Approach for the establishment of a global vertical reference level

International Association of Geodesy Symposia

Volumn 132, Issue , 2008, Pages 119-125

  Sanchez L ^a  

^a DGFI   (Germany)

Author keywords

geodetic boundary value problem; global vertical reference level; W0 determination; world height datum

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY SURFACES; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; GLOBAL GRAVITY MODELS; GRAVITY DISTURBANCE; NUMERICAL COMPUTATIONS; REFERENCE LEVELS; SATELLITE ALTIMETRY; WORLD HEIGHT DATUM;

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; SITE SELECTION;

GEODESY;

EID: 84884305810     PISSN: 09399585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74584-6_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Andersen, O.B., A.L. Vest, P. Knudsen (2004). KMS04 mean sea surface model and inter-annual sea level variability. Poster presented at EGU Gen. Ass. 2005, Vienna, Austria, 24-29, April.
2. AVISO (1996). AVISO user handbook. Merged Topex/Poseidon products (GDR-MS). CLS/CNES, AVINT-02-101-CN. 3rd Ed., July.
3. Bursa, M., J. Kouba, M. Kumar, A. Müller, K. Radej, S. True, V. Vatrt, M. Vojtiskova (1999). Geoidal geopotential and world height system. Studia geoph. et geod. 43: 327-337.
4. Bursa, M., S. Kenyon, J. Kouba, K. Radej, V. Vatrt, M. Vojtiskova, J. Simek (2002). World height system specified by geopotential at tide gauge stations. IAG Symposia, 124: 291-296, Springer.
5. Förste, C., F. Flechtner, R. Schmidt, U. Meyer, R. Stubenvoll, F. Barthelmes, R. König, K.H. Neumayer, M. Rothacher, Ch. Reigber, R. Biancale, S. Bruinsma, J.-M. Lemoine, J.C. Raimondo (2005) A new high resolution global gravity field model derived from combination of GRACE and CHAMP mission and altimetry/gravimetry surface gravity data. Poster presented at EGU General Assembly 2005, Vienna, Austria, 24-29, April.
6. GRGS/GFZ (2006). Global gravity model EIGEN-GL04S. Available at http://bgi.cnes.fr:8110/geoid-variations/ SH models /EIGEN GL04S.
7. Heck, B., R. Rummel (1990). Strategies for solving the vertical datum problem using terrestrial and satellite geodetic data. IAG Symposia 104: 116-128, Springer.
8. Hernandez, F., Ph. Schaeffer (2001a). The CLS01 mean sea surface: a validation with the GFSC00.1 surface. www.cls.fr/html/oceano/projects/mss/cls 01 en.html.
9. Hernandez, F., Ph. Schaeffer (2001b). MSS CLS01 http://www.cls.fr/html/oceano/projects/mss/cls 01 en.html.
10. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., H. Moritz (2005). Physical Geodesy. Springer Verlag, Wien.
11. Koblinsky et al. (1999). NASA ocean altimeter pathfinder project, report 1: data processing handbook, NASA/TM-1998-208605, April.
12. Koch, K.R. (1971). Die geodätische Randwertaufgabe bei bekannter Erdoberfläche. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen. 96: 218-224.
13. Knudsen, P., A.L. Vest, O. Anderssen (2004). Evaluating mean dynamic topography models within the GOCINA project. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Envisat & ERS Symposium, 6-10 September, 2004. Salzburg, Austria. (ESA SP-572, April 2005). Published and distributed by: ESA Publications Division.
14. Lehmann, R. (2000). Altimetry-gravimetry problems with free vertical datum. Journal of Geodesy 74: 327-334. Springer.
15. Lemoine, F., S. Kenyon, J. Factor, R. Trimmer, N. Pavlis, D. Chinn, C. Cox, S. Kloslo, S. Luthcke, M. Torrence, Y. Wang, R. Williamson, E. Pavlis, R. Rapp, T. Olson (1998). The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt.
16. Mather, R.S. (1978). The role of the geoid in four-dimensional geodesy. Marine Geodesy, 1: 217-252.
17. McCarthy, D.D., G. Petit (Eds.) (2004). IERS technical note No. 32: IERS Conventions (2003). Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie. Frankfurt am Main.
18. Moritz, H. (1980). Geodetic Reference System 1980. Bulletin Geodesique. 54(3): 295-405.
19. 0 on the satellite altimetry basis. Earth, Moon and Planets, 65: 79-88.
20. Rapp, R. (1994). Separation between reference surfaces of selected vertical datums. Bull. Géod. 69: 23-31.
21. Rapp. R. (1995). Equatorial radius estimates from Topex altimeter data. Publication dedicated to Erwin Groten on the ocassion of his 60th anniversary. Publication of the Institite of Geodesy and Navigation (IfEN), University FAF Munich. pp. 90-97.
22. Rummel, R., P. Teunissen. (1988). Height datum definiton, height datum connection and the role of the geodetic boundary value problem. Bull. Géod. 62: 477-498.
23. Sacerdorte, F., F. Sanso (2001). W0: A story of the height datum problem. In: Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Vermessungswesen der Universität Hannover. Nr. 241: 49-56.
24. Sacerdorte, F., F. Sanso (2004). Geodetic boundary-value problems and the height datum problem. IAG Symposia 127: 174-178. Springer.
25. Sánchez, L (2007). Definition and realization of the SIRGAS vertical reference system within a globally unified height system. IAG Symposia, 130: 638-645, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
26. Sanso, F. S. Usai (1995). Height datum and local geodetic datums in the theory of geodetic boundary problem. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten (AVN). 102 Jg. Heft 8-9: 343-355.
27. Sanso, F., G. Venuti (2002). The height/geodetic datum problem. Geophys. J. Int. 149: 768-775.
28. Tapley, B., M. Kim, S. Poole, M. Cheng, D. Chambers, J. Ries (2001). The TEG-4 Gravity field model. AGU Fall 2001. Abstract G51A-0236.
29. Tapley, B., J., Ries, S. Bettadpur, D. Chambers, M. Cheng, F. Condi, B. Gunter, Z. Kang, P. Nagel, R. Pastor, T. Pekker, S. Poole, F. Wang. (2005). GGM02: An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. Journal of Geodesy, 79: 467-478.
30. Tscherning C., R. Forsberg, P. Knudsen (1992). Description of the GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. In: Holota, P., M. Vermeer (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1st continental workshop on the geoid in Europe. Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography. Prague: 327-334.