Activity diagram inheritance

Business Information System 2005 - 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 435-448

  Schnieders, Arnd ^a   Puhlmann, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; INHERITANCE MECHANISMS; PROCESS MODEL; PRODUCT-LINES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 84884608306     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. W.M.P. van der Aalst, K. M. van Hee, Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.
2. W.M.P. van der Aalst, T. Basten, Life-cycle Inheritance: A Petri-net-based Approach, P. Azema, G. Balbo, editors, Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, volume 1248, pages 62-81, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
3. W.M.P. van der Aalst, Inheritance of business processes: Four problems - one solution, H. Weber, H. Ehrig, W. Reisig, editors, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Petri Net Technologies for Modelling Communication Based Systems, pp. 1-28, Berlin, Germany, 1999.
4. W.M.P. van der Aalst, Inheritance of Dynamic Behaviour in UML, D. Moldt (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Modelling of Objects, Components and Agents (MOCA 2002), DAIMI 561, 105-120, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2002.
5. M. Anastasopoulos, C. Gacek, Implementing product line variabilities, IESE Report No. 089.00/E, November 2000.
6. H. Balzert, Lehrbuch der Software-Technik: Software-Entwicklung, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg et al., 2. edition, 2000.
7. T. Basten, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Inheritance of Behavior, Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 47(2), pp. 47-145, 2001.
8. BMBF-Project PESOA (Process Family Engineering in Service-Oriented Applications) Homepage, http:// www.pesoa.de (last accessed in December 2004).
9. J. Bosch, Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach, Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England et al., 2000.
10. C. Bussler, Process Inheritance, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2348/2002, pp. 701, May 2002.
11. P. Clements, L. Northrop, Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458, 2002.
12. S. Danforth, C. Tomlinson, Type Theories and Object-Oriented Programming, ACM Computing Surveys 10(1), pp. 29-72, 1988.
13. I. Jacobson, M. Griss, P. Jonsson, Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success, Addison-Wesley Longman, Harlow, England et al., 1997.
14. OMG: Unified Modeling Language: superstructure, version 2.0, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2003-08-02 (last accessed in December 2004).
15. C. H. Pedersen, Extending ordinary inheritance schemas to include generalization, Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, pp. 407-417, 1989.
16. nd International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3080, pp. 290-305, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
17. Software Engineering Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Design Descriptions, Std 1016-1998.
18. M. Svahnberg, J. Bosch, Issues Concerning Variability in Software Product Lines, volume June of 146, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003.
19. M. Stumptner, M. Schrefl, Behavior consistent inheritance in UML, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1920/2000, pp. 527-542, July 2003.
20. A. Taivalsaari, On the notion of inheritance, ACM Comput. Surv., 28(3), pp. 438-479, 1996.
21. G. Yan, Process, Inheritance and instance modification, Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, pp. 229-238, ACM Press, 2003.