Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: Extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1380-1394

  The, Bertram ^a   Reininga, Inge H F ^b   El Moumni, Mostafa ^b   Eygendaal, Denise ^c  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Basic Science; Clinical rating systems; Elbow; Population; Reliability; Responsiveness; Systematic Review; Validation of Outcome Instruments; Validity

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGEONS SCORE; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAYO ELBOW PERFORMANCE SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY;

BASIC SCIENCE; CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS; ELBOW; POPULATION; RELIABILITY; RESPONSIVENESS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION OF OUTCOME INSTRUMENTS; VALIDITY;

CONSENSUS; ELBOW JOINT; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84884352450     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: 15326500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Broberg M.A., Morrey B.F. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68:669-674.
2. Dawson J., Doll H., Boller I., Fitzpatrick R., Little C., Rees J., et al. The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:466-473. 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290.
3. Dawson J., Doll H., Boller I., Fitzpatrick R., Little C., Rees J., et al. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery. Qual Life Res 2008, 17:1257-1267. 10.1007/s11136-008-9409-3.
4. De Boer Y.A., van den Ende C.H., Eygendaal D., Jolie I.M., Hazes J.M., Rozing P.M. Clinical reliability and validity of elbow functional assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999, 26:1909-1917.
5. De Boer Y.A., Hazes J.M., Winia P.C., Brand R., Rozing P.M. Comparative responsiveness of four elbow scoring instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2001, 28:2616-2623.
6. Dowrick A.S., Gabbe B.J., Williamson O.D., Cameron P.A. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury 2005, 36:468-476. 10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.014.
7. Ewald F.C., Scheinberg R.D., Poss R., Thomas W.H., Scott R.D., Sledge C.B. Capitellocondylar total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980, 62:1259-1263.
8. Figgie M.P., Inglis A.E., Mow C.S., Figgie H.E. Total elbow arthroplasty for complete ankylosis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989, 71:513-520.
9. King G.J., Richards R.R., Zuckerman J.D., Blasier R., Dillman C., Friedman R.J., et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999, 8:351-354.
10. Longo U.G., Franceschi F., Loppini M., Maffulli N., Denaro V. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull 2008, 87:131-161. 10.1093/bmb/ldn023.
11. Macdermid J. Update: the Patient-rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire is now the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation. J Hand Ther 2005, 18:407-410. 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.002.
12. MacDermid J.C. Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 2001, 14:105-114.
13. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Knol D.L., Stratford P.W., Alonso J., Patrick D.L., et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality ofstudies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMCMed Res Methodol 2010, 10:22. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
14. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., Alonso J., Stratford P.W., Knol D.L., et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. QualLife Res 2010, 19:539-549. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
15. Newcomer K.L., Martinez-Silvestrini J.A., Schaefer M.P., Gay R.E., Arendt K.W. Sensitivity of the Patient-rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther 2005, 18:400-406. 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.001.
16. Overend T.J., Wuori-Fearn J.L., Kramer J.F., MacDermid J.C. Reliability of a patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther 1999, 12:31-37.
17. Revicki D., Hays R.D., Cella D., Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:102-109. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012.
18. Rompe J.D., Overend T.J., MacDermid J.C. Validation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Ther 2007, 20:3-10. 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003.
19. Sathyamoorthy P., Kemp G.J., Rawal A., Rayner V., Frostick S.P. Development and validation of an elbow score. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004, 43:1434-1440. Erratum in: Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:1081. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh367.
20. Terwee C.B., Mokkink L.B., Knol D.L., Ostelo R.W., Bouter L.M., de Vet H.C. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012, 21:651-657. 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
21. Turchin D.C., Beaton D.E., Richards R.R. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:154-162.