A Concept-based Approach for Indexing Documents in IR

INFORSID 2005: Actes du XXIIIeme Congres Informatique des Organisations et Systemes d'Information et de Decision

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Baziz, Mustapha ^a   Boughanem, Mohand ^a   Traboulsi, Salam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

Author keywords

Conceptual indexing; Information Retrieval; Ontologies; Semantic Representation of documents; Similarity measures; WordNet

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT-BASED APPROACH; CONCEPTUAL INDEXING; DOCUMENT CONTENTS; DOCUMENT SEMANTICS; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS; SEMANTIC-BASED RETRIEVAL; SIMILARITY MEASURE; WORDNET;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84884310190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Krovetz, R., and W B Croft Lexical ambiguity and information retrieval ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 10(2), pp. 115-141, 1992.
2. Khan, L., and Luo, F.: Ontology Construction for Information Selection In Proc. of 14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 122-127, Washington DC, November 2002.
3. Mihalcea, R. and Moldovan, D.: Semantic indexing using WordNet senses. In Proceedings of ACL Workshop on IR & NLP, Hong Kong, October 2000.
4. Joon Ho Lee, Myong Ho Kim, and Yoon Joon Lee. "Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in IS-A hierarchies". Journal of Documentation, 49(2):188-207, 1993.
5. Haav, H. M., Lubi, T.-L.: A Survey of Concept-based Information Retrieval Tools on the Web. In Proc. of 5th East-European Conference ADBIS 2001, Vol 2., Vilnius "Technika", pp 29-41.
6. Baziz, M., Boughanem, M., Aussenac-Gilles, N. The Use of Ontology for Semantic Representation of Documents. In The 2nd Semantic Web and Information Retrieval Workshop (SWIR), SIGIR 2004, Sheffield UK, 29 July 2004. Yin Ding, Keith van Rijsbergen, Iad Ounis, Joemon Jose (Eds.), a, p. 38-45.
7. Guarino, N., Masolo, C., and Vetere, G. "OntoSeek: content-based access to the web". IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14:70-80, 1999.
8. Voorhees, E. M. Using WordNet to Disambiguate Word Sense for Text Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 171-180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.
9. Stokoe, C., Oakes, M. P., Tait, J. "Word sense Disambiguation in Information Retrieval Revisited". Proceed. of the 26th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 159-166, Toronto, Canada, 2003.
10. Gonzalo, J., Verdejo, F., Chugur, I., Cigarrán, J., Indexing with WordNet synsets can improve text retrieval, in Proc. The COLING/ACL '98 Workshop on Usage of WordNet for Natural Language Processing, 1998.
11. Sanderson, M., "Retrieving with good senses". In Information Retrieval, Vol. 2(1), pp. 49-69, 2000.
12. Woods, W., 97: Conceptual Indexing: A Better Way to Organize Knowledge. Technical report SMLI TR-97-61, Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Mountain view, CA.
13. Cucchiarelli, Navigli, R., Neri, F., Velardi, P., Extending and Enriching WordNet with OntoLearn, Proc. of The Second Global Wordnet Conference 2004 (GWC 2004), Brno, Czech Republic, January 20-23rd, 2004.
14. Budanitsky A., Lexical Semantic Relatedness and its Application in Natural Language Pro-cessing, technical report CSRG-390, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, August1999.
15. S.Patwardhan,S.Banerjee,andT.Pedersen.2003.Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics CICLING, Mexico City, 2003.
16. Jason Rennie, WordNet::QueryData: a Perl module for accessing the WordNet database, http://people.csail.mit.edu/~jrennie/WordNet, 2003.
17. Claudia Leacock and Martin Chodorow. 1998. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In Fellbaum 1998, pp.265-283.
18. Philip Resnik, "Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy" Proceedings of the 14th Intern. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1995.
19. Jay J.Jiang and David W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic simi-larity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics,Taiwan.
20. Dekang Lin. An information theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the 15 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, WI. 1998.
21. Lesk M.E., Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from a nice cream cone. In Proceedings of the SIGDOC Conference. Toronto, 1986.
22. Buitelaar, P., Steffen D., Volk, M., Widdows, D., Sacaleanu, B., Vintar, S., Peters, S., Uszkoreit, H., Evaluation Resources for Concept-based Cross-Lingual IR in the Medical Domain In Proc. of LREC2004, Lissabon, Portugal, May 2004.
23. Boughanem M., Dkaki, T. Mothe J and C. Soulé-Dupuy "Mercure at TREC-7". In Proceeding of Trec-7, (1998).
24. Croft, W. B., Turtle, H. R. & Lewis, D. D. (1991). The Use of Phrases and Structured Queries in Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, A. Bookstein, Y. Chiaramella, G. Salton, & V. V. Raghavan (Eds.), Chicago, Illinois: pp. 32-45.
25. Huang, X. and Robertson, S.E. "Comparisons of Probabilistic Compound Unit Weighting Methods", Proc. of the ICDM'01 Workshop on Text Mining, San Jose, USA, Nov. 2001.
26. Salton G The SMART Retrieval System. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall 1971.
27. Quillian, M. Ross (1968), "Semantic Memory", in Marvin Minsky (ed.) Semantic Information Processing (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 227-270.
28. Véronis, J. (2000). Ingénierie des langues, chapitre Annotation automatique de corpus: panorama et état de la technique, pages 111-129. Hermes, Paris.