Multilevel governance and management of shared stocks with integrated markets: The Europe ananchovy case

Marine Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 407-416

  Mulazzani, Luca ^a   Curtin, Richard ^b   Andrés, Marga ^b   Malorgio, Giulio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

Author keywords

European anchovy; IAD framework; Integrated markets; Multilevel governance; Price; Shared fisheries

Indexed keywords

CLUPEOID; FISHERY ECONOMICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; MARKET CONDITIONS; STOCKING DENSITY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PRICE DYNAMICS; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

ADRIATIC SEA; ATLANTIC OCEAN; BAY OF BISCAY; CROATIA; FRANCE; ITALY; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; SPAIN;

ENGRAULIDAE; ENGRAULIS ENCRASICOLUS;

EID: 84884333917     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Munro G, Van Houtte A, Willmann R. The conservation and management of shared fish stocks: legal and economic aspects. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 465. Rome: FAO; 2004.
2. Caddy JF. Establishing a consultative mechanism or arrangement for managing shared stocks within the jurisdiction of contiguous states. In: Hancock D, editor. Taking stocks: defining and managing shared resources. Australian Society for Fish Biology and Aquatic Resource Management Association of Australasia Joint Workshop Proceedings. Sydney: Australian Society for Fish Biology; 1997.
3. Sen S, Raakjaer Nielsen J. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Mar Policy 1996;20:405-418.
4. Berkes F. Cross-scale institutional linkages for commons management: perspective from the bottom up. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU, editors. The drama of the commons. Washington: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
5. Berkes F. From community-based resource management to complex system: the scale issue and marine commons. Ecol Soc 2006;11:45 [accessed 03.03.12].
6. Nielsen M. Price formation and market integration on the European firsthand market for whitefish. Mar Resour Econ 2005;20:185-202.
7. Huang H, Leung PS. Testing for market linkages between Hawaii and Japan's tuna markets. Fish Res 2011;109:351-359.
8. Setala J, Laitinen J, Virtanen J, Saarni K, Nielsen M, Honkanen A. Spatial integration of freshwater fish markets in the Northern Baltic Sea area. Fish Res 2008;92:196-206.
9. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EU) no. 43/2012 fixing for 2012 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for certain fish stocks and groups offish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements. OJ L 25; 27/1/2012. p. 1.
10. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EU) No. 44/2012 fixing for 2012 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements. OJ L 25; 27/1/ 2012. p. 55.
11. GFCM. Report of the ninth session of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the GFCM. Rome, 24-27 October 2006. [online] URL: [accessed 03.03.12].
12. Nielsen M, Smit J, Guillen J. Market integration offish in Europe. J Agric Econ 2009;60:367-385.
13. FAO fisheries department, fishery information, data and statistics unit. FISHSTAT Plus: universal software for fishery statistics time series. Version 2.3.
14. Asche F, Gordon DV, Hannesson R. Tests for market integration and the Law of One Price: the market for whitefish in France. Mar Resour Econ 2004;19:195-210.
15. Eurostat. Statistical Service of the European Union. [accessed 03.03.12].
16. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
17. Ostrom E. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton Uni-varsity Press; 2005.
18. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 1994.
19. Fidelman P, Evans L, Fabinyi M, Foale S, Cinner J, Rosen F. Governing large-scale marine commons: contextual challenges in the coral triangle. Mar Policy 2012;36:42-53.
20. Ostrom E. A general framework for analysing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009;325:419-422.
21. Copes P. The backward-bending supply curve of the fishing industry. Scott J Polit Econ 1970;17:69-77.
22. Gordon HS. The economics of a common property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 1954;62:124-142.
23. Schaefer MB. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm 1954;1:27-56.
24. Stigler GJ, Sherwin RA. The extent of a market. J Law Econ 1985;28:555-585.
25. Anderson J, Avdic E, Bartelings H, Bengstberg R, Berkenhagen J, Brodie C, Calvo C, Davidjuka I, Goti L, Guillen J, Kuzebski E, Lees J, Longoni E, Malvarosa L, Miguez A, Motova A, Moura C, Prellezo R, Souffez A, Stroie C, Thoegersen T, Virtanen J, Zanzi A. The 2010 annual economic report on the European fishing fleet. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.
26. Mulazzani L. Modellizzazione bioeconomica per la gestione dei piccoli pelagici nel Mar Adriatico. PhD thesis. Bologna: Universita di Bologna; 2011.
27. Valle I. del, Astorkiza I, Astorkiza K. Is the current regulation of the VIII division European anchovy optimal? Environ Resour Econ 2001;19:53-72.
28. Borja A, Uriarte A, Valencia V, Motos L, Uriarte A. Relationships between anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) recruitment and the environment in the Bay of Biscay. Sci Mar 1996;60(Suppl. 2):179-192.
29. Jennings S, Kaiser MJ. The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 1998;34:201-352.
30. Shannon LJ, Field JG, Moloney CL. Simulating anchovy-sardine regime shifts in the southern Benguela ecosystem. Ecol Modell 2004;172:269-281.
31. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) no. 850/1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. OJ L 125; 27/4/1998. p. 1.
32. MRAG, IFM, CEFAS, AZTI Tecnalia, PolEM. An analysis of existing Rights Based Management (RBM) instruments in Member States and on setting up best practices in the EU. Final Report 2009 London: MRAG Ltd.; 2009.
33. ICES. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2011, Book 7, Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian Waters; 2011. .
34. Roel B, Uriarte A, Ibaibarriaga L, Sanchez S, Vermard Y., Prellezo R, del Valle I, Guyader O. Scientific, technical and economic committee for fisheries. Report of Working Group on balance between resources and their exploitation (SGBRE). Long term management of Bay of Biscay Anchovy (SGBRE-08-01). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2009.
35. Curtin R, Martinet V. Viability of transboundary fisheries and international quota sharing: the case of the Bay of Biscay Anchovy, < http://www.gerad.ca/ fichiers/activites/act0657/AnchovyViabilityModel_20110110.pdf >.
36. Astorkiza K, del Valle I, Astorkiza I. Fisheries policy and the cofradi{dotless}́as in the Basque country: the case of albacore and anchovy. Documento de trabajo 9809. Departamento de Economia. Universidad Publica de Navarra; 1998. [accessed 03.03.12].
37. BOE. Real Decreto 429/2004, de 12 de marzo, por el que se establecen medidas de ordenacion de la flota pesquera de cerco. Bol Of Estado 2004;65:11557-11558.
38. BOE. ORDEN APA/676/2004, de 5 de marzo, por la que se regula la pesca con artes de cerco en el Caladero Nacional del Cantabrico y Noroeste. Bol Of Estado 2004;65:11558-11560.
39. Uriarte A, Prouzet P, Villamor B. Bay of Biscay and Ibero Atlantic anchovy populations and their fisheries. Sci Mar 1996;60(Suppl. 2):237-255.
40. ICES. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2009. Book 7. Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian Waters; 2009. [accessed 03.03.12].
41. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EU) no. 685/2010 establishing the fishing opportunities for anchovy in the Bay of Biscay for the 2010/11 fishing season and amending Regulation (EU) no. 53/2010. OJ L 199; 31/7/2010. p. 1.
42. European Commission. COM/2011/426 final. Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing the fishing opportunities for anchovy in the Bay of Biscay for the 2011/-2012 fishing season.
43. Court of Justice. Joined cases C-61/96, C-132/97, C-45/98, C27/99, C81/00and C-22/01. Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union. Judgment of 18 April 2002. ECR 2002. p. I-03439.
44. Court of First Instance. Case T-415/03, Cofradia de Pescadores de "San Pedro"de Bermeo and others v council of the European Union. Judgment of 19 October 2005.
45. Sentencia de Audiencia Nacional-Sala de lo Contencioso, 9 de Mayo 2007. Numero de Recurso 550/2003.
46. Fonda Umani S. Pelagic production and biomass in the Adriatic Sea. Sci Mar 1996;60(Suppl. 2):65-77.
47. Agostini V, Bakun A. "Ocean triads"in the Mediterranean Sea: physical mechanisms potentially structuring reproductive habitat suitability (with example application to European anchovy, Engraulis encrasiclous). Fish Oceanogr 2002;11:129-142.
48. Regner S. Effects of environmental changes on early stages and reproduction of anchovy in Adriatic Sea. Sci Mar 1996;60(Suppl. 2):167-177.
49. Coll M, Santojanni A, Arneri E, Palomera I, Tudela S. An ecosystem model of the northern and central Adriatic Sea: analysis of ecosystem structure and fishing impacts. J Mar Syst 2007;67:119-154.
50. SAC GFCM. Sub-committee on stock assessment. Document prepared by the AdriaMed (MIPAAF-FAO project) working group for small pelagic; 2010. [accessed 03.03.12].
51. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) no. 1967/2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, amending Regulation (EEC) no. 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) no. 1626/94. OJ L 409; 30/12/2006. p. 9.
52. AdriaMed. General outline of marine capture fisheries legislation and regulations in the Adriatic Sea countries. [accessed 03.03.12].
53. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (Ec) no. 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy. OJ L 358; 31/12/2002. p. 59.
54. Mackelworth P, Holcer D, JovanovicJ, Fortuna C. Marine conservation and accession: the future for the Croatian Adriatic. Environ Manage 2011;47: 644-655.
55. European Commission. European Commission screening report Croatia-Chapter 13-Fishery; 2006 [accessed 03.03.12].
56. European Union. Accession Document, European Union common position. In: Proceedings of the Conference on accession to the European Union-Croatia; 2011. < http://euinfo.pravo.hr/userfiles/file/ad00016_en11_PApdf > [accessed 03.03.12].
57. European Commission. COM/2011/425. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Common fishery Policy; 2011. [accessed 03.03.12].
58. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) no. 104/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products. OJ L 17; 21/1/2000. p. 22.
59. Mulazzani L, Camanzi L, Malorgio G. Price formation and geographic market integration: an empirical investigation of Adriatic small pelagic species. Fish Res 2012;119-120:99-107.
60. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) no. 1184/2006 applying certain rules of competition to the production of, and trade in, agricultural products. OJ L 214; 4/8/2006. p. 7.
61. Spagnolo M. Elementi di Economia e Gestione della Pesca. Milan: Franco Angeli; 2006.
62. McCay BJ. Resistance to changes in property rights or, why not ITQs? In: Shotton R, editor. Use of property rights in fisheries management. FAO fisheries technical paper 404/1. Rome: FAO; 2000.
63. García J, Arteche J, Murillas A. Fractional integration analysis and its implications on profitability: the case of the mackerel market in the Basque Country. Fish Res 2010;106:420-429.
64. Loureiro ML, Ribas A, López E, Ojea E. Estimated costs and admissible claims linked to the Prestige oil spill. Ecol Econ 2006;59:48-63.
65. Marigómez I, Soto M, Cancio I, Orbea A, Garmendia L, Cajaraville MP. Cell and tissue biomarkers in mussel, and histopathology in hake and anchovy from Bay of Biscay after the Prestige oil spill (Monitoring Campaign 2003). Mar Pollut Bull 2006;53:287-304.
66. Nielsen M. Modelling fish trade liberalisation: does fish trade liberalisation result in welfare gains or losses? Mar Policy 2009;33:1-7.