Contribution of national bioassessment approaches for assessing ecological water security: An AUSRIVAS case study

Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 669-687

  Nichols, Susan J ^a   Dyer, Fiona J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

biological assessment; ecological water security; river health

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884415984     PISSN: 20952201     EISSN: 2095221X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-013-0556-6     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370-396.
2. Naiman R J, Magnuson J J, Mcknight D M, Stanford J A, Karr J R. Fresh-water ecosystems and their management-a national initiative. Science, 1995, 270(5236): 584-585.
3. Vörösmarty C J, McIntyre P B, Gessner M O, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn S E, Sullivan C A, Liermann C R, Davies PM. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 2010, 467(7315): 555-561.
4. Bruins H J. Proactive contingency planning vis-à-vis declining water security in the 21st century. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2000, 8(2): 63-72.
5. Dudgeon D, Arthington A H, Gessner M O, Kawabata Z I, Knowler D J, Lévêque C, Naiman R J, Prieur-Richard A H, Soto D, StiassnyML J, Sullivan C A. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2006, 81(2): 163-182.
6. Malmqvist B, Rundle S. Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environmental Conservation, 2002, 29(2): 134-153.
7. Zhang H, Oweis T. Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region. Agricultural Water Management, 1999, 38(3): 195-211.
8. Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2005, 56(11): 1159-1168.
9. Khan S. Managing climate risks in Australia: options for water policy and irrigation management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2008, 48(3): 265-273.
10. CSIRO. Water Availability in the Murray-Darling Basin- A Report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. Canberra: CSIRO, 2008.
11. Brown L R, Halweil B. China's water shortage could shake world food security. World Watch, 1998, 11(4): 10-16.
12. Poff N L, Zimmerman J K H. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 2010, 55(1): 194-205.
13. Falkenmark M, Berntell A, Jagerskog A, Lundqvist J, Matz M, Tropp H. On the Verge of a New Water Scarcity: A Call for Good Governance and Human Ingenuity. Stockholm: SIWI Policy Brief, 2007.
14. Lautze J, Manthrithilake H. Water security: old concepts, new package, what value? Natural Resources Forum, 2012, 36(2): 76-87.
15. de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
16. Cook C, Bakker K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 2012, 22(1): 94-102.
17. Grey D, Sadoff C W. Sink or swim? water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 2007, 9(6): 545-571.
18. Swaminathan M S. Ecology and equity: key determinants of sustainable water security. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2001, 43(4): 35-44.
19. Dunn G, Cook C, Bakker K, Allen D. Water Security Guidance Document: Defining and Assessing Water Security. Vancouver, BC: UBC Program on Water Governance, 2012.
20. Global Water Partnership. Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action. Stockholm: GWP. 2000.
21. Norris R H. Environmental water: the benefits of ecological goods and services? In: Connell D, Grafton R Q, eds. Basin Futures: Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2011.
22. Boulton A J. An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 469-479.
23. Karr J R. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 221-234.
24. Norris R H, Thoms MC. What is river health? Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 197-209.
25. Bowling L C, Baker P D. Major cyanobacterial bloom in the Barwon-Darling River, Australia, in 1991, and underlying limnological conditions. Marine & Freshwater Research, 1996, 47(4): 643-657.
26. Donnelly T H, Grace M R, Hart B T. Algal blooms in the Darling-Barwon River, Australia. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1997, 99(1-4): 487-496.
27. Davies P E, Harris J H, Hillman T J, Walker K F. The sustainable rivers audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research, 2010, 61(7): 764-777.
28. Hynes H B N. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1960.
29. Patrick R. A proposed biological measure of stream conditions, based on a survey of the Conestoga Basin, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1949, 101: 277-342.
30. Reynoldson T B, Metcalfe-Smith J L. An overview of the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health using benthic invertebrates. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 1992, 1(4): 295-308.
31. Resh V H. Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 138(1-3): 131-138.
32. Bailey R C, Norris R H, Reynoldson T B. Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems Using the Reference Condition Approach. New York, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
33. Bonada N, Prat N, Resh V H, Statzner B. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology, 2006, 51(1): 495-523.
34. Metcalfe J L. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. Environmental Pollution, 1989, 60(1-2): 101-139.
35. Rosenberg DM, Resh V H. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
36. Hellawell J M. Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environment Management. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1986.
37. Downes B J, Barmuta L A, Fairweather P G, Faith D P, Keough M J, Lake P S, Mapstone B D, Quinn G P. Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
38. Green R H. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists New York: Wiley, 1979.
39. Karr J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries (Bethesda, Md.), 1981, 6(6): 21-27.
40. Plafkin J L, Barbour M T, Porter K D, Gross S K, Hughes R M. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1989.
41. Underwood A J. The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programs to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1993, 18(1): 99-116.
42. Underwood A J. On beyond baci-sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications, 1994, 4(1): 3-15.
43. Carey J M, Keough M J. The variability of estimates of variance, and its effect on power analysis in monitoring design. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2002, 74(3): 225-241.
44. Green R H. A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve molluscs of central Canada. Ecology, 1971, 52(4): 543-556.
45. Green R H. Multivariate niche analysis with temporally varying environmental factors. Ecology, 1974, 55(1): 73-83.
46. Faith D P, Dostine P L, Humphrey C L. Detection of mining impacts on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities: results of a disturbance experiment and the design of a multivariate BACIP monitoring program at Coronation Hill, Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1995, 20(1): 167-180.
47. Wright J F, Moss D, Armitage P D, Furse M T. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology, 1984, 14(3): 221-256.
48. Reynoldson T B, Norris R H, Resh V H, Day K E, Rosenberg DM. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1997, 16(4): 833-852.
49. Metzeling L, Chessman B, Hardwick R, Wong V. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 510(1-3): 39-52.
50. Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, Stribling J B. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 1999.
51. Wright J F. Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1995, 20(1): 181-197.
52. Wright J F, Furse M T, Moss D. River classification using invertebrates: RIVPACS applications. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1998, 8(4): 617-631.
53. Davies P E. Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 113-124.
54. Simpson J C, Norris R H. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe DW, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside, Cumbria: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 125-142.
55. Hawkins C P, Norris R H, Hogue J N, Feminella J W. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10(5): 1456-1477.
56. Reynoldson T B, Day K E, Pascoe T. The development of the BEAST: a predictive approach for assessing sediment quality in the North American Great Lakes. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 165-180.
57. Rosenberg D M, Reynoldson T B, Resh V H. Establishing reference conditions in the Fraser River catchment, British Columbia, Canada, using the BEAST. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside, UK: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 181-194.
58. Davies P E. River Bioassessment Manual Version 1. 0 National River Processes and Management Program Monitoring River Health Initiative. 1994. Available online at http://www. environment. gov. au/water/publications/environmental/rivers/nrhp/bioassess. html (accessed May 20, 2013).
59. Yates A G, Bailey R C. Selecting objectively defined reference sites for stream bioassessment programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 170(1-4): 129-140.
60. Water Framework Directive. Water framework directive of the European parliament and the council, of 23 October 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2000, L327: 1-72.
61. Feio M J, Poquet J M. Predictive models for freshwater biological assessment: statistical approaches, biological elements and the Iberian Peninsula Experience: a review. International Review of Hydrobiology, 2011, 96(4): 321-346.
62. Poquet J M, Alba-Tercedor J, Punti T, Sanchez-Montoya M D, Robles S, Alvarez M, Zamora-Munoz C, Sainz-Cantero C E, Vidal-Abarca M R, Suarez ML, Toro M, Pujante AM, Rieradevall M, Prat N. The MEDiterranean Prediction And Classification System (MEDPACS): an implementation of the RIVPACS/AUSRIVAS predictive approach for assessing Mediterranean aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia, 2009, 623(1): 153-171.
63. Parsons M, Norris R H. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwater Biology, 1996, 36(2): 419-434.
64. Marchant R, Hirst A, Norris R H, Butcher R, Metzeling L, Tiller D. Classification and prediction of macroinvertebrate assemblages from running waters in Victoria, Australia. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1997, 16(3): 664-681.
65. Lamche G, Fukuda Y. Comparison of Genus and Family AUSRIVAS Models for the Darwin-Daly region and relation to Land Use. Report 01/2008D. Darwin: Aquatic Health Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts, 2008.
66. Lenat D R, Resh V H. Taxonomy and stream ecology - The benefits of genus- and species-level identifications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2001, 20(2): 287-298.
67. Heino J, Soininen J. Are higher taxa adequate surrogates for species-level assemblage patterns and species richness in stream organisms? Biological Conservation, 2007, 137(1): 78-89.
68. Chessman B, Williams S, Besley C. Bioassessment of streams with macroinvertebrates: effect of sampled habitat and taxonomic resolution. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2007, 26(3): 546-565.
69. Bailey R C, Norris R H, Reynoldson T B. Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2001, 20(2): 280-286.
70. Reynoldson T B, Rosenberg D M, Resh V H. Comparison of models predicting invertebrate assemblages for biomonitoring in the Fraser River catchment, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2001, 58(7): 1395-1410.
71. Coysh J, Nichols S, Ransom G, Simpson J, Norris R, Barmuta L, Chessman B. AUSRIVAS Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment: Predictive Modelling Manual. Canberra: CRC for Freshwater Ecology, 2000 ISBN 0-9751642-05.
72. van Sickle J, Huff D D, Hawkins C P. Selecting discriminant function models for predicting the expected richness of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology, 2006, 51(2): 359-372.
73. Mazor R D, Reynoldson T B, Rosenberg D M, Resh V H. Effects of biotic assemblage, classification, and assessment method on bioassessment performance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2006, 63(2): 394-411.
74. Clarke R T, Murphy J F. Effects of locally rare taxa on the precision and sensitivity of RIVPACS bioassessment of freshwaters. Freshwater Biology, 2006, 51(10): 1924-1940.
75. Marchant R. Do rare species have any place in multivariate analysis for bioassessment? Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2002, 21(2): 311-313.
76. Ostermiller J D, Hawkins C P. Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACStype models. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2004, 23(2): 363-382.
77. van Sickle J, Larsen D P, Hawkins C P. Exclusion of rare taxa affects performance of the O/E index in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2007, 26(2): 319-331.
78. Whittington J. Assessing River Condition Using Existing Data: a Guide for Catchment Managers. Canberra: ACT Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, 2002.
79. O'Connor R, Nichols S. Framework to Set Targets for Healthy Working River Systems Version 1. 1, Project no. 156 January 2006. Canberra: eWater CRC, 2006.
80. Metzeling L, Robinson D, Perriss S, Marchant R. Temporal persistence of benthic invertebrate communities in south-eastern Australian streams: taxonomic resolution and implications for the use of predictive models. Marine & Freshwater Research, 2002, 53(8): 1223-1234.
81. Nichols S J, Robinson W A, Norris R H. Using the reference condition maintains the integrity of a bioassessment program in a changing climate. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010, 29(4): 1459-1471.
82. Reynoldson T B. Relative significance of temporal and spatial variation in characterizing reference conditions for the RCA. In Proceedings of the North American Benthological Society Annual Meeting, 2006, Anchorage: Alaska. Available online at https://www. freshwater-science. org/Other-Publications/NABStracts/2006/255. aspx (accessed July 5, 2013).
83. Sylvestre S, Reynoldson T B. Temporal variation of benthic invertebrate monitoring data in British Columbia, presented at 54th North American Benthological Society Annual Meeting, 2006, Anchorage: Alaska. Available online at http://www. freshwaterscience. org/other-publications/nabstracts/2006/256. aspx (accessed July 5, 2013).
84. Reynoldson T B, Wright J F. The reference condition: problems and solutions. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters. RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 293-304.
85. Tannenbaum L V, Bazar M, Hawkins M S, Cornaby B W, Ferguson E A, Chantelle Carroll L, Ryan P F. Rodent sperm analysis in field-based ecological risk assessment: pilot study at Ravenna army ammunition plant, Ravenna, Ohio. Environmental Pollution, 2003, 123(1): 21-29.
86. Davies P E. AusRivAS: Its Utility, Possible Future Governance and Funding Arrangements. Report to Department of the Environment and Water Resources. Hobart: Freshwater Systems, 2007.
87. Stoddard J L, Larsen D P, Hawkins C P, Johnson R K, Norris R H. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications, 2006, 16(4): 1267-1276.
88. Hawkins C P, Olson J R, Hill R A. The reference condition: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010, 29(1): 312-343.
89. Rose P, Metzeling L, Catzikiris S. Can macroinvertebrate rapid bioassessment methods be used to assess river health during drought in south eastern Australian streams? Freshwater Biology, 2008, 53(12): 2626-2638.
90. Chessman B C, Jones H A, Searle N K, Growns I O, Pearson M R. Assessing effects of flow alteration on macroinvertebrate assemblages in Australian dryland rivers. Freshwater Biology, 2010, 55(8): 1780-1800.
91. Bailey R C, Kennedy M G, Dervish M Z, Taylor R M. Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference condition approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams. Freshwater Biology, 1998, 39(4): 765-774.
92. Bailey R C, Scrimgeour G, Cote D, Kehler D, Linke S, Cao Y. Bioassessment of stream ecosystems enduring a decade of simulated degradation: lessons for the real world. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2012, 69(4): 784-796.
93. Cao Y, Hawkins C P. Simulating biological impairment to evaluate the accuracy of ecological indicators. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 42(5): 954-965.
94. Ladson A R, White L J, Doolan J A, Finlayson B L, Hart B T, Lake P S, Tilleard J W. Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 453-468.
95. Muxika I, Borja A, Bald J. Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2007, 55(1-6): 16-29.
96. Thoms M C, Ogden R W, Reid M A. Establishing the condition of lowland floodplain rivers: a palaeo-ecological approach. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 407-423.
97. Norris R H, Linke S, Prosser I, Young W J, Liston P, Bauer N, Sloane N, Dyer F, Thoms M. Very-broad-scale assessment of human impacts on river condition. Freshwater Biology, 2007, 52(5): 959-976.
98. Chessman B C, Royal M J. Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2004, 23(3): 599-615.
99. Norris R H, Georges A. Design and analysis for assessment of water quality. In: De Deckker P, Williams W D, eds. Limnology in Australia. Dordrecht: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne and Junk Publishers, 1986, 555-572.
100. Norris R H, Norris K R. The need for biological assessment of water-quality - Australian perspective. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1995, 20(1): 1-6.
101. ANZECC, ARMCANZ. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. National water quality management strategy. Canberra: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, 2000.
102. Hynes H B N. Edgardo Baldi Memorial Lecture. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 1975, 19: 1-15.
103. Southwood T R E. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology, 1977, 46(2): 336-365.
104. Townsend C R, Hildrew A G. Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology, 1994, 31(3): 265-275.
105. Hutchinson G E. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1957, 22(0): 415-427.
106. AUSRIVAS. Australian River Assessment System Webpage. Canberra: eWaterCRC, 2012. Available online at http://ausrivas. ewater. com. au/index. php/home (accessed July 5, 2013).
107. Chessman B C. Rapid assessment of rivers using macro-invertebrates-a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a Biotic Index. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1995, 20(1): 122-129.
108. John J. Assessment of river health in Australia by diatom assemblages-a review. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 2004, 33(2): 95-104.
109. Davies P E, Harris J H, Hillman T J, Walker K F. SRA Report 1: A Report on the Ecological Health of Rivers in the Murray-Darling Basin, 2004-2007. Canberra: MDBC, 2008.
110. Fellows C S, Clapcott J E, Udy J W, Bunn S E, Harch B D, Smith M J, Davies P M. Benthic metabolism as an indicator of stream ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572(1): 71-87.
111. Boulton A J, Quinn J M. A simple and versatile technique for assessing cellulose decomposition potential in floodplain and riverine sediments. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie, 2000, 150(1): 133-151.
112. Gessner M O, Chauvet E. A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional stream integrity. Ecological Applications, 2002, 12(2): 498-510.
113. Davies N M, Norris R H, Thoms M C. Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large-scale catchment characteristics. Freshwater Biology, 2000, 45(3): 343-369.
114. Mugodo J, Kennard M, Liston P, Nichols S, Linke S, Norris R H, Lintermans M. Local stream habitat variables predicted from catchment scale characteristics are useful for predicting fish distribution. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572(1): 59-70.
115. Turak E, Flack L K, Norris R H, Simpson J, Waddell N. Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 283-298.
116. Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside, Cumbria: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000.
117. Humphrey C L, Storey A W, Thurtell L. AUSRIVAS: operator sample processing errors and temporal variability-implications for model sensitivity. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 143-163.
118. Clarke R. Uncertainty in estimates of biological quality based on RIVPACS. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters; RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside, Cumbria: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 41-54.
119. Nichols S J, Norris R H. River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory subsampling of invertebrates for bioassessment. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572(1): 195-213.
120. Nichols S J, Robinson W A, Norris R H. Sample variability influences on the precision of predictive bioassessment. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572(1): 215-233.
121. Gillies C L, Hose G C, Turak E. What do qualitative rapid assessment collections of macroinvertebrates represent? a comparison with extensive quantitative sampling. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 149(1-4): 99-112.
122. Halse S A, Scanlon M D, Cocking J S, Smith M J, Kay W R. Factors affecting river health and its assessment over broad geographic ranges: the Western Australian experience. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 134(1-3): 161-175.
123. Hose G, Turak E, Waddell N. Reproducibility of AUSRIVAS rapid bioassessments using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2004, 23(1): 126-139.
124. Johnson R K. RIVPACS and alternative statistical modelling techniques: accuracy and soundness of principles. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe DW, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 323-332.
125. Walley W J, Fontama V N. New approaches to river quality classification based upon Artificial Intelligence. In: Wright J F, Sutcliffe DW, Furse M T, eds. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Ambleside, Cumbria: Freshwater Biological Association, 2000, 263-280.
126. Growns I, Reinfelds I, Williams S, Coade G. Longitudinal effects of a water supply reservoir (Tallowa Dam) on downstream water quality, substrate and riffle macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Shoalhaven River, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research, 2009, 60(6): 594-606.
127. Marchant R, Hehir G. The use of AUSRIVAS predictive models to assess the response of lotic macroinvertebrates to dams in southeast Australia. Freshwater Biology, 2002, 47(5): 1033-1050.
128. Nichols S J, Norris R, Maher W, Thoms M. Ecological effects of serial impoundment on the Cotter River, Australia. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572(1): 255-273.
129. Sloane P I W, Norris R H. Relationship of AUSRIVAS-based macroinvertebrate predictive model outputs to a metal pollution gradient. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2003, 22(3): 457-471.
130. White H L, Nichols S J, Robinson WA, Norris R H. More for less: a study of environmental flows during drought in two Australian rivers. Freshwater Biology, 2012, 57(4): 858-873.
131. Harrison E T, Nichols S, Gruber B, Dyer F, Tschierschke A, Norris R. AUSRIVAS: Australia's in-Stream Biological Health 2003-2010. 2011 State of the Environment Reporting. Canberra: Institute for Applied Ecology, 2011.
132. Norris R H, Liston P, Davies N, Coysh J, Dyer F, Linke S, Prosser I, Young B. Snapshot of the Murray-Darling Basin River Condition. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission, 2001 ISBN 1876830220.
133. Norris R H, Prosser I, Young B, Liston P, Bauer N, Davies N, Dyer F, Linke S, Thoms M. The Assessment of River Condition (ARC). An Audit of the Ecological Condition of Australian Rivers. Canberra: National Land and Water Resources Audit, 2001.
134. ACT Government. Environmental Flow Guidelines 2006. Canberra: ACT Government, 2006. Available online at http://www. legislation. act. gov. au/di/2006-13/default. asp (accessed July 25, 2003).
135. EPA. Biological Objectives for Rivers and Streams-Ecosystem Protection. Publication 793. 2 Melbourne, Australia: Environment Protection Authority, Victoria, 2004.
136. Frazier P, Ryder D, McIntyre E, Stewart M. Understanding riverine habitat inundation patterns: remote sensing tools and techniques. Wetlands, 2012, 32(2): 225-237.
137. Peru N, Doledec S. From compositional to functional biodiversity metrics in bioassessment: a case study using stream macroinvertebrate communities. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(5): 1025-1036.
138. Hawkins C P, Vinson M R. Weak correspondence between landscape classifications and stream invertebrate assemblages: implications for bioassessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2000, 19(3): 501-517.
139. Menezes S, Baird D J, Soares A M V M. Beyond taxonomy: a review of macroinvertebrate trait-based community descriptors as tools for freshwater biomonitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 47(4): 711-719.
140. Resh V H, Hildrew A G, Statzner B, Townsend C R. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness - a synthesis of long-term ecological research on the upper Rhone River in the Context of Concurrently Developed Ecological Theory. Freshwater Biology, 1994, 31(3): 539-554.
141. Marchant R, Hirst A, Norris R, Metzeling L. Classification of macroinvertebrate communities across drainage basins in Victoria, Australia: consequences of sampling on a broad spatial scale for predictive modelling. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 253-268.
142. Linke S, Norris R H, Faith D P, Stockwell D. ANNA: a new prediction method for bioassessment programs. Freshwater Biology, 2005, 50(1): 147-158.
143. Aroviita J, Mykra H, Hamalainen H. River bioassessment and the preservation of threatened species: Towards acceptable biological quality criteria. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(4): 789-795.
144. Chessman B C. Climatic changes and 13-year trends in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages in New South Wales, Australia. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15(11): 2791-2802.
145. van Sickle J. An index of compositional dissimilarity between observed and expected assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2008, 27(2): 227-235.
146. van Sickle J, Stoddard J L, Paulsen S G, Olsen A R. Using relative risk to compare the effects of aquatic stressors at a regional scale. Environmental Management, 2006, 38(6): 1020-1030.
147. Webb J A, King E L. A Bayesian hierarchical trend analysis finds strong evidence for large-scale temporal declines in stream ecological condition around Melbourne, Australia. Ecography, 2009, 32(2): 215-225.
148. Olden J D, Poff N L, Bledsoe B P. Incorporating ecological knowledge into ecoinformatics: an example of modeling hierarchically structured aquatic communities with neural networks. Ecological Informatics, 2006, 1(1): 33-42.
149. Merritt R W, Cummins K W, Berg M B, Novak J A, Higgins M J, Wessell K J, Lessard J L. Development and application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approach in the bioassessment of remnant river oxbows in southwest Florida. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2002, 21(2): 290-310.
150. Poff N L, Olden J D, Vieira N K M, Finn D S, Simmons M P, Kondratieff B C. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2006, 25(4): 730-755.
151. Pont D, Hugueny B, Beier U, Goffaux D, Melcher A, Noble R, Rogers C, Roset N, Schmutz S. Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: a European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 43(1): 70-80.
152. Environment Canada. Canadian Aquatic Biomonitoring Network (CABIN), 2012. Available online at http://ec. gc. ca/rcba-cabin/ (accessed July 5, 2013).
153. Feio M J, Doledec S. Integration of invertebrate traits into predictive models for indirect assessment of stream functional integrity: a case study in Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 15(1): 236-247.
154. Parsons M, Thoms M C, Norris R H. Development of a standardised approach to river habitat assessment in Australia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2004, 98(1-3): 109-130.
155. National Water Commission. National Coordination of the Framework for the Assessment of River and Wetland Health (FARWH) Trials. Canberra: National Water Commission, 2012. Available online at http://archive. nwc. gov. au/rnws/ecosystems/national-coord-of-farwh-trials (accessed July 25, 2013).
156. Alluvium Consulting. Framework for the Assessment of River and Wetland Health: Findings from the Trials and Options for Uptake, Waterlines Report. Canberra: National Water Commission, 2011. Available online at http://www. nwc. gov. au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0019/18631/FARWI-Waterlines-FINALV3_2209. pdf (accessed July 25, 2013).
157. Norris R H, Dyer F, Hairsine P, Kennard M, Linke S, Merrin L, Read A, Robinson W, Ryan C, Wilkinson S, Williams D. Assessment of River and Wetland Health: A Framework for Comparative Assessment of the Ecological Condition of Australian Rivers and Wetlands. Canberra: Australian Water Resources 2005, 2007. Available online at http://water. gov. all/publications/RWH_FARWH_Framework_070507. pdf (accessed November 7, 2012).
158. Bunn S E, Abal E G, Smith M J, Choy S C, Fellows C S, Harch B D, Kennard M J, Sheldon F. Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation. Freshwater Biology, 2010, 55(Suppl. 1): 223-240.
159. Schofield N. Australian wide assessment of river health. Water, 2010, 37(1): 153-157.
160. Lee L, Ancev T. Two decades of Murray-Darling water management: a river of funding, a trickle of achievement. Agenda (Durban, South Africa), 2009, 16(1): 5-23.
161. Bowmer K H. Water resource protection in Australia: links between land use and river health with a focus on stubble farming systems. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2011, 403(1-2): 176-185.
162. Bond N R, Lake P S. Ecological restoration and large-scale ecological disturbance: The effects of drought on the response by fish to a habitat restoration experiment. Restoration Ecology, 2005, 13(1): 39-48.
163. Lake P S. On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration, 2001, 2(2): 110-115.
164. Palmer M A, Bernhardt E S, Allan J D, Lake P S, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C N, Follstad Shah J F, Galat D L, Loss S G, Goodwin P, Hart D D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf G M, Lave R, Meyer J L, O'Donnell T K, Pagano L, Sudduth E. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 42(2): 208-217.
165. Johansson ME, Nilsson C. Responses of riparian plants to flooding in free-flowing and regulated boreal rivers: an experimental study. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(6): 971-986.
166. King A J, Ward K A, O'Connor P, Green D, Tonkin Z, Mahoney J. Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Freshwater Biology, 2010, 55(1): 17-31.
167. Poff N L, Allan J D, Palmer M A, Hart D D, Richter B D, Arthington A H, Rogers K H, Meyer J L, Stanford J A. River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2003, 1(6): 298-306.
168. Norris R, Nichols S. Environmental flows: achieving ecological outcomes in variable environments. In: Grafton Q, Hussey K, eds. Water Resources Planning and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 331-349.
169. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Biological River Water Quality Webpage. London: DEFRA, 2012. Available online at http://www. defra. gov. UK/statistics/environment/inlandwater/iwfg 08-biorivqual/(accessed April 11, 2012).
170. Haase P, Pauls S U, Schindehutte K, Sundermann A. First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010, 29(4): 1279-1291.
171. Hebert P D N, Ratnasingham S, deWaard J R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society, 2003, 270(Suppl 1): S96-S99.
172. Baird D J, Hajibabaei M. Biomonitoring 2. 0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing. Molecular Ecology, 2012, 21(8): 2039-2044.