Anchors aweigh: Protein localization and transport mediated by transmembrane domains

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 511-517

  Cosson, Pierre ^a   Perrin, Jackie ^a   Bonifacino, Juan S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Switzerland)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Endomembrane system; Lipid domains; Protein sorting; Protein traffic; Transmembrane domains; Transmembrane receptors

Indexed keywords

LIPID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

CELL MEMBRANE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENDOSOME; GOLGI COMPLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN; UBIQUITINATION;

ENDOMEMBRANE SYSTEM; LIPID DOMAINS; PROTEIN SORTING; PROTEIN TRAFFIC; TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAINS; TRANSMEMBRANE RECEPTORS;

CELL MEMBRANE; GOLGI APPARATUS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84884411179     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Wallin E., von Heijne G. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 1998, 7:1029-1038.
2. Traub L.M. Tickets to ride: selecting cargo for clathrin-regulated internalization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:583-596.
3. Pasquier C., et al. A novel method for predicting transmembrane segments in proteins based on a statistical analysis of the SwissProt database: the PRED-TMR algorithm. Protein Eng. 1999, 12:381-385.
4. Engelman D.M., et al. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1986, 15:321-353.
5. Sharpe H.J., et al. A comprehensive comparison of transmembrane domains reveals organelle-specific properties. Cell 2010, 142:158-169.
6. Lippincott-Schwartz J., et al. Degradation from the endoplasmic reticulum: disposing of newly synthesized proteins. Cell 1988, 54:209-220.
7. Bonifacino J.S., et al. A peptide sequence confers retention and rapid degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 1990, 247:79-82.
8. McCracken A.A., Brodsky J.L. Assembly of ER-associated protein degradation in vitro: dependence on cytosol, calnexin, and ATP. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132:291-298.
9. Bonifacino J.S., et al. Role of potentially charged transmembrane residues in targeting proteins for retention and degradation within the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 1991, 10:2783-2793.
10. Lankford S.P., et al. Transmembrane domain length affects charge-mediated retention and degradation of proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:4814-4820.
11. Cauvi D.M., et al. Transport of the IgE receptor alpha-chain is controlled by a multicomponent intracellular retention signal. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:10448-10460.
12. Williams G.T., et al. The sequence of the mu transmembrane segment determines the tissue specificity of the transport of immunoglobulin M to the cell surface. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171:947-952.
13. Bonifacino J.S., et al. Colocalized transmembrane determinants for ER degradation and subunit assembly explain the intracellular fate of TCR chains. Cell 1990, 63:503-513.
14. Szczesna-Skorupa E., Kemper B. Endoplasmic reticulum retention determinants in the transmembrane and linker domains of cytochrome P450 2C1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:19409-19415.
15. Fiedler K., Rothman J.E. Sorting determinants in the transmembrane domain of p24 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:24739-24742.
16. Ciczora Y., et al. Contribution of the charged residues of hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E2 transmembrane domain to the functions of the E1E2 heterodimer. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86:2793-2798.
17. Hsieh S.C., et al. The length of and nonhydrophobic residues in the transmembrane domain of dengue virus envelope protein are critical for its retention and assembly in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Virol. 2010, 84:4782-4797.
18. Yang M., et al. The transmembrane domain of a carboxyl-terminal anchored protein determines localization to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:1970-1975.
19. Sun Q., et al. The transmembrane domain of the molecular chaperone Cosmc directs its localization to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:11529-11542.
20. Machamer C.E., Rose J.K. A specific transmembrane domain of a coronavirus E1 glycoprotein is required for its retention in the Golgi region. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105:1205-1214.
21. Gerrard S.R., Nichol S.T. Characterization of the Golgi retention motif of Rift Valley fever virus G(N) glycoprotein. J. Virol. 2002, 76:12200-12210.
22. Schaecher S.R., et al. The transmembrane domain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ORF7b protein is necessary and sufficient for its retention in the Golgi complex. J. Virol. 2008, 82:9477-9491.
23. Munro S. Sequences within and adjacent to the transmembrane segment of alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase specify Golgi retention. EMBO J. 1991, 10:3577-3588.
24. Teasdale R.D., et al. The signal for Golgi retention of bovine beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase is in the transmembrane domain. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267:13113.
25. Hu L., et al. The Golgi localization of GOLPH2 (GP73/GOLM1) is determined by the transmembrane and cytoplamic sequences. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e28207.
26. Watson R.T., Pessin J.E. Transmembrane domain length determines intracellular membrane compartment localization of syntaxins 3, 4, and 5. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2001, 281:C215-C223.
27. Munro S. An investigation of the role of transmembrane domains in Golgi protein retention. EMBO J. 1995, 14:4695-4704.
28. Masibay A.S., et al. Mutational analysis of the Golgi retention signal of bovine beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:9908-9916.
29. Sousa V.L., et al. Importance of Cys, Gln, and Tyr from the transmembrane domain of human alpha 3/4 fucosyltransferase III for its localization and sorting in the Golgi of baby hamster kidney cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:7624-7629.
30. Zaliauskiene L., et al. Down-regulation of cell surface receptors is modulated by polar residues within the transmembrane domain. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:2643-2655.
31. Mercanti V., et al. Transmembrane domains control exclusion of membrane proteins from clathrin-coated pits. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:3329-3335.
32. Chia P.Z., et al. Rab9-dependent retrograde transport and endosomal sorting of the endopeptidase furin. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:2401-2413.
33. Huang J., et al. The transmembrane domain of acid trehalase mediates ubiquitin-independent multivesicular body pathway sorting. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:2511-2524.
34. Rayner J.C., Pelham H.R. Transmembrane domain-dependent sorting of proteins to the ER and plasma membrane in yeast. EMBO J. 1997, 16:1832-1841.
35. Reggiori F., et al. Polar transmembrane domains target proteins to the interior of the yeast vacuole. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:3737-3749.
36. Lin S., et al. Mutations in the middle of the transmembrane domain reverse the polarity of transport of the influenza virus hemagglutinin in MDCK epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142:51-57.
37. Ronchi P., et al. Transmembrane domain-dependent partitioning of membrane proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:105-118.
38. Letourneur F., Cosson P. Targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum in yeast cells by determinants present in transmembrane domains. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:33273-33278.
39. Nishikawa S., Nakano A. Identification of a gene required for membrane protein retention in the early secretory pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90:8179-8183.
40. Sato K., et al. Rer1p, a retrieval receptor for endoplasmic reticulum membrane proteins, is dynamically localized to the Golgi apparatus by coatomer. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152:935-944.
41. Massaad M.J., Herscovics A. Interaction of the endoplasmic reticulum alpha 1,2-mannosidase Mns1p with Rer1p using the split-ubiquitin system. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114:4629-4635.
42. Sato K., et al. Rer1p, a retrieval receptor for ER membrane proteins, recognizes transmembrane domains in multiple modes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14:3605-3616.
43. Sato M., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum quality control of unassembled iron transporter depends on Rer1p-mediated retrieval from the golgi. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:1417-1424.
44. Herzig Y., et al. A systematic approach to pair secretory cargo receptors with their cargo suggests a mechanism for cargo selection by Erv14. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001329.
45. Sato B.K., et al. Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:212-222.
46. Reggiori F., Pelham H.R. A transmembrane ubiquitin ligase required to sort membrane proteins into multivesicular bodies. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:117-123.
47. Hettema E.H., et al. Bsd2 binds the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 and mediates the ubiquitination of transmembrane proteins. EMBO J. 2004, 23:1279-1288.
48. Henne W.M., et al. The ESCRT pathway. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:77-91.
49. Sandelius A.S., et al. Isolation of highly purified fractions of plasma membrane and tonoplast from the same homogenate of soybean hypocotyls by free-flow electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81:177-185.
50. Kaiser H.J., et al. Lateral sorting in model membranes by cholesterol-mediated hydrophobic matching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:16628-16633.
51. Hanson M.A., et al. A specific cholesterol binding site is established by the 2.8 A structure of the human beta2-adrenergic receptor. Structure 2008, 16:897-905.
52. Lange Y. Disposition of intracellular cholesterol in human fibroblasts. J. Lipid Res. 1991, 32:329-339.
53. van Meer G., et al. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:112-124.
54. Inder K.L., et al. Ripples in the pond - using a systems approach to decipher the cellular functions of membrane microdomains. Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9:330-338.
55. Spira F., et al. Patchwork organization of the yeast plasma membrane into numerous coexisting domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:640-648.
56. Zhang Y., Williams D.B. Assembly of MHC class I molecules within the endoplasmic reticulum. Immunol. Res. 2006, 35:151-162.
57. Wolfe M.S. Structure, mechanism and inhibition of gamma-secretase and presenilin-like proteases. Biol. Chem. 2010, 391:839-847.
58. Magadan J.G., Bonifacino J.S. Transmembrane domain determinants of CD4 downregulation by HIV-1 Vpu. J. Virol. 2012, 86:757-772.
59. Lacapere J.J., et al. Determining membrane protein structures: still a challenge!. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32:259-270.
60. Barrera N.P., Robinson C.V. Advances in the mass spectrometry of membrane proteins: from individual proteins to intact complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011, 80:247-271.
61. Contreras F.X., et al. Molecular recognition of a single sphingolipid species by a protein's transmembrane domain. Nature 2012, 481:525-529.
62. Betaneli V., et al. The role of lipids in VDAC oligomerization. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:523-531.
63. Swift A.M., Machamer C.E. A Golgi retention signal in a membrane-spanning domain of coronavirus E1 protein. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 115:19-30.