Breast parenchymal pattern analysis in digital mammography: Associations between Tabár and Birads tissue compositions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8048 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2013, Pages 386-393

  He, Wenda ^a   Zwiggelaar, Reyer ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Birads; breast parenchyma; mammographic segmentation; Tab r

Indexed keywords

BI-RADS; BREAST PARENCHYMA; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HOMOGENEOUS TISSUES; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION; PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS; TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TEXTURES; TISSUE;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84884473690     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40246-3_48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Gillbert, F.J., Young, K.C., Astley, S.M., Whelehan, P., Gillan, M.G.C.: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. NHSBSP Publication No 69 (September 2010) ISBN 978-1-84463-071-4
2. He, W., Denton, E.R.E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammographic Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Binary Model Based Bayes Classifier. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds.) IWDM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7361, pp. 40-47. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
3. Tabár, L., Tot, T., Dean, P.B.: Breast Cancer: The Art And Science Of Early Detection With Mammography: Perception, Interpretation, Histopatholigic Correlation, 1st edn. Georg Thieme Verlag (December 2004)
4. Wolfe, J.N.: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5), 2486-2492 (1976)
5. Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., Lockwood, G.A., Tritchler, D.L., Yaffe, M.J.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87, 670-675 (1995)
6. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BIRADS, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston (2004)
7. Boyd, N.F., Martin, L.J., Yaffe, M.J., Minkin, S.: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Research 13(6), 223-235 (2011)
8. Sickles, E.A.:Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. American Journal of Roentgenology 188(2), 301-303 (2007)
9. Baker, J.A., Rosen, E.L., Crockett, M.M., Lo, J.Y.: Accuracy of segmentation of a commercial computer-aided detection system for mammography. Radiology 235(2), 385-390 (2005)
10. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, T.: Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24(7), 971-987 (2002)
11. Ursin, G., Astrahan, M.A., Salane, M., Parisky, Y.R., Pearce, J.G., Daniels, J.R., Pike, M.C., Spicer, D.V.: The detection of changes in mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7, 43-47 (1998)
12. Gram, I.T., Bremnes, Y., Ursin, G., Maskarinec, G., Bjurstam, N., Lund, E.: Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 7(5), R61-R845 (2005)
13. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2011)
14. He, W., Denton, E.R.E.: Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern Segmentation: A Clinical Evaluation. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine, pp. 1-4 (2010)
15. Lobbes, M.B.I., Cleutjens, J.P.M., Lima Passos, V., Frotscher, C., Lahaye, M.J., Keymeulen, K.B.M.I., Beets-Tan, R.G., Wildberger, J., Boetes, C.: Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms. Insights into Imaging 3(1), 91-99 (2012)