Goodness-of-fit test for proportional subdistribution hazards model

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 3804-3811

  Zhou, Bingqing ^a,b   Fine, Jason ^c,d   Laird, Glen ^e  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

^d University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^e BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

Author keywords

Competing risk; Goodness of fit; Hazard of subdistribution; Martingale residual; Proportional hazard; Score test

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO; TAMOXIFEN;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CENSORSHIP; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; DATA PROCESSING; ELDERLY CARE; GOODNESS OF FIT TEST; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; TIME; TIME VARYING COEFFICIENT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPETING RISK; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; HAZARD OF SUBDISTRIBUTION; MARTINGALE RESIDUAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARD; SCORE TEST;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; TAMOXIFEN;

EID: 84884210542     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5815     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999; 94:496-509.
2. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, SeriesB 1972; 34:187-200.
3. Lagakos SW, Schoenfeld DA. Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models. Biometrics 1984; 40:1037-1048.
4. Lagakos SW. The loss in efficiency from misspecifying covariates in proportional hazards regression models. Biometrika 1988; 75:156-160.
5. Lin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989; 84:1074-1078.
6. Lin DY, Wei LJ. Goodness-of-fit tests for the general Cox regression model. Statistica Sinica 1991; 1:1-17.
7. Scheike TH, Zhang MJ. Flexible competing risks regression modelling and goodness-of-fit. Lifetime Data Analysis 2008; 14:464-483.
8. Dauxois JY, Kirmani SNUA. On testing the proportionality of two cumulative incidence functions in a competing risks setup. Journal Of Nonparametric Statistics 2004; 16:479-491.
9. Schoenfeld D.Chi-square goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1980; 67:145-153.
10. Moreau T, O'Quigley J, Mesbah M. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for the proportional hazards model. Applied Statistics 1985; 34:212-218.
11. Moreau T, O'Quigley J, Lellouch J. On D. Schoenfeld's approach for testing the proportional hazards assumption. Biometrika 1986; 73:513-515.
12. Barlow WE, Prentice RL. Residuals for relative risk regression. Biometrika 1988; 75:65-74.
13. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 1993; 80:557-572.
14. Grønnesby JK, Borgan Ø. A method for checking regression models in survival analysis based on the risk score. Lifetime Data Analysis 1996; 2:315-328.
15. Marzec L, Marzec P. On fitting Cox's regression model with time-dependent coefficients. Biometrika 1997; 84:901-908.
16. Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994; 81:515-526.