad El-khoury, Ray Chaplin, et al. Towards an industrial framework for emebdded systems tools. in HOPES Workshop at ECMFA. 2010.
33. Harald Eisenmann and Joachim Fuchs. Mutlidisciplinary approach for industrial phases in space projects. in MBSE Workshop at Incose IW2012. 2012.