Challenges of designing for sociability to enhance player experience in Massively Multi-player Online Role-playing Games

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 724-734

  Christou, Georgios ^a   Law, Effie Lai Chong ^b   Zaphiris, Panayiotis ^c   Ang, Chee Siang ^d  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Game design; MMORPG; Player experience; Sociability; Social games; User experience

Indexed keywords

GAME DESIGN; MMORPG; PLAYER EXPERIENCE; SOCIABILITY; SOCIAL GAMES; USER EXPERIENCE;

COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SURVEYS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84884500367     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.754497     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bargas-Avila, J.A. and Hornbæk, K., 2011. Oldwineinnew bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011 conference on human factors in computing systems, 7-12 May 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 2689-2698.
2. Benedek, J. and Miner, T., 2002. Measuring desirability: new methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting. Proceedings of the 2002 usability professionals association conference, 8-12 July 2002, Orlando, FL.
3. Blizzard Entertainment, 2012. Diablo 3 [online]. Available from: www.diablo3.com/ [Accessed 31 July 2012].
4. Chesney, T., et al, 2009. Griefing in virtual worlds: causes, casualties and coping strategies. Information Systems Journal, 19 (6), 525-548.
5. Christou, G., 2011a. Sanctions, punishment, and game design: Designing MMORPGs for fair treatment of players. In: Proceedings of MESM 2011 - GAMEON-ARABIA, 14-16 November 2011, Amman Open University, Amman, Jordan, 144-148.
6. Christou, G., 2011b. CHI 2011 SIG: designing for the UX of sociability of MMOGs [online]. Available from: http://georgioschristou.com/?p=156 [Accessed 15 September 2011].
7. Christou, G., et al, 2011. Designing for the user experience of sociability in massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of CHI 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 7-12 May 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 879-882.
8. Clarke, D. and Duimering, P.R., 2006. How computer gamers experience the game situation: a behavioral study. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 4 (3), Article no. 6.
9. Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., and Wiedenbeck, S., 2003. Online trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (6), 737-758.
10. De Kort, Y.A.W. and Ijsselsteijn, W.A., 2008. People, places, and play: player experience in a socio-spatial context. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 6 (2), Article no. 18.
11. Drachen, A., et al, 2010. Correlation between heart rate, electro-dermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on video games (Sandbox '10), 26-30 July 2010, Los Angeles, CA. New York: ACM Press, 49-54.
12. Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R.J., and Nickell, E., 2004. Designing for sociability in massively multiplayer games: an examination of the 'third places' in SWG. In: Proceedings of the other players conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen: IT University of Copenhagen.
13. Ducheneaut, N., et al, 2006. 'Alone together?' exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006 conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 407-416. (Pubitemid 44032125)
14. Durkheim, E., 1982. Rules of sociological method. New York, NY: The Free Press.
15. Eklund, L. and Johansson, M., 2010. Social play?Astudy of social interaction in temporary group formation (PUG) in World of Warcraft. In: Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2010: experiencing games: games, play, and players, Stockholm, Sweden [online]. Available from: http://www.digra.org/dl/display- html?chid=10343.55072.pdf [Accessed 11 September 2011].
16. Fisher, S., 1995. The amusement arcade as a social space for adolescents: an empirical study. Journal of adolescence, 18, 71-86.
17. Fogg, B.J., et al, 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences (DUX '03). New York: ACM Press, 1-15.
18. Hassenzahl, M., 2004. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (4), 319-349. (Pubitemid 40226258)
19. Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N., 2006. User experience - a research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97. (Pubitemid 43065340)
20. Law, E.L.-C., et al., 2009. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009 conference on human factors in computing systems, 4-9 April 2009, Boston, MA. New York: ACM Press, 719-728.
21. McCroskey, J. and Young, T., 1981. Ethos and credibility: the construct and its measurement after three decades. The Central State Speech Journal, 32 (1), 24-34.
22. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Nacke, L.E., 2009. Affective ludology: scientific measurement of user experience in interactive entertainment. Thesis (PhD). Blekinge Institute of Technology.
24. Nielsen Wire, 2010. What Americans do online: social media and games dominate activity [online]. Available from: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/ online-mobile/what-americans-do-online-social-media-and-games-dominate-activity/ [Accessed 4 August 2010].
25. Nowak, K.L. and Rauh, C., 2006. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 11 (1), 153-178.
26. Oldenburg, R., 1989. Thegreat good place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
27. Preece, J., 2001. Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20 (5), 347-356. (Pubitemid 34917025)
28. Ravaja, N., et al, 2006. Spatial presence and emotion during video game playing: does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15 (4), 381-392. (Pubitemid 44387182)
29. Seay, A.F., et al, 2004. Project massive: a study of online gaming communities. In: Proceedings of CHI '04 conference on human factors in computing systems, 24-29 April 2004, New York, NY. New York: ACM Press, 1421-1424.
30. Simmel, G. and Hughes, E.C., 1949. The sociology of sociability. The American Journal of Sociology, 55 (3), 254-261.
31. Steinkuehler, C. and Williams, D., 2006. Where everybody knows your (screen) name: online games as 'third places'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (4), 885-909. (Pubitemid 44571153)
32. Tassi, P., 2012. Why Diablo 3's real money auction house should not be your summer job [online]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ insertcoin/2012/06/13/why-diablo-3s-real-money-auction-house-should-not-be-your- summer-job-2/ [Accessed 31 July 2012].
33. Warner, D.E. and Raiter, M., 2005. Social context in massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs): ethical questions in shared space. International Review of Information Ethics, 4 (12/2005), 46-52.
34. Weik, M.H., 2000. Computer science and communications dictionary, Vol. 2. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
35. Zaharias, P. and Papargyris, A., 2009. The gamer experience: investigating relationships between culture and usability in massively multiplayer online games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 7 (2), Article no. 26.