Effects of pretreatments on crystalline properties and morphology of cellulose nanocrystals

Cellulose

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 2427-2437

  Yang, Dong ^a   Peng, Xin Wen ^a   Zhong, Lin Xin ^a,b   Cao, Xue Fei ^a   Chen, Wei ^a   Sun, Run Cang ^a,b  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanocrystals; Pretreatments; Sulfuric acid hydrolysis; TEMPO assisted oxidation

Indexed keywords

2 ,2 ,6 ,6-TETRAMETHYLPIPERIDINE-1-OXYL; CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNCS); IONIC LIQUID DISSOLUTIONS; N-METHYLMORPHOLINE-N-OXIDE; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; PRE-TREATMENTS; SULFURIC ACID HYDROLYSIS;

BALL MILLING; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; DISSOLUTION; HYDROLYSIS; IONIC LIQUIDS; OXIDATION; POLYMORPHISM; SPHERES; SULFURIC ACID;

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; DISSOLVING; GRINDING; HYDROLYSIS; OXIDATION; SPHERES; SULFURIC ACID;

EID: 84884415748     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-9997-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ago M, Endo T, Hirotsu T (2004) Crystalline transformation of native cellulose from cellulose I to cellulose II polymorph by a ball-milling method with a specific amount of water. Cellulose 11: 163-167. doi: 10. 1023/B: CELL. 0000025423. 32330. fa.
2. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (2000) Birefringent glassy phase of a cellulose microcrystal suspension. Langmuir 16(6): 2413-2415. doi: 10. 1021/la9911180.
3. Aulin C, Ahola S, Josefsson P, Nishino T, Hirose Y, Österberg M, Wågberg L (2009) Nanoscale cellulose films with different crystallinities and mesostructures-Their surface properties and interaction with water. Langmuir 25(13): 7675-7685. doi: 10. 1021/la900323n.
4. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Sanchez J-Y, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2004) Preparation of cellulose whiskers reinforced nanocomposites from an organic medium suspension. Macromolecules 37(4): 1386-1393. doi: 10. 1021/ma030532a.
5. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2): 1048-1054. doi: 10. 1021/bm049300p.
6. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13(2): 171-180. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-006-9061-4.
7. Driemeier C, Calligaris GA (2011) Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. J Appl Crystallogr 44(1): 184-192. doi: 10. 1107/S0021889810043955.
8. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C (2007) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9(1): 57-65. doi: 10. 1021/bm700769p.
9. Esteghlalian AR, Bilodeau M, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN (2001) do enzymatic hydrolyzability and Simons' stain reflect the changes in the accessibility of lignocellulosic substrates to cellulase enzymes? Biotechnol Prog 17(6): 1049-1054. doi: 10. 1021/bp0101177.
10. Fan LT, Lee YH, Beardmore DR (1981) The influence of major structural features of cellulose on rate of enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 23(2): 419-424. doi: 10. 1002/bit. 260230215.
11. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20: 583-588. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-012-9833-y.
12. Gao Q, Shen X, Lu X (2011) Regenerated bacterial cellulose fibers prepared by the NMMO H2O process. Carbohydr Polym 83(3): 1253-1256. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2010. 09. 029.
13. Goetz L, Mathew A, Oksman K, Gatenholm P, Ragauskas AJ (2009) A novel nanocomposite film prepared from crosslinked cellulosic whiskers. Carbohydr Polym 75(1): 85-89. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2008. 06. 017.
14. Habibi Y, Chanzy H, Vignon M (2006) TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 13(6): 679-687. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-006-9075-y.
15. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6): 3479-3500. doi: 10. 1021/cr900339w.
16. Hirota M, Tamura N, Saito T, Isogai A (2010) Water dispersion of cellulose II nanocrystals prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of mercerized cellulose at pH 4. 8. Cellulose 17(2): 279-288. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-009-9381-2.
17. Isogai T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A (2008) Degrees of polymerization (DP) and DP distribution of dilute acid-hydrolyzed products of alkali-treated native and regenerated celluloses. Cellulose 15(6): 815-823. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-008-9231-7.
18. Isogai T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A (2009) Degrees of polymerization (DP) and DP distribution of cellouronic acids prepared from alkali-treated celluloses and ball-milled native celluloses by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 16(1): 117-127. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-008-9245-1.
19. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24): 5438-5466. doi: 10. 1002/anie. 201001273.
20. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules 2: 410-416. doi: 10. 1021/bm005612q.
21. Liu Y, Hu H (2008) X-ray diffraction study of bamboo fibers treated with NaOH. Fiber Polym 9(6): 735-739. doi: 10. 1007/s12221-008-0115-0.
22. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31): 9074-9082. doi: 10. 1021/ja0257319.
23. Revol JF, Dietrich A, Goring DAI (1987) Effect of mercerization on the crystallite size and crystallinity index in cellulose from different sources. Can J Chem 65(8): 1724-1725. doi: 10. 1139/v87-288.
24. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromolecules 5(5): 1983-1989. doi: 10. 1021/bm0497769.
25. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10): 786-794. doi: 10. 1177/004051755902901003.
26. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2008) Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 10(2): 425-432. doi: 10. 1021/bm801193d.
27. Terech P, Chazeau L, Cavaille JY (1999) A small-angle scattering study of cellulose whiskers in aqueous suspensions. Macromolecules 32(6): 1872-1875. doi: 10. 1021/ma9810621.
28. van den Berg O, Schroeter M, Capadona JR, Weder C (2007) Nanocomposites based on cellulose whiskers and (semi) conducting conjugated polymers. J Mater Chem 17(26): 2746-2753.
29. Wada M, Heux L, Sugiyama J (2004) Polymorphism of cellulose I family: reinvestigation of cellulose IV. Biomacromolecules 5: 1385-1391. doi: 10. 1021/bm0345357.
30. Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2007a) Preparation and liquid crystalline properties of spherical cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 24(1): 5-8. doi: 10. 1021/la702923w.
31. Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2007b) Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 48(12): 3486-3493. doi: 10. 1016/j. polymer. 2007. 03. 062.
32. Zhang H, Wu J, Zhang J, He J (2005) 1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride room temperature ionic liquid: a new and powerful nonderivatizing solvent for cellulose. Macromolecules 38(20): 8272-8277. doi: 10. 1021/ma0505676.
33. Zhang J, Elder TJ, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ (2007) Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 69(3): 607-611. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2007. 01. 019.