Spectroscopic studies of the effect of aerobic conditions on the chemical characteristics of humic acid in landfill leachate and its implication for the environment

Chemosphere

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1058-1063

  Xiaoli, Chai ^a   Yongxia, Hao ^a   Guixiang, Liu ^a   Xin, Zhao ^a   Youcai, Zhao ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aerobic condition; Humic acid; Landfill; Leachate

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HEAVY METALS; LAND FILL; MAGIC ANGLE SPINNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ORGANIC ACIDS; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; STABILIZATION;

AEROBIC CONDITION; CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC; CROSS POLARIZATION MAGIC-ANGLE SPINNINGS; ELEMENTAL COMPOSITIONS; HUMIC ACID; LEACHATES; ORGANIC MATTER DEGRADATIONS; OXYGEN CONTAINING GROUPS;

LEACHATE TREATMENT;

HEAVY METAL; HUMIC ACID; MERCURY; ORGANIC MATTER; SULFUR; CARBON;

BIODEGRADATION; HEAVY METAL; HUMIC ACID; HUMIFICATION; LANDFILL; LEACHATE; MOBILIZATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ORGANIC MATTER; OXIC CONDITIONS; SPECTROSCOPY; STABILIZATION;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DEGRADATION; HYDROLYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LANDFILL LEACHATE; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PH; AEROBIC METABOLISM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER POLLUTANT;

AEROBIOSIS; CARBON ISOTOPES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84884383789     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.052     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amir S., Hafidi M., Merlina G., Revel J.-C. Structural characterization of fulvic acids during composting of sewage sludge. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1693-1700.
2. Aziz S.Q., Aziz H.A., Yusoff M.S., Bashir M.J.K., Umar M. Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary landfills: a comparative study. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91:2608-2614.
3. Bilgili M.S., Demir A., Akkaya E., Ozkaya B. COD fractions of leachate from aerobic and anaerobic pilot scale landfill reactors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158(1):157-163.
4. Borglin S.E., Hazen T.C., Oldenburg C.M., Zawislanski P.T. Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54(7):815-822.
5. Chai X.L., Shimaoka T., Cao X.Y., Guo Q., Zhao Y.C. Spectroscopic studies of the progress of humification processes in humic substances extracted from refuse in a landfill. Chemosphere 2007, 69:1446-1453.
6. Chai X.L., Ji R., Wu J., Tong H.H., Zhao Y.C. Abiotic association of PAEs with humic substances and its influence on the fate of PAEs in landfill leachate. Chemosphere 2010, 78:1362-1367.
7. Chai X.L., Liu G.X., Zhao X., Hao Y.X., Zhao Y.C. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix combined with regional integration analysis to characterize the composition and transformation of humic and fulvic acids from landfill at different stabilization stages. Waste Manage. 2012, 32:438-447.
8. Chai X.L., Liu G.X., Zhao X., Hao Y.X., Zhao Y.C. Complexion between mercury and humic substances from different landfill stabilization processes and its implication for the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209(210):59-66.
9. Chong T.L., Matsufuji Y., Hassan M.N. Implementation of the semi-aerobic landfill system (Fukuoka method) in developing countries: a Malaysia cost analysis. Waste Manage. 2005, 25:702-711.
10. Dong W.M., Bian Y.R., Liang L.Y., Gu B.H. Binding constants of mercury and dissolved organic matter determined by a modified ion exchange technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45(8):3576-3583.
11. Driscoll N.J.O., Evans R.D. Analysis of methyl mercury binding to freshwater humic and fulvic acids by gel permeation chromatography/hydride generation ICP-MS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34(18):4039-4043.
12. Gonzalez-Vila F.J., Martin F., del Rio J.C., Fruünd R. Structure characteristics and geochemical significance of humic acids isolated from three Spanish lignite deposits. Sci. Total Environ. 1992, 117(118):335-343.
13. 13C NMR in structural studies of humic acids and humin from Holocene sediments. Org. Geochem. 1980, 2:87-92.
14. Huang Q.F., Yang Y.F., Pang X.R., Wang Q. Evolution on qualities of leachate and landfill gas in the semi-aerobic landfill. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20:499-504.
15. Kalbitz K., Geyer S., Geyer W. A comparative characterization of dissolved organic matter by means of original aqueous samples and isolated humic substances. Chemosphere 2000, 40:1305-1312.
16. Kang K.H., Shin H.S., Parka H. Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Res. 2002, 36:4023-4032.
17. 2+) in soil humic acids and soil organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40(3):844-849.
18. Tan, Kim H., 2003. Humic Matter in Soil and the Environment: Principles and Controversies. New York.
19. Pang X.G., Huang Q.F., Wang Q.H., Wang Q. A study on transport rule of nitrogen in semi-aerobic landfill based on 15N isotope technique. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136S:S751-S759.
20. Pang X.G., Huang Q.F., Wang Q.H., Wang Q. In situ research of migration and transformation of nitrogen in the semi-aerobic landfill. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136S:S633-S646.
21. Preston C.M., Schnitzer M. Effect of chemical modifications and extractants on the carbon NMR spectra of humic materials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1984, 48:305-311.
22. Reemtsma T., These A. Comparative investigation of low-molecular-weight fulvic acids of different origin by SEC-Q-TOF-MS: new insights into structure and formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:3507-3512.
23. Rivas F.J., Beltran F., Carvalho F., Acedo B., Gimeno O. Stabilized leachates: sequential coagulation flocculation chemical oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater. B 2004, 116:95-102.
24. 13C NMR spectroscopy. Oceanol. Acta 1997, 21:543-550.
25. Steelink C. Implications of elemental characteristics of humic substances. Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water 1985, 457-476. Wiley, New York. G.R. Aiken, D.M. McKnight, R.L. Warshaw (Eds.).
26. Weng L.P., Fest E., Fillius J., Temminghoff E.J.M., van Riemsdijk W.H. Transport of humic and fulvic acids in relation to metal mobility in a copper-contaminated acid sandy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:1699-1704.
27. Wershaw R.L., Pinckney D.J., Llaguno E.C., Vicente-Beckett V. NMR characterization of humic acid fractions from different Philippine soils and sediments. Anal. Chim. Acta 1990, 232:31-42.
28. Zouboulis A.I., Chai X.L., Katsoyiannis I.A. The application of bioflocculant for the removal of humic acids from stabilized landfill leachates. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 70:35-41.