Influence of geography and climate on patterns of cell size and body size in the lizard Anolis carolinensis

Integrative Zoology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 184-196

  Goodman, Rachel M ^a   Echternacht, Arthur C ^a   Hall, Jim C ^a   Deng, Lihan D ^a,b   Welch, Jessica N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bergmann's rule; Ecogeographic pattern; Latitude; Longitude; Reptile; Temperature

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CELL SIZE; CLIMATE; CYTOLOGY; ERYTHROCYTE; GEOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; LIZARD; MORPHOMETRICS; MUSCLE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CELL SIZE; CLIMATE; ERYTHROCYTES; GEOGRAPHY; LIZARDS; MUSCLE CELLS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84884366084     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17494877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12041     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams DC, Church JO (2008). Amphibians do not follow Bergmann's rule. Evolution 622, 413-20.
2. Arendt JD (2000). Allocation of cells to proliferation vs differentiation and its consequences for growth and development. Journal of Experimental Zoology 288, 219-34.
3. Arendt JD (2007). Ecological correlates of body size in relation to cell size and cell number: patterns in flies, fish, fruits and foliage. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 82, 241-56.
4. Arendt JD, Hoang L (2005). Effect of food level and rearing temperature on burst speed and muscle composition of western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii). Functional Ecology 19, 982-7.
5. Ashton KG (2002a). Patterns of within-species body size variation of birds: strong evidence for Bergmann's rule. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11, 505-23.
6. Ashton KG (2002b). Do amphibians follow Bergmann's rule? Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 708-16.
7. Ashton KG, Feldman CR (2003). Bergmann's rule in nonavian reptiles: turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution 57, 1151-63.
8. Ashton KG, Tracy MC, de Queiroz A (2000). Is Bergmann's rule valid for mammals? The American Naturalist 156, 390-415.
9. Atkinson D (1994). Temperature and organism size: a biological law for ectotherms? Advances in Ecological Research 25, 1-58.
10. Auffenberg W (1956). Additional records of Pleistocene lizards from Florida. Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 19, 157-67.
11. Belk MC, Houston DD (2002). Bergmann's rule in ectotherms: a test using freshwater fishes. The American Naturalist 16, 803-8.
12. Bergmann C (1847). Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 3, 595-708.
13. Bishop DC, Echternacht AC (2004). Emergence behavior and movements of winter-aggregated green anoles (Anolis carolinensis) and the thermal characteristics of their crevices in Tennessee. Herpetologica 60, 168-77.
14. Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N (1999). Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann's rule. Diversity and Distributions 5, 165-74.
15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
16. Campbell-Staton S, Goodman R, Backström N, Edwards S, Losos J, Kolbe J (2012). Out of Florida: mtDNA reveals Pleistocene migration and post-glacial range expansion of the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Evolutionary Ecology 2, 2274-84.
17. Conant R, Collins JT (1998). A Field Guide to Reptiles & Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America (Peterson Field Guide Series), 3rd ed?n?, exp. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
18. Cuadrado A, Navarrete MH, Canovas JL (1989). Cell size of proliferating plant cells increases with temperature: implications in the control of cell division. Experimental Cell Research 185, 277-82.
19. Dixon JR (2000). Amphibians and Reptiles of Texas, 2nd edn. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
20. Garman S (1887). On West Indian Iguanidae and on West Indian Scincidae in the collection of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Cambridge, Mass., USA. Bulletin of the Essex Institute 19, 25-50.
21. Gillis GB, Bonvini L, Irschick DJ (2009). Losing stability: tail loss and jumping in the arboreal lizard Anolis carolinensis. Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 604-9.
22. Goodman RM (2008). Latent effects of egg incubation temperature on growth in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. Journal of Experimental Zoology 309A, 1-9.
23. Goodman RM (2010). Evidence of divergent growth rates among populations of the lizard Anolis carolinensis based on experimental manipulations of egg size. Population Ecology 52, 113-22.
24. Goodman RM, Heah TP (2010). Temperature-induced plasticity in an ectotherm: the 'temperature size rule' examined at cellular and organismal levels. Integrative Zoology 5, 208-17.
25. Gordon RE (1956). The biology and biodemography of Anolis carolinensis carolinensis Voigt (PhD dissertation). Tulane University, New Orleans.
26. Gregory TR (2000). Nucleotypic effects without nuclei: genome size and erythrocyte size in mammals. Genome 43, 895-901.
27. Holman JA (1995). Pleistocene Amphibians and Reptiles in North America. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. James FC (1970). Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51, 365-90.
29. King FW (1966). Competition between two south Florida lizards of the genus Anolis (PhD dissertation). University of Miami, Coral Gables.
30. Kolbe JJ, Losos JB (2005). Hind-limb length plasticity in Anolis carolinensis. Journal of Herpetology 39, 674-8.
31. Kozlowski J, Konarzewski M, Gawelczyk AT (2003). Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. PNAS 100, 14080-5.
32. Kozlowski J, Czarnoleski M, François-Krassowska A, Maciak S, Pis T (2010). Cell size is positively correlated between different tissues in passerine birds and amphibians, but not necessarily in mammals. Biology Letters 6, 792-6.
33. Lee JC (1985). Anolis sagrei in Florida: phenetics of a colonizing species. I. Meristic characters. Copeia 1985, 182-94.
34. Mayr E (1956). Geographical character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution 10, 105-8.
35. Michael ED (1972). Growth rates in Anolis carolinensis. Copeia 1972, 575-7.
36. Michaud EJ, Echternacht AC (1995). Geographic variation in the life history of the lizard Anolis carolinensis and support for the pelvic constraint model. Journal of Herpetology 29, 86-97.
37. Minesky JJ (1999). Development and application of a genetic algorithm-informational modelling approach to exploratory statistical modelling of lizard-habitat relationships (PhD dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
38. Oliver JA (1950). Anolis sagrei in Florida. Copeia 1950, 55-6.
39. Packard GC, Packard MJ (1988). The physiological ecology of reptilian eggs and embryos. In Gans C, Huey RB, eds. Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 16. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 525-605.
40. Power M, McKinley RS (1997). Latitudinal variation in lake sturgeon size as related to the thermal opportunity for growth. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126, 549-58.
41. Schoener TW (1970). Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Correlations with the sizes of particular sympatric species- displacement and convergence. The American Naturalist 104, 155-73.
42. Shine R (2004). Adaptive consequences of phenotypic plasticity. In: Deeming DC, ed. Reptilian Incubation: Environment, Evolution and Behavior. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, pp. 187-210.
43. Sinervo B (1990). Evolution of thermal physiology and growth rate between populations of the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis). Oecologia 83, 228-37.
44. Starostova Z, Kratochvil L, Frynta D (2005). Dwarf and giant geckos from the cellular perspective: the bigger the animal, the bigger its erythrocytes? Functional Ecology 19, 744-9.
45. Stillwell RC, Morse GE, Fox CW (2007). Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle. The American Naturalist 170, 358-69.
46. Stillwell RC (2010). Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive? Oikos 119, 1387-90.
47. Szarski H (1983). Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 105, 201-9.
48. Szarski H (1985). Cell size in various vertebrate tissues. Fortschritte Der Zoologie 30, 313-6.
49. Tollis M, Ausubel G, Ghimire D, Boissinot S (2012). Multi-locus phylogeographic and population genetic analysis of Anolis carolinensis: historical demography of a genomic model species. PLOS ONE 7, e38474.
50. Turnbough NW (2006). Geographic distribution: Anolis sagrei. Herpetological Review 37, 361.
51. Van der Have TM, de Jong G (1996). ?Adult size in ectotherms: temperature effects on growth and differentiation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 183, 329-40.
52. Van Voorhies WA (1996). Bergmann size clines: a simple explanation for their occurrence in ectotherms. Evolution 50, 1259-64.
53. Watt C, Mitchell S, Salewski V (2010). Bergmann's rule; a concept cluster? Oikos 119, 89-100.
54. Webb SD (1990). Historical biogeography. In Myers RL, Ewel JJ, eds. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, pp. 70-100.
55. West GB, Woodruff WH, Brown JH (2002). Allometric scaling of metabolic rate from molecules and mitochondria to cells and mammals. PNAS 99, 2473-8.
56. Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2006). Geographic variation in body size: the effects of ambient temperature and precipitation. Oecologia 148, 213-8.