Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States

Value in Health

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 953-964

  Gilbert, Sharon A ^a   Grobman, William A ^b   Landon, Mark B ^c   Varner, Michael W ^d   Wapner, Ronald J ^e   Sorokin, Yoram ^f   Sibai, Baha M ^g   Thorp, John M ^h   Ramin, Susan M ⁱ   Mercer, Brian M ^j  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^j METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

accreta cost effectiveness elective repeat trial of labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILD DEATH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; PLACENTA ACCRETA; PLACENTA PREVIA; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; UTERUS RUPTURE;

ACCRETA; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTIVE REPEAT; TRIAL OF LABOR;

ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84884231806     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. M. MacDorman, E. Declerq, and F. Menacker Recent trends and patterns in cesarean birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States Clin Perinatol 38 2011 179 192
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. In: National Vital Statistics Reports (Vol. 60, No. 1). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2011.
3. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Evidence/Report Technology Assessment No. 191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2007-10057-I. AHRQ publication no. 10-E003). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010.
4. A. Chung, A. Macario, and Y.Y. El-Sayed Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 932 941
5. S.A. Gilbert, W.A. Grobman, and M.B. Landon Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort Am J Perinatol 30 2013 11 20
6. C.G. Fawsitt, J. Bourke, and R.A. Greene At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery PLoS ONE 8 2013 e58577
7. W.A. Grobman, A.M. Peaceman, and M.L. Socol Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery after one prior low transverse cesarean Obstet Gynecol 95 2000 745 751
8. E. Pare, J.N. Quinones, and G.A. Macones Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes BJOG 113 2006 75 85
9. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:6
10. R.A. Hirth, M.E. Chernew, and E. Miller Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: in search of a standard Med Decis Making 20 2000 332 342
11. M.B. Landon, J.C. Hauth, and K.J. Leveno Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med 351 2004 2581 2589
12. C.Y. Spong, M.B. Landon, and S. Gilbert Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 110 2007 801 807
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG committee opinion no. 394: cesarean delivery on maternal request Obstet Gynecol 110 2007 1501 1514
14. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor Obstet Gynecol 114 2009 386 397
15. W.A. Grobman, S. Gilbert, and M.B. Landon Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean Obstet Gynecol 109 2007 262 269
16. Martinez G, Daniels K, Chandra A. Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. In: National Health Statistics Reports (No. 51). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2012.
17. Arias E. United States life tables, 2007. In: National Vital Statistics Reports (Vol. 59, No. 9). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2011.
18. J.Z. Press, M.C. Klein, and J. Kaczorowski Does cesarean section reduce postpartum urinary incontinence? A systematic review Birth 34 2007 228 237
19. E.L. Simpson, R.A. Lawrenson, and A.L. Nightingale Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database BJOG 108 2001 56 60
20. G. Casella Refining binomial confidence intervals Can J Stat 14 1986 113 129
21. J.-M. Guise, M. McDonagh, and J. Hashima Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC). Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 71 (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0018. AHRQ Publication No. 03-E018) 2003 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
22. N. Baldawi, J.F. Felix, and J.J. Kurinczuk Cerebral palsy following term newborn encephalopathy: a population-based study Dev Med Child Neurol 47 2005 293 298
23. HCUPnet. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Available from: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. [Accessed July 7, 2011].
24. American Medical Association. CPT code/relative value search. Available from: https://catalog.ama-assn.org/Catalog/cpt/cpt-search.jsp. [Accessed September 28, 2010].
25. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Usual weekly earnings of wage and salary workers. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/ cps/cpswktabs.htm. [Accessed July 7, 2011].
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment-United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:57-9.
27. R.T. Katz Life expectancy for children with cerebral palsy and mental retardation: implications for life care planning Neurorehabilitation 18 2003 261 270
28. Cerebral Palsy Source. Cerebral palsy quick facts. Available from: http://www.cerebralpalsysource.com/About-CP/life-cp/index.html. [Accessed October 25, 2009].
29. L. Wilson, J.S. Brown, and G.P. Shin Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence Obstet Gynecol 98 2001 398 406
30. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index Report. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/. [Accessed July 7, 2011].
31. A.C. Haddox, S.M. Teutsch, and P.S. Corso Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation 2003 Oxford University Press New York
32. R.A. Harris, A.E. Washington, and R.F. Nease Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold Lancet 363 2004 276 282
33. A. Manca, M.J. Sculpher, and K. Ward A cost-utility analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence BJOG 110 2003 255 262
34. A.E. Carroll, and S.M. Downs Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies Pediatrics 117 Suppl. 2006 S287 S295
35. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:233
36. M.T. O'Shea, M.A. Klebanoff, and C. Signore Delivery after a previous cesarean: long-term outcomes in the child Semin Perinatol 34 2010 281 292
37. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights, March 8-10, 2010 Obstet Gynecol 115 2010 1279 1295
38. R.M. Lewis, J.N. McKoy, and J.C. Andrews Future Research Needs to Reduce Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Women. Future Research Needs Paper No. 22 (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2207-1065-I. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC131-EF) 2012 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD