Perceived risks and benefits of surveillance colonoscopy in people undergoing surveillance for family history of colorectal cancer

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 126, Issue 1382, 2013, Pages 58-69

  Tarr, Gregory P ^a   Smith, Rebecca A ^a   John, Rhys A ^a   Crowley, Andrew P ^a   Kok, Jonathan B C ^a   Lee, Ho Nam ^a   Mustafa, Mohd Hasif B ^a   Sii, Kia M ^a   Son, Sung Eun ^a   Weaver, Lauren J ^a   Cameron, Claire ^a   Dockerty, John D ^a   Murray, Iain A ^b   Schultz, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b DUNEDIN HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RISK; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PERFORATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW;

AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84884577136     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2029-2043.
2. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Guidance on surveillance for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer. 2012. Available at: http://nzgg.org.nz/resources/187/111206%20Guidance%20on%20Surveillance%20forColorec tal%20Cancer%20FINAL.pdf Accessed 6/4/2012.
3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977-81.
4. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687-96.
5. Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:880-6.
6. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1899-1906, 1906 e1.
7. Ko CW, Riffle S, Shapiro JA, et al. Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:648-56.
8. Coombes JM, Steiner JF, Bekelman DB, Prochazka AV, Denberg TD. Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review. J Community Health. 2008;33:149-57.
9. Liljegren A, Lindgren G, Brandberg Y, et al. Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer: perceived benefits and psychological aspects of surveillance by means of regular colonoscopies. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1736-42.
10. Yim M, Butterly LF, Goodrich ME, Weiss JE, Onega TL. Perception of colonoscopy benefits: a gap in patient knowledge? J Community Health. 2012;37:719-24.
11. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut. 2004;53:277-83.
12. Fischhoff B, de Bruin W. Fifty-Fifty=50%? J Behav Dec Making. 1999;12:149-63.
13. Stark JR, Bertone-Johnson ER, Costanza ME, Stoddard AM. Factors associated with colorectal cancer risk perception: the role of polyps and family history. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:740-9.
14. Collins V, Halliday J, Warren R, Williamson R. Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clin Genet. 2000;58:460-8.
15. McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients' experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context--a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86:137-46.
16. Klemp JR, O'Dea A, Chamberlain C, Fabian CJ. Patient satisfaction of BRCA1/2 genetic testing by women at high risk for breast cancer participating in a prevention trial. Fam Cancer. 2005;4:279-84.
17. Abel G, Thompson I. What do specialists and GPs think about the introduction of colorectal cancer screening? A qualitative study. N Z Med J. 2011;124:89-95.
18. Emmons KM, Wong M, Puleo E, et al. Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun. 2004;9:127-41.
19. Santos EM, Lourenco MTC, Rossi BM. Risk perception among Brazilian individuals with high risk for colorectal cancer and colonoscopy. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2011;9:4.
20. Kim SE, Perez-Stable EJ, Wong S, et al. Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:728-34.
21. Robb KA, Miles A, Wardle J. Perceived risk of colorectal cancer: sources of risk judgments. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:694-702.
22. Domenighetti G, D'Avanzo B, Egger M, et al. Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:816-21.
23. Keller C, Siegrist M. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:483-90.