Concept lattices and ontologies to query a directory of biological data sources (BioRegistry);Treillis de concepts et ontologies pour l'interrogation d'un annuaire de sources de donné'es biologiques (BioRegistry)

INFORSID 2005: Actes du XXIIIeme Congres Informatique des Organisations et Systemes d'Information et de Decision

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Messai, N ^a   Devignes, M D ^a   Napoli, A ^a   Smail Tabbone, M ^a  

^a LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Concept lattices; Data sources; Metadata; Ontologies

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC QUERY REFINEMENT; BINARY RELATION; BIOINFORMATIC DATA SOURCES; BIOLOGICAL DATA; BIOLOGICAL FIELDS; CONCEPT LATTICES; DATA-SOURCES; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES;

BIOINFORMATICS; METADATA; ONTOLOGY; QUERY LANGUAGES;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84884316133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Carpineto C., Romano G., A Lattice Conceptual Clustering System and Its Application to Browsing Retrieval., Machine Learning, vol. 24, n 2, 1996, p. 95-122.
2. Carpineto C., Romano G., Order-theoretical ranting, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 51, n 7, 2000, p. 587-601.
3. Carmel D., Farchi E., Petruschka Y., Soffer A., Automatic query refinement using lexical affinities with maximal information gain, SIGIR '02: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Tampere, Finland, 2002, ACM Press, p. 283-290.
4. DavidsonS., Crabtree J., BrunkB., Brian P., Schug J., Tannen V., Overton G. C., StoeckertC. J., K2/Kleisli and GUS: experiments in integrated access to genomic data sources, IBM systems journal, vol. 40, 2000, p. 512-531.
5. Dekkers M., Weibel S., Sate of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, D-Lib Magazine, vol. 9, n4,2003.
6. Discala C., Benigni X., Barillot E., Vaysseix G., DBCAT: A catatog of 500 biological databases, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, n 1, 2000, p. 8-9.
7. Gaperin M. Y., The Molecular Biology Database Colleton: 2005 update, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, 2005, National Center for Biotechnology Information and National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health
8. Ganter B., Wile R., Formal Concept Analysis, Springer, mathematical foundations edition, 1999.
9. Ganesan P., Garcia-Malia H., Widom J., Exploiting hierarchical domain structure to compute similarity, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 21, n 1, 2003, p. 64-93.
10. Goble C. A., Stevens R., NG G., Bechhofer S., PatonN. W., Baker P. G., PeimM., Brass A., Transparent Access to Multiple Bioinformatics Information Sources, IBM Systems Journal Special issue on deep computing for the life sciences, vol. 40, n 2, 2001, p. 532552.
11. Godin R., Mineau G., Missaoui R., Méthodes de dassification conceptuelle basées sur les treillis de Gdois et applications, Revue d'intelligence artificielle, vol. 9, n 2, 1995, p. 105-137.
12. Godin R., Missaoui R., Alaoui H., Incremental Concept Formation Algorithms Based on Gatois (Concept) Lattices., Computational Intelligence, vol. 11, 1995, p. 246-267.
13. Kohler J., Philippi S., Lange M., SEMEDA: ontology based semantic integration of biological databases, Bioinformatics, vol. 19, 2003, p. 2420-2427.
14. Kuznetsov S., Obiedkov S., Comparing Performance of Algorithms for Generating Concept Lattices, Journal ofiExperimental V Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14, 2002, p. 189-216, Taylor & Francis
15. Lord P., Bechhofer S., Wilkinson M. D., Schütz G., Gessler D., Hull D., Goble C., Stein L., Applying semantic web services to Bioinformatics: Experiences gamed, lessons lernt, ISWC, 2004.
16. Oinn T., Addis M., Ferris J., Marvin D., Senger M., Greenwood M., Carver T., Glover K., Pocock M. R., Wipat A., Li P., Taverna: A tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows, Bioinformatics, vol. 20, 2004, p. 3045-3054.
17. Pernelle N., Rousset M.-C., Soldano H., Ventos V., ZooM: A nested Gatois lattices-based system for conceptual catering, Journal ofi Experimental and Theoritical Artifial Intelligence (JETAI), vol. 14, n2, 2002, p. 157-187.
18. Priss U., Lattice-based Information Retrieval, Knowledge Organization, vol. 27, n 3, 2000, p. 132-142.
19. Safar B., Kefi H., Reynaud C., OntoRefiner: A user query refinement interface usable for Semantic Web Portals, Proceedings ofi the ECAI 2004, Workshop on Application ofi Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities, August 2004.
20. Summe G., Taouil R., Bastide Y., Lakhal L., Conceptual Clustering with Iceberg Concept Lattices, Proceeding GI-Fachgruppentreffen Maschinelles Lernen (FGML '01), Oktober 2001.
21. Wile R., Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, Orderdsets, vol. 23, 1982, p. 445-470, Rival editor
22. Wile R., Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems, International Classification, vol. 2, 1984, p. 77-86.
23. Wroe C., Stevens R., Goble C., Roberts A., Greenwood M., A suite of DAML+OIL Ontologies to Describe BioinformaticsWeb Services and Data, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems special issue on Bioinformatics, 2003.