Accuracy assessment of the ITRF datum definition

International Association of Geodesy Symposia

Volumn 132, Issue , 2008, Pages 101-110

  Altamimi, Z ^a   Collilieux, X ^a   Boucher, C ^b  

^a INSTITUT GÉOGRAPHIQUE NATIONAL   (France)

^b Conseil Général des Ponts et Chaussées ^*  (France)

Author keywords

ITRF; minimum constraints; reference frames; Reference systems

Indexed keywords

EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS; INTERNATIONAL TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAMES; ITRF; MINIMUM CONSTRAINTS; REFERENCE FRAME; REFERENCE SYSTEMS; TIME SERIES OF STATION POSITIONS; TRANSFORMATION PARAMETERS;

GEODESY; TIME SERIES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84884328038     PISSN: 09399585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74584-6_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Altamimi, Z., P. Sillard and C. Boucher (2002), ITRF2000: A new release of the international terrestrial reference frame for earth science applications, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B10), 2214, doi:10.1029/2001JB000561.
2. Altamimi, Z., P. Sillard and C. Boucher (2003). The impact of a no-net-rotation condition on ITRF2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(2), 1064, doi:10.1029/2002GL016279.
3. Altamimi Z., P. Sillard and C. Boucher (2004). ITRF2000: From Theory to Implementation. In: Sansò F (ed.), V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, International Association of Geodesy Volume 127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 157-163.
4. Argus, D.F. and R.G. Gordon (1991). No-net rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL-1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2038-2042.
5. Blaha G. (1971), Inner adjustment constraints with emphasis on range observations, Department of Geodetic Science, Report 148, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
6. Dermanis, A. (2000), Establishing Global Reference Frames. Nonlinear, Temporal, Geophysical and Stochastic Aspects, In: Sideris, (ed.), Gravity, Geoid and Geodynamics 2000, IAG Symposium Vol. 123, pp. 35-42.
7. Dermanis, A. (2008) The ITRF Beyond the Linear Model Choices and Challenges, this issue.
8. DeMets, C., R.G. Gordon, D.F. Argus and S. Stein (1990). Current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int., 101, 425-478.
9. DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein (1994). Effect of recent revisions of the geomagnetic reversal timescale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21(20), 2191-2194.
10. Kreemer, C., D. A. Lavallee, G. Blewitt and W. E. Holt (2006), On the stability of a geodetic no-net-rotation frame and its implication for the international terrestrial reference frame, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17306, doi:10.1029/2006GL027058.
11. McCarthy D. and G. Petit, 2003. IERS Conventions 2000, http://maia.usno.navy.mil/conv2000.html.
12. Petit, G., Report of the BIPM/IAU Joint Committee on relativity for space-time reference systems and metrology, in Proc. of IAU Colloquium 180, In: Johnston K. J., D.D. McCarthy, B.J. Luzum and G.H. Kaplan, (eds.), U.S. Naval Observatory, 275-282, 2000.
13. Sillard, P. and C. Boucher, (2001) Review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference frame datum definition, J. Geodesy, 75, 63-73.
14. Zhu and Mueller, (1983) Effects of adopting new precession, nutation and equinox corrections on the terrestrial reference frame, Bulletin Godsique Vol 57 n 1. pp 29-41.