Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels

BMC Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Lopes, Marcos S ^a   Silva, Fabyano F ^b   Harlizius, Barbara ^a   Duijvesteijn, Naomi ^a   Lopes, Paulo S ^b   Guimarães, Simone E F ^b   Knol, Egbert F ^a  

^a TOPIGS Research Center IPG   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; Genomic selection; Linkage equilibrium; Pedigree; Relationship

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CONSANGUINITY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INBREEDING; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; POPULATION GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

ANIMALS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SWINE;

EID: 84884507560     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-92     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 1975, 31:423-447. 10.2307/2529430, 1174616.
2. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet 2006, 2(3):e41. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041, 1413498, 16565746.
3. Li CC, Horvitz DG. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet 1953, 5(2):107. 1716461, 13065259.
4. Queller DC, Goodnight KF. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 1989, 43(2):258-275.
5. Ritland K. Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 1996, 67(2):175-186.
6. Lynch M, Ritland K. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 1999, 152(4):1753-1766. 1460714, 10430599.
7. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2002, 2(4):618-620.
8. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, De Bakker PIW, Daly MJ. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Human Genet 2007, 81(3):559-575.
9. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91(11):4414-4423. 10.3168/jds.2007-0980, 18946147.
10. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. GenABEL: an R package for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(10):1294-1296. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108, 17384015.
11. Garant D, Kruuk LEB. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol Ecol 2005, 14(7):1843-1859. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x, 15910310.
12. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TIMR, Burke T, Slate JON. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Mol Ecol 2010, 19(7):1439-1451. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04554.x, 20149098.
13. Guo SW. Variation in genetic identity among relatives. Hum Hered 1996, 46(2):61-70. 10.1159/000154328, 8666414.
14. Bolormaa S, Ruvinsky A, Walkden-Brown S, Van der Werf J. DNA-based parentage verification in two Australian goat herds. Small Ruminant Res 2008, 80(1):95-100.
15. Hill WG, Salisbury BA, Webb AJ. Parentage identification using single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes: application to product tracing. J Anim Sci 2008, 86(10):2508-2517. 10.2527/jas.2007-0276, 18502887.
16. Fisher PJ, Malthus B, Walker MC, Corbett G, Spelman RJ. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms and on-farm data required for whole-herd parentage testing in dairy cattle herds. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92(1):369-374. 10.3168/jds.2008-1086, 19109294.
17. Hara K, Watabe H, Sasazaki S, Mukai F, Mannen H. Development of SNP markers for individual identification and parentage test in a Japanese Black cattle population. Anim Sci J 2010, 81(2):152-157. 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00720.x, 20438494.
18. Harlizius B, Lopes MS, Duijvesteijn N, van de Goor LHP, van Haeringen WA, Panneman H, Guimarães SEF, Merks JWM, Knol EF. A SNP set for paternal identification to reduce the costs of trait recording in commercial pig breeding. J Anim Sci 2011, 89(6):1661-1668. 10.2527/jas.2010-3347, 21239666.
19. Rolf MM, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, McKay SD, McClure MC, Northcutt SL, Kerley MS, Weaber RL. Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. BMC genetics 2010, 11(1):24. 2868785, 20403185.
20. Pinto N, Gusmão L, Amorim A. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2011, 5(1):27-32. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.01.011, 20457080.
21. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Tooker ME. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94(11):5673-5682. 10.3168/jds.2011-4500, 22032391.
22. Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11(11):800-805. 10.1038/nrg2865, 20877324.
23. Keller MC, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 2011, 189(1):237-249. 10.1534/genetics.111.130922, 3176119, 21705750.
24. Ramos AM, Crooijmans RPMA, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(8):e6524. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006524, 2716536, 19654876.
25. Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking. J Anim Breed Genet 2010, 127(3):189-198.
26. Pimentel ECG, Erbe M, Koenig S, Simianer H. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for milk production and composition traits in Holstein cattle. Frontiers in genetics 2011, 2:19. 3268574, 22303315.
27. Weir BS, Anderson AD, Hepler AB. Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nat Rev Genet 2006, 7(10):771-780. 10.1038/nrg1960, 16983373.
28. Sandler L, Hiraizumi Y, Sandler I. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. the cytogenetic basis of segregation-distortion. Genet 1959, 44(2):233-250.
29. Zhan H, Xu S. Generalized linear mixed model for segregation distortion analysis. BMC genetics 2011, 12(1):97. 3748016, 22078575.
30. Hayes BJ, Visscher P, Goddard M. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res 2009, 91(01):47-60.
31. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 2010, 42(7):565-569. 10.1038/ng.608, 3232052, 20562875.
32. Ai H, Huang L, Ren J. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(2):e56001. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056001, 3567019, 23409110.
33. Tortereau F, Servin B, Frantz L, Megens H-J, Milan D, Rohrer G, Wiedmann R, Beever J, Archibald A, Schook L. A high density recombination map of the pig reveals a correlation between sex-specific recombination and GC content. BMC Genomics 2012, 13(1):586. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-586, 3499283, 23152986.
34. Arias JA, Keehan M, Fisher P, Coppieters W, Spelman R. A high density linkage map of the bovine genome. BMC genetics 2009, 10(1):18. 2680908, 19393043.
35. Veroneze R, Lopes PS, Guimarães SEF, Silva FF, Lopes MS, Harlizius B, Knol EF. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block structure in six commercial pig lines. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:3493-3501. 10.2527/jas.2012-6052, 23736062.
36. Qanbari S, Pimentel E, Tetens J, Thaller G, Lichtner P, Sharifi A, Simianer H. The pattern of linkage disequilibrium in German Holstein cattle. Anim Genet 2010, 41(4):346-356.
37. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JH. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet Sel Evol 2012, 44(1):4. 10.1186/1297-9686-44-4, 3299588, 22321529.
38. Duijvesteijn N, Knol EF, Merks JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Groenen MAM, Bovenhuis H, Harlizius B. A genome-wide association study on androstenone levels in pigs reveals a cluster of candidate genes on chromosome 6. BMC genetics 2010, 11(1):42. 2889844, 20487517.
39. R Development Core Team R A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2011, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R Development Core Team R.
40. Jacquard A. The genetic structure of populations 1974, New York: Springer.
41. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits 1998, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
42. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 2007, 16(5):1099-1106. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x, 17305863.
43. Gutiérrez JP, Goyache F. A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. J Anim Breed Genet 2005, 122(3):172-176. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2005.00512.x, 16130468.
44. Meuwissen THE, Luo Z. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genet Sel Evol 1992, 24(4):305-313.