Stroke Journal: What is being published to advance the field?

Stroke

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2644-2649

  Saposnik, Gustavo ^a   Johnston, S Claiborne ^b   Raptis, Stavroula ^a   Ovbiagele, Bruce ^c   Fisher, Marc ^d,e  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Developing countries; Editorial; Epidemiology; Publications; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Thrombolytic therapy

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; LIPID; LIPOPROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CASE REPORT; CEREBRAL SINUS THROMBOSIS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSLIPIDEMIA; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART DISEASE; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SMOKING; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EDITORIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PUBLICATIONS; REHABILITATION; STROKE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;

ANIMALS; BIBLIOMETRICS; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84884500223     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001999     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hauser SL, Johnston SC, Ferriero DM, Lowenstein DH, Josephson SA, Messing RO, et al. Status report: The annals in 2010. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:A5-12.
2. Stewart AF, Johnston SC, Hauser SL. Manuscripts, referees, and editors. Ann Neurol. 2010;69:A9-A18.
3. Jennings C. Quality and value: The true purpose of peer review. Nature. 2006. doi:10.1038/nature05032.:http://www.nature.com. Accessed July 23, 2013.
4. Roy-Byrne PP. Peer review in early career: just say yes! J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:1602-1603.
5. Gross AF, Wiechers IR, Stern TA. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:1600-1601.
6. Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peerreview journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42:1-13.
7. Hachinski V, Donnan GA, Gorelick PB, Hacke W, Cramer SC, Kaste M, et al. Stroke: working toward a prioritized world agenda. Int J Stroke. 2010;5:238-256.
8. Adam T, Ahmad S, Bigdeli M, Ghaffar A, Røttingen JA. Trends in health policy and systems research over the past decade: still too little capacity in low-income countries. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27263.
9. Rochon PA, Mashari A, Cohen A, Misra A, Laxer D, Streiner DL, et al. Relation between randomized controlled trials published in leading general medical journals and the global burden of disease. CMAJ. 2004;170:1673-1677.
10. Isaakidis P, Swingler GH, Pienaar E, Volmink J, Ioannidis JP. Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research. BMJ. 2002;324:702.
11. Truelsen T. Stroke incidence studies in Africa. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:755-757.
12. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, Adams C, Alleyne G, Asaria P, et al; Lancet NCD Action Group; NCD Alliance. Priority actions for the noncommunicable disease crisis. Lancet. 2011;377:1438-1447.
13. Saposnik G, Del Brutto OH; Iberoamerican Society of Cerebrovascular Diseases. Stroke in South America: a systematic review of incidence, prevalence, and stroke subtypes. Stroke. 2003;34:2103-2107.
14. Sanossian N, Ohanian AG, Saver JL, Kim LI, Ovbiagele B. Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. Stroke. 2006;37:2588-2592.
15. Furie KL. Introduction for advances in stroke 2011. Stroke. 2012;43:297.
16. Grau AJ, Howard G. Advances in stroke: population studies. Stroke. 2012;43:305-307.
17. Blanco M, Castillo J. Stroke in 2012: Major advances in the treatment of stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:68-70.
18. Kaste M. Stroke: advances in thrombolysis. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:2-4.
19. Wong VS. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:1298-1301.
20. Rothwell PM, Martyn CN. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? Brain. 2000;123(pt 9):1964-1969.
21. Liebeskind DS, Kidwell CS, Sayre JW, Saver JL. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials. Neurology. 2006;67:973-979.
22. Holloway RG, Mooney CJ, Getchius TS, Edlund WS, Miyasaki JO. Invited Article: Conflicts of interest for authors of American Academy of Neurology clinical practice guidelines. Neurology. 2008;71:57-63.