Building and evaluating a collaboratively built structured folksonomy

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 593-607

  Yoo, Donghee ^a   Choi, Keunho ^b   Suh, Yongmoo ^b   Kim, Gunwoo ^c  

^a Korea Military Academy   (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c Hanbat National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Collective intelligence; folksonomy; knowledge organization system; tag; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCES; FOLKSONOMIES; KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS; TAG; WEB 2.0;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84884573754     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551513480309     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Weller K, Peters I, Stock WG Handbook of research on social interaction technologies and collaborative software: Concepts and trends. Dumova T Fiordo R, ed. New York: Information Science Reference ; 2010: 132-146.
2. Weller K. Folksonomies and ontologies: Two new players in indexing and knowledge representation. Proceedings of online information ; 2007 London ; 2007. 108.
3. HodgeG. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: Beyond traditional authority files. CLIR Publications, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/reports/pub91/pub91.pdf (2000, accessed May 2012).
4. Weller K Knowledge representation in the social semantic web. (Knowledge and information.). Berlin: De Gruyter, Saur ; 2010:
5. Cruse DA The semantics of relationships: An interdisciplinary perspective. Green R Bean CA Myaeng SH, ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer ; 2002: 3-21.
6. Gerstl P, Pribbenow S. A conceptual theory of part-whole relations and its applications. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 1996 ; 20 (3). 305-322
7. Weller K, Stock WG. Transitive memory: Automatic concept-based query expansion using weighted transitive part-whole relations. Information - Wissenschaft and Praxis. 2008 ; 59 (3). 165-170
8. QuintarelliE. Folksonomies: Power to the people. In: Proceedings of the 1st international society for knowledge organization, Milan, http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm (2005, accessed May 2012).
9. Matthews B, Jones C, Puzoń B, Moon J, et al. An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 2010 ;: 447-465
10. MathesA. Folksonomies: Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata, http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html (2004, accessed May 2012).
11. KroskiE. The hive mind: Folksonomies and user-based tagging, http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging (2005, accessed March 2011).
12. HammondTHannayTLundBScottJ. Social bookmarking tools (I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 2005; 11, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html (accessed May 2012).
13. ShirkyC. Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags, http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology-overrated.html (2005accessed May 2012).
14. Peters I Folksonomies: Indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0. (Knowledge and information.). Berlin: De Gruyter, Saur ; 2009:
15. Brooks CH, Montanez N. Improved annotation of the blogopshere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web ; 2006 Edinburgh ; 2006. 625.
16. Angeletou S, Sabou M, Motta E. Semantically enriching folksonomies with FLOR. Proceedings of the ESWC 2008 Workshop Collective Intelligence & the Semantic Web ; 2008 Tenerife, Spain ; 2008..
17. Weinberger D. Taxonomies and tags: From trees to piles of leaves. Esther Dyson's Monthly Report. 2005 ; 23: 1-36
18. Golder S, Huberman BA. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science. 2006 ; 32: 198-208
19. Hendler J, Goldbeck J. Metcalfe's law, Web 2.0, and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics. 2008 ; 6: 14-20
20. Pan JZ, Taylor S, Thomas E. Reducing ambiguity in tagging systems with folksonomy search expansion. Proceedings of the 6th European semantic Web conference ; 2009 Heraklion ; 2009. 669.
21. Limpens F, Gandon F, Buffa M. Helping online communities to semantically enrich folksonomies. Proceedings of the web science conference ; 2010 Raleigh, NC ; 2010..
22. Spyns P, Moor A, Vandenbussche J, Meersman R. From folksologies to ontologies: How the twain meet. Proceedings of the move to meaningful internet systems 2006: CooPIS, DOA and ODBASE ; 2006 Montpellier ; 2006. 738.
23. MarchettiATesconiMRonzanoF. Semkey: A semantic collaborative tagging system. In: Proceedings of the WWW 2007 workshop tagging and metadata for social information organization, Banff, Alberta, 2007.
24. Passant A. Using ontologies to strengthen folksonomies and enrich information retrieval in weblogs. Proceedings of the international conference on weblogs and social media ; 2007 Colorado ; 2007..
25. Buffa M, Gandon F, Ereteo G, Sander P, Faron C. SweetWiki: A semantic wiki. Journal of Web Semantics. 2008 ; 6: 84-97
26. Peters I, Weller K. Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis. 2008 ; 59 (2). 100-107
27. Abbasi R, Staab S, Cimiano P. Organizing resources on tagging systems using T-ORG. Proceedings of the ESWC 2007 workshop bridging the gap between semantic web and web 2.0 ; 2007 Innsbruck ; 2007. 97.
28. Al-Khalifa HS, Davis HC. FAsTA: A folksonomy-based automatic metadata generator. Proceedings of the 2nd european conference on technology enhanced learning (EC-TEL 2007) ; 2007 Crete ; 2007. 414.
29. Specia L, Motta E. Integrating folksonomies with the semantic web. Proceedings of the 4th European semantic web conference ; 2007 Innsbruck ; 2007..
30. Cattuto C, Benz D, Hotho A, Stumme G. Semantic grounding of tag relatedness in social bookmarking systems. ; 2008 ; 2008. 615.
31. Mika P. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Journal of Web Semantics. 2007 ; 5: 5-15
32. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition. 1993 ; 5: 199-220
33. McGuinnessDLHarmelenFV. OWL web ontology language overview (W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (2004, accessed May 2012).
34. Lévy P Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Perseus ; 1999:
35. Weiss A. The power of collective intelligence. netWorker. 2005 ; 9: 16-23
36. Tapscott D, Williams AD Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin ; 2006:
37. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 ; 13: 319-340
38. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 2000 ; 46: 186-204
39. Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences. 2008 ; 39: 273-315