A feature model for an IDE4OCL

Electronic Communications of the EASST

Volumn 36, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Chimiak Opoka, Joanna ^a   Demuth, Birgit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feature model; Integrated development environment; Modeling; OCL

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884513369     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18632122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14279/tuj.eceasst.36.536.531     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. Akehurst, S. Zschaler, G. Howells. OCL: Modularising the Language. In Ocl4All: Workshop at MoDELS 2007, Electronic Communications of the EASST. Volume 9. 2008
2. V. R. Basili, D. M.Weiss. A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 10(6):728-738, 1984
3. J. Cabot, J. Chimiak-Opoka, M. Gogolla, F. Jouault, A. Knapp. Ninth International Workshop on the Pragmatics of OCL and Other Textual Specification Languages. In Ghosh (ed.), MoDELS Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6002, pp. 256-260. Springer, 2009
4. J. Chimiak-Opoka, B. Demuth, D. Silingas, N. F. Rouquette. Requirements Analysis for an Integrated OCL Development Environment. ECEASST 24
5. J. Cabot, M. Gogolla, P. V. Gorp. Eighth International Workshop on OCL Concepts and Tools. In Chaudron (ed.), MoDELS Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Sci-ence 5421, pp. 257-262. Springer, 2008
6. J. Chimiak-Opoka. OCLLib, OCLUnit, OCLDoc: Pragmatic Extensions for the Ob-ject Constraint Language. Pp. 665-669 in [SS09]
7. L. L. Constantine. Interaction Design and Model-Driven Development. P. 377 in [SS09]
8. D. I. Chiorean, V. Petrascu, D. Petrascu. How My Favorite Tool Supporting OCL Must Look Like. ECEASST 15, 2008
9. J. Cabot, E. Teniente. Incremental integrity checking of UML/OCL conceptual schemas. J. Syst. Softw. 82(9):1459-1478, 2009. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.009
10. E. W. Dijkstra, J. N. Buxton, B. Randell (eds.). Software Engineering Techniques. 1969
11. B. Demuth, C. Wilke. Model and Object Verification by Using Dresden OCL. In Proc. of the Russian-German Workshop Innovation Information Technologies: The-ory and Practice. 2009
12. H. Hußmann, B. Demuth, F. Finger. Modular architecture for a toolset supporting OCL. Sci. Comput. Program. 44(1):51-69, 2002
13. A. Hunt, D. Thomas. The pragmatic programmer: from journeyman to master. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1999
14. S. J. Mellor. Models. Models. Models. So What? P. 1 in [SS09]
15. W. E. Riddle. The magic number eighteen plus or minus three: a study of software technology maturation. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 9(2):21-37, 1984. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1010925.1010927
16. A. Schürr, B. Selic (eds.). Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 12th International Conference, MODELS 2009, Denver, CO, USA, October 4-9, 2009. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5795. Springer, 2009
17. J. G. Suess. Sugar for OCL. Proceedings of the Sixth OCL Workshop OCL for (Meta-)Models in Multiple Application Domains (OCLApps 2006), November 2006. In: Dan Chiorean and Birgit Demuth and Martin Gogolla and Jos Warmer (Eds.): Proceedings of the Sixth OCL Workshop OCL for (Meta-)Models in Multi-ple Application Domains (OCLApps 2006)
18. C. Wilke, M. Thiele, C. Wende. Extending Variability for OCL Interpretation. ac-cepted for MoDELS 2010, 2010
19. C. Wende, N. Thieme, S. Zschaler. A Role-based Approach Towards Modular Lan-guage Engineering. In Brand et al. (eds.), Software Language Engineering, 2nd Int'l Conf. (SLE 2009), Revised Selected Papers. LNCS 5969, pp. 254-273. Springer, Mar. 2010