Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the SIFT method

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 99, Issue , 2013, Pages 77-84

  Noviyanto, Ary ^a   Arymurthy, Aniati Murni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Beef cattle identification; Matching refinement; Muzzle pattern; SIFT

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOMETRICS;

BEEF CATTLE; MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS; MATCHING REFINEMENT; MUZZLE PATTERN; ORIENTATION INFORMATION; REFINEMENT TECHNIQUES; SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORMS; SIFT;

MEATS;

BIOMETRY; CATTLE; DATA ACQUISITION; ERROR ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVESTOCK FARMING; MEAT;

BOS;

EID: 84884555320     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baranov A.S., Graml R., Pirchner F., Schmid D.O. Breed differences and intra-breed genetic variability of dermatoglyphic pattern of cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 1993, 110(1-6):385-392.
2. Barry B., Gonzales-Barron U.A., McDonnell K., Butler F., Ward S. Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric approach for cattle identification. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2007, 50(3):1073-1080.
3. Corkery G.P., Gonzales-Barron U.A., Butler F., Mc Donnell K., Ward S. A preliminary investigation on face recognition as a biometric identifier of sheep. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2007, 50(1):313-320.
4. Dunstone, T., Yager, N., 2008. Biometric System and Data Analysis: Design, Evaluation, and Data Mining, first ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
5. European Union, 2002. Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities.
6. Johnston A.M., Edwards D.S. Welfare implications of identification of cattle by ear tags. Veterinary Record 1996, 138(25):612-614.
7. Lowe D.G. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. International Conference on Computer Vision 1999, 2:1150-1157.
8. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 2004, 60(2):91-110.
9. Maio D., Maltoni D., Cappelli R., Wayman J.L., Jain A.K. FVC2000: fingerprint verification competition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2002, 24(3):402-412.
10. Minagawa H., Fujimura T., Ichiyanagi M., Tanaka K. Identification of beef cattle by analyzing images of their muzzle patterns lifted on paper. Publications of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Informatics 2002, 8:596-600.
11. Mishra, S., Tomer, O.S., Kalm, E., 1995. Muzzle dermatoglyphics: a new method to identify bovines. Asian Livestock, August 1995, pp. 91-96.
12. Pennington, J.A., 2012. Tattooing of Cattle and Goats, University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture, and County Governments Cooperating.
13. Petersen W.E. The identification of the bovine by means of nose-prints. Journal of Dairy Science 1992, 5(3):249-258.
14. Poh N., Bengio S. Evidences of Equal Error Rate Reduction in Biometric Authentication Fusion 2004, IDIAP.
15. Wardrope D.D. Problems with the use of ear tags in cattle. Veterinary Record 1995, 137(26):675.