Generalized preferential attachment: Towards realistic socio-semantic network models

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 171, Issue , 2005, Pages 29-42

  Roth, Camille ^a  

^a Centre de Recherche en Epistemologie Appliquee Ecole Polytechnique   (France)

Author keywords

Complex systems; Dynamic networks; Morphogenesis models; Preferential attachment; Social networks

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC NETWORK; MODEL DESIGN; NETWORK FORMATION; NETWORK MODELS; PREFERENTIAL ATTACHMENTS; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MORPHOLOGY; TOOLS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84884312030     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74: 47-97, 2002.
2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286: 509-512, 1999.
3. A.-L. Barabási, H. Jeong, R. Ravasz, Z. Neda, T. Vicsek, and T. Schubert. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311: 590-614, 2002.
4. V. Batagelj and M. Bren. Comparing resemblance measures. Journal of Classification, 12(1): 73-90, 1995.
5. M. Boguna and R. Pastor-Satorras. Class of correlated random networks with hidden variables. Physical Review E, 68: 036112, 2003.
6. M. Boguna, R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Diaz-Guilera, and A. Arenas. Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Physical Review E, 70: 056122, 2004.
7. G. Caldarelli, A. Capocci, P. D. L. Rios, and M. A. Munoz. Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. Physical Review Letters, 89(25): 258702, 2002.
8. M. Catanzaro, G. Caldarelli, and L. Pietronero. Assortative model for social networks. Physical Review E, 70: 037101, 2004.
9. P. Cohendet, A. Kirman, and J.-B. Zimmermann. Emergence, formation et dynamique des réseaux - modèles de la morphogenèse. Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 103(2-3):15-42, 2003.
10. V. Colizza, J. R. Banavar, A. Maritan, and A. Rinaldo. Network structures from selection principles. Physical Review Letters, 92(19): 198701, 2004.
11. E. Eisenberg and E. Y. Levanon. Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution. Physical Review Letters, 91(13): 138701, 2003.
12. P. Erdos and A. Rényi. On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae, 6: 290-297, 1959.
13. A. Fabrikant, E. Koutsoupias, and C. H. Papadimitriou. Heuristically optimized trade-offs: A new paradigm for power laws in the internet. In ICALP '02: Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, pages 110-122, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
14. J.-L. Guillaume and M. Latapy. Bipartite structure of all complex networks. Information Processing Letters, 90(5): 215-221, 2004.
15. R. Guimera, B. Uzzi, J. Spiro, and L. A. N. Amaral. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308: 697-702, 2005.
16. H. Jeong, Z. Néda, and A.-L. Barabási. Measuring preferential attachment for evolving networks. Europhysics Letters, 61(4): 567-572, 2003.
17. E. M. Jin, M. Girvan, and M. E. J. Newman. The structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E, 64(4): 046132, 2001.
18. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In CIKM '03: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 556-559, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
19. S. S. Manna and P. Sen. Modulated scale-free network in euclidean space. Physical Review E, 66: 066114, 2002.
20. M. McPherson and L. Smith-Lovin. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-440, 2001.
21. M. E. J. Newman. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review Letters E, 64(025102), 2001.
22. M. E. J. Newman. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2): 404-409, 2001.
23. W. W. Powell, D. R. White, K. W. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4): 1132-1205, 2005.
24. J. J. Ramasco, S. N. Dorogovtsev, and R. Pastor-Satorras. Self-organization of collaboration networks. Physical Review E, 70: 036106, 2004.
25. S. Redner. Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review. Physics Today, 58: 49-54, 2005.
26. C. Roth and P. Bourgine. Binding social and cultural networks: a model. arXiv.org e-print archive, nlin. AO/0309035, 2003.
27. C. Roth and P. Bourgine. Epistemic communities: Description and hierarchic categorization. Mathematical Population Studies, 12(2): 107-130, 2005.
28. B. Skyrms and R. Pemantle. A dynamic model of social network formation. PNAS, 97(16): 9340-9346, 2000.
29. T. A. Snijders. The statistical evaluation of social networks dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31: 361-395, 2001.
30. B. Söderberg. A general formalism for inhomogeneous random graphs. Physical Review E, 68: 026107, 2003.
31. H. Stefancic and V. Zlatic. Preferential attachment with information filtering-node degree probability distribution properties. Physica A, 350(2-4):657-670, 2005.
32. D. J. Watts, P. S. Dodds, and M. E. J. Newman. Identity and search in social networks. Science, 296: 1302-1305, 2002.