Single-scale natural SUSY

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Randall, Lisa ^a   Reece, Matthew ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Supersymmetric Effective Theories; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884539726     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)088     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. -1 of pp collision data at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [ arXiv:1202.1408 ].
2. CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at S=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [ arXiv:1202.1488 ].
3. CMS collaboration, Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at CMS, arXiv:1205.2907.
4. ATLAS collaboration, Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector, arXiv:1205.4629.
5. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ].
6. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ].
7. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [ hep-ph/9905221 ].
8. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 183 [ INSPIRE ].
9. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs Scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984)187 [ INSPIRE ].
10. H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and P. Galison, Calculation Of The Composite Higgs Mass, Phys. Lett. B 143 (1984) 152 [ INSPIRE ].
11. R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudo-Goldstone boson, Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 148 [ hep-ph/0306259 ].
12. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [ hep-ph/0412089 ].
13. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [ arXiv:1002.0900 ].
14. B.C. Regan, E.D. Commins, C.J. Schmidt and D. DeMille, New limit on the electron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 071805 INSPIRE.
15. W.C. Griffith, M.D. Swallows, T.H. Loftus, M.V. Romalis, B.R. Heckel and E.N. Fortson, Improved Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009)101601 INSPIRE ].
16. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in S=7 TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 67 [ arXiv:1109.6572 ].
17. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in all-hadronic events with missing energy, CMS-PAS-SUS-11-004 (2011).
18. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the atlas detector in S=7 TeV proton-proton collisions, ATLAS-CONF-2012-033 (2012).
19. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in the multijets + missing transverse energy final state in 7 TeV proton-proton collisions, CMS-PAS-SUS-12-011 (2012).
20. ATLAS collaboration, Search for gluinos in events with two same sign leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum, ATLAS-CONF-2012-004 (2012).
21. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in events with same-sign dileptons and b-tagged jets in pp collisions at sqrt S=7 TeV, JHEP 08 (2012) 110 [ arXiv:1205.3933 ].
22. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with a single lepton and jets using templates, CMS-PAS-SUS-11-027 (2011).
23. -1 of S=7 TeV proton-proton collisions, ATLAS-CONF-12-037 (2012).
24. ATLAS collaboration, Search for gluino-mediated scalar top and bottom quark production in final states with missing transverse energy and at least three b-jets with the ATLAS Detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-058 (2012).
25. -1 of pp collisions at S=8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-145 (2012).
26. T and b-quark multiplicity in pp collisions at 8 TeV, arXiv:1303.2985.
27. T, JHEP 01 (2013) 77 [ arXiv:1210.8115 ].
28. CMS collaboration, Search for direct top squark pair production in events with a single isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse energy at S=8 TeV, CMS-PAS-SUS-12-023 (2012).
29. -1 of ATLAS data, ATLAS-CONF-2012-166 (2012).
30. -1 of pp collisions at S=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-001 (2013).
31. -1 of proton-proton collisions at S=8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2013-007 (2013).
32. -1 of p-pcollisions at S=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-024 (2013).
33. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 35 [ arXiv:1110.6926 ].
34. C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the Third Generation and the LHC, JHEP 03 (2012) 103 [ arXiv:1110.6670 ].
35. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 125 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012)131 [ arXiv:1112.2703 ].
36. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for the LHC supersymmetry and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [ arXiv:1112.3017 ].
37. S. Heinemeyer, O. St al and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [ arXiv:1112.3026 ].
38. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [ arXiv:1112.3028 ].
39. P. Draper, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs boson for the MSSM and low-scale supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095007 [ arXiv:1112.3068 ].
40. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [ arXiv:1112.3336 ].
41. S. Dimopoulos and G.F. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with non-universal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [ hep-ph/9507282 ].
42. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, The more Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [ hep-ph/9607394 ].
43. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [ INSPIRE ].
44. R. Barbier et al., R-Parity-violating supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1 [ hep-ph/0406039 ].
45. C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, Minimal flavor violation supersymmetry: A natural theory for R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095009 [ arXiv:1111.1239 ].
46. P.W. Graham, D.E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Displaced Supersymmetry, JHEP 07 (2012) 149 [ arXiv:1204.6038 ].
47. S. Chang, C. Kilic and R. Mahbubani, New fat Higgs: Increasing the MSSM Higgs mass with natural gauge unification, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 015003 [ hep-ph/0405267 ].
48. P. Lodone, Supersymmetry Phenomenology Beyond the MSSM after 5/fb of LHC Data, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 30010 [ arXiv:1203.6227 ].
49. H.E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than m(Z)?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1815 INSPIRE.
50. R. Barbieri, M. Frigeni and F. Caravaglios, The Supersymmetric Higgs for heavy superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 167 INSPIRE ].
51. M. Carena and H.E. Haber, Higgs Boson theory and phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 50 (2003) 63 [ hep-ph/0208209 ].
52. K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi, Higgs boson mass, sparticle spectrum and the little hierarchy problem in an extended MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 055017 [ arXiv:0807.3055 ].
53. S.P. Martin, Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035004 [ arXiv:0910.2732 ].
54. P.W. Graham, A. Ismail, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Little solution to the little hierarchy problem: A vectorlike generation, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 055016 [ arXiv:0910.3020 ].
55. J.A. Casas, J. Ramón Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, The MSSM fine tuning problem: a way out, JHEP 01 (2004) 008 [ hep-ph/0310137 ].
56. H.E. Haber and M. Sher, Higgs Mass Bound In E(6) Based Supersymmetric Theories, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2206 [ INSPIRE ].
57. M. Drees, Comment on 'Higgs Boson Mass Bound In E(6) Based Supersymmetric Theories', Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2910 [ INSPIRE ].
58. L. Randall, talk at The 10th International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY02), Hamburg Germany, 17-23 June 2002, video at http://www.desy.de/susy02/.
59. P. Batra, A. Delgado, D.E. Kaplan and T.M.P. Tait, The Higgs Mass Bound in Gauge Extensions of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, JHEP 02 (2004) 043 [ hep-ph/0309149 ].
60. A. Maloney, A. Pierce and J.G. Wacker, D-terms, unification and the Higgs mass, JHEP 06 (2006) 034 [ hep-ph/0409127 ].
61. N. Craig, D. Green and A. Katz, (De)constructing a natural and flavorful supersymmetric Standard Model, JHEP 07 (2011) 045 [ arXiv:1103.3708 ].
62. M. Drees, Supersymmetric Models with Extended Higgs Sector, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989)3635 [ INSPIRE ].
63. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quiros, On Higgs boson masses in nonminimal supersymmetric standard models, Phys. Lett. B 279 (1992) 92.
64. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1 [ arXiv:0910.1785 ].
65. J. Bagger and E. Poppitz, Destabilizing divergences in supergravity-coupled supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 2380 [ hep-ph/9307317 ].
66. J. Bagger, E. Poppitz and L. Randall, Destabilizing divergences in supergravity theories at two loops, Nucl. Phys. B 445 (1995) 59 [ hep-ph/9505244 ].
67. S.A. Abel, S. Sarkar and P.L. White, On the cosmological domain wall problem for the minimally extended supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 454 (1995) 663 [ hep-ph/9506359 ].
68. C. Panagiotakopoulos, New minimal extension of MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 469 (1999) 145 [ hep-ph/9908351 ].
69. H.M. Lee et al., Discrete R symmetries for the MSSM and its singlet extensions, Nucl. Phys. B 850 (2011) 1 [ arXiv:1102.3595 ].
70. G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The fine-tuning of the generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 710 [ arXiv:1108.1284 ].
71. G.G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, The generalised NMSSM at one loop: fine tuning and phenomenology, JHEP 08 (2012) 074 [ arXiv:1205.1509 ].
72. M. Cvetič, D.A. Demir, J.R. Espinosa, L. Everett and P. Langacker, Electroweak breaking and the μ problem in supergravity models with an additional U(1), Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2861 [ hep-ph/9703317 ].
73. P. Langacker, N. Polonsky and J. Wang, Low-energy solution to the μ problem in gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 115005 [ hep-ph/9905252 ].
74. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and V.S. Rychkov, Supersymmetry without a light Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 035007 [ hep-ph/0607332 ].
75. R. Barbieri, E. Bertuzzo, M. Farina, P. Lodone and D. Pappadopulo, A non standard supersymmetric spectrum, JHEP 08 (2010) 024 [ arXiv:1004.2256 ].
76. R. Harnik, G.D. Kribs, D.T. Larson and H. Murayama, Minimal supersymmetric fat Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 015002 [ hep-ph/0311349 ].
77. A. Delgado and T.M.P. Tait, A fat Higgs with a fat top, JHEP 07 (2005) 023 [ hep-ph/0504224 ].
78. N. Craig, D. Stolarski and J. Thaler, A fat Higgs with a magnetic personality, JHEP 11 (2011)145 [ arXiv:1106.2164 ].
79. C. Csáki, Y. Shirman and J. Terning, Seiberg dual for the MSSM: Partially composite W and Z, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095011 [ arXiv:1106.3074 ].
80. C. Csáki, L. Randall and J. Terning, Light stops from Seiberg duality, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012)075009 [ arXiv:1201.1293 ].
81. A. Delgado, C. Kolda, J.P. Olson and A. de La Puente, Solving the Little Hierarchy Problem with a Singlet and Explicit μ Terms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 091802 [ arXiv:1005.1282 ].
82. A. Delgado, C. Kolda and A. de la Puente, Solving the little hierarchy problem with a light singlet and supersymmetric mass terms, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 460 [ arXiv:1111.4008 ].
83. M. Dine, N. Seiberg and S. Thomas, Higgs physics as a window beyond the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095004 [ arXiv:0707.0005 ].
84. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, The standard model partly supersymmetric, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003)085018 [ hep-ph/0302001 ].
85. R. Sundrum, SUSY splits, but then returns, JHEP 01 (2011) 062 [ arXiv:0909.5430 ].
86. K. Agashe, A. Azatov, A. Katz and D. Kim, Improving the tunings of the MSSM by adding triplets and singlet, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115024 [ arXiv:1109.2842 ].
87. J.A. Evans, J. Galloway, M.A. Luty and R.A. Tacchi, Flavor in minimal conformal technicolor, JHEP 04 (2011) 003 [ arXiv:1012.4808 ].
88. A. Azatov, J. Galloway and M.A. Luty, Superconformal Technicolor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012)041802 [ arXiv:1106.3346 ].
89. A. Azatov, J. Galloway and M.A. Luty, Superconformal technicolor: Models and phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 015018 [ arXiv:1106.4815 ].
90. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, A distorted MSSM Higgs sector from low-scale strong dynamics, JHEP 12 (2011) 069 [ arXiv:1107.4697 ].
91. J.J. Heckman, P. Kumar, C. Vafa and B. Wecht, Electroweak symmetry breaking in the DSSM, JHEP 01 (2012) 156 [ arXiv:1108.3849 ].
92. R. Kitano, M.A. Luty and Y. Nakai, Partially composite Higgs in supersymmetry, JHEP 08 (2012)111 [ arXiv:1206.4053 ].
93. N. Arkani-Hamed, M.A. Luty and J. Terning, Composite quarks and leptons from dynamical supersymmetry breaking without messengers, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015004 [ hep-ph/9712389 ].
94. M.A. Luty and J. Terning, Improved single sector supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000)075006 [ hep-ph/9812290 ].
95. S. Franco and S. Kachru, Single-sector supersymmetry breaking in supersymmetric QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095020 [ arXiv:0907.2689 ].
96. N. Craig, R. Essig, S. Franco, S. Kachru and G. Torroba, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking, with flavor, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075015 [ arXiv:0911.2467 ].
97. S. Schäfer-Nameki, C. Tamarit and G. Torroba, A hybrid Higgs, JHEP 03 (2011) 113 [ arXiv:1005.0841 ].
98. G. Larsen, Y. Nomura and H.L.L. Roberts, Supersymmetry with light stops, JHEP 06 (2012)032 [ arXiv:1202.6339 ].
99. K. Agashe and M. Graesser, Improving the fine tuning in models of low energy gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 3 [ hep-ph/9704206 ].
100. A. de Gouvêa, A. Friedland and H. Murayama, Next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model with the gauge mediation of supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5676 [ hep-ph/9711264 ].
101. D.E. Morrissey and A. Pierce, Modified Higgs boson phenomenology from gauge or gaugino mediation in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 075029 [ arXiv:0807.2259 ].
102. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Out of this world supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 557 (1999)79 [ hep-th/9810155 ].
103. G.F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, M.A. Luty and H. Murayama, Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [ hep-ph/9810442 ].
104. G.D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E.W. Kolb, S. Raby and G.G. Ross, Cosmological Problems for the Polonyi Potential, Phys. Lett. B 131 (1983) 59.
105. B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas, F. Quevedo and E. Roulet, Model-independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4D strings, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993)447 [ hep-ph/9308325 ].
106. L. Randall and S. Thomas, Solving the cosmological moduli problem with weak scale inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 449 (1995) 229 [ hep-ph/9407248 ].
107. B.S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G. Kane, J. Shao, S. Watson and P. Kumar, Non-thermal dark matter and the moduli problem in string frameworks, JHEP 06 (2008) 064 [ arXiv:0804.0863 ].
108. T. Moroi and L. Randall, Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 455 [ hep-ph/9906527 ].
109. A. de Gouvêa, T. Moroi and H. Murayama, Cosmology of supersymmetric models with low-energy gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1281 [ hep-ph/9701244 ].
110. M. Kawasaki and T. Yanagida, Constraint on cosmic density of the string moduli field in gauge-mediated supersymmetry-breaking theories, Phys. Lett. B 399 (1997) 45 [ hep-ph/9701346 ].
111. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Mitigating moduli messes in low-scale SUSY breaking, JHEP 09 (2011) 126 [ arXiv:1106.6044 ].
112. A. Pomarol and D. Tommasini, Horizontal symmetries for the supersymmetric flavor problem, Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 3 [ hep-ph/9507462 ].
113. G. Dvali and A. Pomarol, Anomalous U(1) as a Mediator of Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3728 [ hep-ph/9607383 ].
114. N. Craig, M. McCullough and J. Thaler, Flavor mediation delivers natural SUSY, JHEP 06 (2012)046 [ arXiv:1203.1622 ].
115. M. Gabella, T. Gherghetta and J. Giedt, Gravity dual and CERN LHC study of single-sector supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 055001 [ arXiv:0704.3571 ].
116. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling and N. Setzer, A natural little hierarchy for RS from accidental SUSY, JHEP 07 (2011) 011 [ arXiv:1104.3171 ].
117. R. Auzzi, A. Giveon and S.B. Gudnason, Flavor of quiver-like realizations of effective supersymmetry, JHEP 02 (2012) 069 [ arXiv:1112.6261 ].
118. N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and T. Gherghetta, Split families unified, JHEP 04 (2012) 116 [ arXiv:1203.0572 ].
119. T. Cohen, A. Hook and G. Torroba, An attractor for natural supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012)115005 [ arXiv:1204.1337 ].
120. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, Can the supersymmetric flavor problem be solved by decoupling?, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6733 [ hep-ph/9703259 ].
121. C. Tamarit, Decoupling heavy sparticles in hierarchical SUSY scenarios: Two-loop Renormalization Group equations, arXiv:1204.2292.
122. C. Tamarit, Decoupling heavy sparticles in Effective SUSY scenarios: unification, Higgs masses and tachyon bounds, JHEP 06 (2012) 80 [ arXiv:1204.2645 ].
123. C. Tamarit, Large, negative threshold contributions to light soft masses in models with effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115003 [ arXiv:1206.6140 ].
124. G.F. Giudice, M. Nardecchia and A. Romanino, Hierarchical soft terms and flavor physics, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 156 [ arXiv:0812.3610 ].
125. R. Barbieri, E. Bertuzzo, M. Farina, P. Lodone and D. Zhuridov, Minimal flavour violation with hierarchical squark masses, JHEP 12 (2010) 070 [ arXiv:1011.0730 ].
126. R. Barbieri, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, CP violation in supersymmetry with Effective Minimal Flavour Violation, JHEP 05 (2011) 049 [ arXiv:1102.0726 ].
127. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Pérez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [ arXiv:1105.2296 ].
128. J.P. Conlon, Mirror mediation, JHEP 03 (2008) 025 [ arXiv:0710.0873 ].
129. 2 -MSSM case, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2004 [ arXiv:1107.3105 ].
130. G.F. Giudice and A. Masiero, A Natural Solution to the mu Problem in Supergravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 480.
131. M.A. Luty, Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1531 [ hep-ph/9706235 ].
132. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, Counting 4π's in strongly coupled supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 412 (1997) 301 [ hep-ph/9706275 ].
133. c ) gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 444 (1995) 125 [ hep-th/9503179 ].
134. μ problem in gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 095008 [ arXiv:0708.3593 ].
135. H. Murayama, Y. Nomura and D. Poland, More visible effects of the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015005 [ arXiv:0709.0775 ].
136. J. Kersten and L. Velasco-Sevilla, Flavor constraints on scenarios with two or three heavy squark generations, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2405 [ arXiv:1207.3016 ].
137. F. Mescia and J. Virto, Natural supersymmetry and kaon mixing in view of recent results from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095004 [ arXiv:1208.0534 ].
138. R. Barbieri, G. Dvali and L.J. Hall, Predictions from a U(2) flavour symmetry in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Lett. B 377 (1996) 76 [ hep-ph/9512388 ].
139. 3 symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2289 [ arXiv:1210.4561 ].
140. M.J. Strassler, Possible Effects of a Hidden Valley on Supersymmetric Phenomenology, hep-ph/0607160.
141. N. Arkani-Hamed and N. Weiner, LHC signals for a SuperUnified theory of Dark Matter, JHEP 012 (2008) 104 [ arXiv:0810.0714 ].
142. M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J.T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Non-abelian dark sectors and their collider signatures, JHEP 04 (2009) 014 [ arXiv:0901.0283 ].
143. J. Fan, M. Reece and J.T. Ruderman, Stealth supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2011) 012 [ arXiv:1105.5135 ].
144. M.T. Grisaru, M. Roček and R. von Unge, Effective Kähler potentials, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996)415 [ hep-th/9605149 ].