The teaching circle for large engineering courses: Clearing the activation barrier

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Finelli, Cynthia J ^a   Millunchick, Joanna Mirecki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884311158     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Dancy, M. & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78, 1056-1063.
2. Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Prince, M. J. (2011). Engineering instructional development: Programs, best practices, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.
3. Finelli, C. J., & Daly, S. R. (2011, Oct). Teaching practices of engineering faculty: Self-reported behavior and actual practice. Proceedings of the 2011 International Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.
4. Finelli, C. J., Pinder-Grover, T., & Wright, M. C. (2011). Consultations on teaching. Using student feedback for instructional improvement. In C. E. Cook & M. L. Kaplan (Eds.), Advancing the culture of teaching at a research university: How a teaching center can make a difference. pp. 65-79. Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing.
5. Finelli, C. J., Richardson, K. M., & Daly, S. R. (2013). Factors that influence faculty motivation to adopt effective teaching practices in engineering. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
6. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
7. Hora, M. T. (2012). Organizational factors and instructional decision-making: A cognitive perspective. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 207-235.
8. Hora, M., Ferrare, J., & Anderson, C. (2009). Structured observation protocol for instruction in institutions of higher education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
9. Light, G., Calkins, S., Luna, M., & Drane, D. (2009). Assessing the impact of a year-long faculty development program on faculty approaches to teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2). 168-181.
10. Murray, H. G. (1985). Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness. In J.G. Donald & A.M. Sullivan (Eds.), Using Research to Improve Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-246.
12. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices (Cooperative learning and Problem-based learning). Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 87-102.
13. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(44), 409-424.
14. Wlodkowski, R. J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.