Privatization: A drain on public schools

Educational Leadership

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 48-53

  Harvey, James ^a  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884359904     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Bull. E. (1991). Bone dance. New York: Ace Books.
2. Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2009a), Fact vs. fiction: An analysis of Dr. Hoxby's misrepresentation of CREDO'S research. Palo Alto, CA: Author.
3. Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2009b). Multiple choice: Charter school performance in 16 states. Palo Alto, CA: Author.
4. Center on Education Policy. (2011, June). Strained schools see bleak future: Districts see budget cuts, teacher layoffs, and a slowing of education reform efforts. Washington, DC: Author.
5. de Tocqueville, A. (1835/1960). Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Onginal work published 1835)
6. Friedman. M. & Friedman R. (1979). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York: Avon Books.
7. Full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011. H.R. 1, 112th Cong. (2011).
8. Governor Chris Christie announces innovative transformation schools initiative. (2011. June 9). Retrieved from the Office of the Governor, State of New Jersey at www.state.nj.us/governor/news/news/552011/approved/20110609b.html
9. Lake, R. (Ed.). (2010). Hopes, fears and reality: A balanced look at American charier schools in 2009. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington-Bothell.
10. Liptak, A. (2011, April 4). Supreme Court allows tax credit for religious tuition. New York Times.
11. Locke, J. (1690/1980). Two treatises of government. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1690)
12. Mann, H. (1848). Twelfth annual report of Horace Mann as Secretary of Massachusetts State Board of Education.
13. McNichol, E., Oliff, P., & Johnson, N. (2011, June 11). States continue to feci recession's impact. Retrieved from Center on Budget and Policy Priorities at www xbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=711
14. National Coalition for Public Education, (n.d.). Summary of all Department of Education DC voucher evaluations. Retrieved from National School Board Association at www.nsba.org/Advocacy/Key-Issues/SchoolVouchers/ VoucherStrategyCenter/VoucherResearch/EDStudy.pdf
15. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 26(1), 1-20.
17. Ott, T. (2011, February 22). Cleveland students hold their own with voucher students on state tests. Cleveland Plain Dealer.
18. Ravitch, D. (2011, April 12). Vouchers make a comeback, but why? [blog post]. Retrieved from Bridging Differ enees at http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/ Bridging-Differences/naep
19. Raymond, M. E. (2003). The performance of California charier schools. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Center for Research on Education Outcomes.
20. Richards E., & Hetzner, A. (2011, March 29). Choice schools not outperforming MPS. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
21. Scholarships for Opportunity and Results Act, H.R. 471, 112th Cong. (2011).
22. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
23. Smith, A. (1776/1910). The wealth of nations. New York: E.P. Dutton.
24. The year of school choice [Editorial]. (2011, July 5) Wall Street Journal.