Governmentalities of gov 2.0

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1397-1418

  Henman, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

e government; social policy; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884233692     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.706314     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allan, R. 2009. Power of Information Taskforce Report, London: Cabinet Office.
2. ATO (Australian Tax Office). 2008. New and Emerging Social Media: Research Review into Use Within the ATO Operating Environment, Canberra: ATO.
3. Beer, D. and Burrows, R. 2007. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online, 12 (5) [Online] Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html) (13 July 2012) (doi:10.5153/sro.1560)
4. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R. and Hovy, E. 2010. Government 2.0: making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15: 1 - 9.
5. Clarke, J. 2004. Changing Welfare, Changing States, London: Sage.
6. Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E. and Westmarland, L. 2007. Creating Citizen-Consumers, London: Sage.
7. Davies, A. and Lithwick, D. 2010. Government 2.0 and Access to Information: Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in Canada, Ottawa: Library of Parliament Canada.
8. Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality 2nd edn, Sage, London
9. Di Maio, A. (2009a) Government 2.0: Lost in EU Declaration, [Online] Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/11/19/government-2-0-lost-in-eu-declaration/ (6 September 2010).
10. Di Maio, A. (2009b, November 11) Fighting the Asymmetry of Government 2.0, [Online] Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/11/11/fighting-the-asymmetry-of-government-2-0/ (6 September 2010).
11. Di Maio, A. (2010, May 3) Australia Beats the US Again on Government 2.0, [Online] Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2010/05/03/australia-beats-the-us-again-on-government-2-0/ (6 September 2010).
12. Eggers, W. D. 2005. Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
13. EU (2009) 'Ministerial declaration on eGovernment', statement approved at the Teaming up for the eUnion: 5th Ministerial eGovernment Conference, Malmö, Sweden, 18 November.
14. EU (2012) An Overview of the eGovernment and eInclusion Situation in Europe, [Online] Available at: www.epractice.eu/factsheets (16 February 2012).
15. Foucault, M. 1982. " The subject and power: Afterword ". In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Edited by: Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. 208 - 226. Sussex: Harvester Press.
16. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Gordon, C. 1980. " Afterword ". In Michele Foucault: Power/Knowledge, Edited by: Gordon, C. 229 - 259. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
19. Gordon, C. 1991. " Governmental rationality: An introduction ". In The Foucault Effect, Edited by: Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. 1 - 51. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20. Gruen, N. 2009. Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0 Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce, Canberra: Department of Finance and Deregulation.
21. Han, S. 2011. Web 2.0, London: Routledge.
22. Henman, P. 2010. Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
23. Hu, G., Pan, W. and Wang, J. 2010. The distinctive lexicon and consensual conception of e-government: An exploratory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76 (3): 577 - 597. (doi:10.1177/0020852310372447)
24. Lovink, G. 2007. Zero Comments: Blogging and Critical Internet Culture, London: Routledge.
25. Mayo, E. and Steinberg, T. 2007. The Power of Information, London: Office of Public Sector Information.
26. McClure, D. L. (2010) Government 2.0: Federal Agency Use of Web 2.0 Technologies, statement to Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 22 July.
27. Miller, P. and Rose, N. 1990. Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1): 1 - 31. (doi:10.1080/03085149000000001)
28. Mishra, G. (2009) The Promise and Myth of Barack Obama's Government 2.0, [Online] Available at http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/the-promise-and-myth-of-barack-obamas-government-20/ (7 September 2010).
29. Morison, J. 2010. Gov 2.0: towards a user generated state?. The Modern Law Review, 73 (4): 551 - 577. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00808.x)
30. New Zealand (2010a) Web 2.0 Social Networking Tools, [Online] Available at: http://plone.e.govt.nz/resources/research/progress/agency-intitiatives/chapter6.html (7 September 2010).
31. New Zealand (2010b) Guide to Online Participation, [Online] Available at: http://www.e.govt.nz/policy/participation/guide-to-online-participation (23 November 2010).
32. OECD. 2007. Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis, and Social Networking, Paris: OECD.
33. O'Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0, [Online] Available at: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (7 September 2010).
34. Orszag, P. R. (2009) Open Government Directive, Memorandum, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 8 December.
35. Osimo, D. 2008. Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How?, Paris: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, EC.
36. Pheonix Strategic Perspectives Inc. 2008a. New Technologies and Government of Canada Communications, Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
37. Pheonix Strategic Perspectives Inc. 2008b. New Technologies and Government of Canada Communications, Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
38. Scholl, H. J. (2003) 'E-government: A special case of ICT-enabled business process change', paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), [Online] Available at: http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceed-ings/hicss/&toc=comp/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/05/1874toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2003.10015 (7 September 2010).
39. Song, F. W. 2010. Theorizing Web 2.0: A cultural perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 13 (2): 249 - 275. (doi:10.1080/13691180902914610)
40. Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations, London: Little Brown.
41. UK. 2009. Digital Britain: Final Report, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
42. UN. 2010. E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging E-Government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis, New York: UN.
43. US Federal Web Managers Council (2008) Putting Citizens First: Transforming Online Government, [Online] Available at: http://www.usa.gov/webcontent/documents/Federal_Web_Managers_WhitePaper.pdf (26 November 2010).