Divided attention: An undesirable difficulty in memory retention

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 978-988

  Gaspelin, Nicholas ^a   Ruthruff, Eric ^a   Pashler, Harold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Desirable difficulties; Divided attention; Memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84884561029     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0326-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470.
2. Anderson, C. M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1974). The effect of a concurrent task on recall from primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 107-113.
3. Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 113, 518-540. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 113. 4. 518.
4. Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 215-244). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56-64). New York, NY: Worth.
6. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bjork, R. A., & Allen, T. W. (1970). The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 567-572.
8. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus disfluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438-448. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 36. 2. 438.
10. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
11. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
12. Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236-246.
13. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 132. 3. 354.
14. Craik, F. I. M. (1970). The fate of primary memory items in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 143-148.
15. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 125, 159-80.
16. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 43. 8. 627.
17. Dudukovic, N. M., DuBrow, S., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering. Memory & Cognition, 37, 953-961. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 37. 7. 953.
18. Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129, 155-176.
19. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Bleasdale, F. A. (1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 213-216.
20. Green, C., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Attentional limits in memory retrieval-Revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1083-1098.
21. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 5. 1368.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F.
23. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: Overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138, 449-468. doi: 10. 1037/a0017350.
24. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 3. 1072.
25. Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and divided attention interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524-534.
26. Mulligan, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1067-1087. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 22. 5. 1067.
27. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413-419.
28. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Guez, J. (2000). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1461-1482.
29. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8.
30. Pashler, H., & Carrier, M. (1996). Structures, processes, and the flow of information. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (Handbook of Perception and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 3-29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
32. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01693. x.
33. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. E. (2003). Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 96-103.
34. Schmidmaier, R., Ebersbach, R., Schiller, M., Hege, I., Holzer, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2011). Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: Retesting versus restudying. Medical Education, 45, 1101-1110.
35. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
36. Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2013). Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: The attentional boost effect in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1037/a0030907.
37. Yue, C. L., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: An undesired desirable difficulty? Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1037/a0031971.
38. Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013b). When disfluency is-and is not-a desirable difficulty: The influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 229-241. doi: 10. 3758/s13421-012-0255-8.