Does shape co-variation between the skull and the mandible have functional consequences? A 3D approach for a 3D problem

Journal of Anatomy

Volumn 223, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 329-336

  Cornette, Raphaël ^a   Baylac, Michel ^a   Souter, Thibaud ^a   Herrel, Anthony ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Biting; Geometric morphometrics; Muscle; Shrews; Surface shape

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BITE; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; GEOMETRY; JAW ADDUCTOR MUSCLE; JAW MOVEMENT; JAW MUSCLE; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH;

CROCIDURA; MAMMALIA; SORICIDAE;

BITING; GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS; MUSCLE; SHREWS; SURFACE SHAPE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHREWS; SKULL;

EID: 84884207131     PISSN: 00218782     EISSN: 14697580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12086     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arnold SJ (1983) Morphology, performance and fitness. Am Zool 23, 347-361.
2. Badyaev AV, Foresman KR (2004) Evolution of morphological integration. I. Functional units channel stress-induced variation in shrew mandibles. Am Nat 163, 868-879.
3. Badyaev AV, Foresman KR, Young RL (2005) Evolution of morphological integration: developmental accommodation of stress-induced variation. Am Nat 166, 382-395.
4. Baylac M (2012) Rmorph: a R geometric and multivariate morphometrics library. Available from the author: baylac@mnhn.fr.
5. Bernardini F, Mittleman J, Rushmeier H, et al. (1999) The ball-pivoting algorithm for surface reconstruction. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 5, 349-359.
6. Bookstein FL, Green WDK (2002) Users Manual, EWSH3.19. http://brainmap.stat.washington.edu/edgewarp/.
7. Breuker CJ, Debat V, Klingenberg CP (2006) Functional evo-devo. Trends Ecol Evol 21, 488-492.
8. Churchfield S (1990) The Natural History of Shrews, pp. 178. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing.
9. Cornette R, Herrel A, Cosson JF, et al. (2012) Rapid morpho-functional changes among insular populations of the greater white-toothed shrew. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 107, 322-331.
10. Dötsch C (1985) Masticatory function in shrews (Soricidae). Acta Zool Fennica 173, 231-235.
11. Dötsch C (1994) Function of the feeding apparatus in red-toothed and white-toothed shrews (Soricidae) using electromyography and cineradiography. In: Advances in the Biology of Shrews (eds Merritt JF, Kirkland GLJr, Rose RK), pp. 233-239. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
12. Freeman PW (1998) Form, function, and evolution in skulls and teeth of bats. In: Bat Biology and Conservation (ed. Kunz TH), pp. 140-156. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
13. Gasc JP (1963) La musculature céphalique chez Suncus Ehr., Crocidura Wag., Sylvisorex Thom., Myosorex Gr. (Insectivores). Mammalia 27, 582-601.
14. Gunz P, Mitteroecker P (2013) Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix 24, 103-109.
15. Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL (2005) Semi-landmarks in three dimensions. In: Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. (ed. Slice D), pp. 383. New York: Kluwer Academic.
16. Hautier L, Lebrun R, Cox PG (2012) Patterns of covariation in the masticatory apparatus of Hystricognathous rodents: implications for evolution and diversification. J Morphol 273, 1319-1337.
17. Herrel A, Aerts P, De Vree F (1998) Static biting in lizards: functional morphology of the temporal ligaments. J Zool (Lond) 244, 135-143.
18. Herrel A, De Smet A, Aguirre LF, et al. (2008) Morphological and mechanical determinants of bite force in bats: do muscles matter? J Exp Biol 211, 86-91.
19. Loeb GE, Gans C (1986) Electromyography for Experimentalists, pp. 373. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Mendez J, Keys A (1960) Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9, 184-188.
21. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P (2009) Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Bio 36, 235-247.
22. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
23. Rohlf FJ, Corti M (2000) Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst Biol 49, 740-753.
24. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Biol 39, 40-59.
25. Sarà M (1996) A landmark-based morphometrics approach to the systematics of Crocidurinae: case study on endemic shrews Crocidura sicula and C. canariensis (Soricidae, Mammalia). In: Advances in Morphometrics NATO Science Series A: Life Sciences 284. (eds Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE), pp. 335-344. Hamburg: Springer.
26. Schwenk K (2000) Feeding. Form, Function, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates. (ed. Schwenk K), pp. 537. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Souter T, Cornette R, Pedraza J, et al. (2010) Two applications of 3D semi-landmark morphometrics implying different template designs: the theropod pelvis and the shrew skull. C R Palevol 9, 411-422.
28. Van Valkenburgh B (2007) Déjà vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora. Integr Comp Biol 47, 147-163.
29. Wagner GP, Pavlicev M, Cheverud JM (2007) The road to modularity. Nat Rev Genet 8, 921-930.
30. Wake DB, Roth G (1989) Complex Organismal Functions: integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, pp. 466. Hoboken: John Wiley.
31. Wiley DF, Amenta N, Alcantara DA, et al. (2005) Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005 (VIS'05), 23-28 October 2005, pp. 431-438. Minneapolis, MN: IEE Computer Society.
32. Wilson D, Reeder D (2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, pp. 2000. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Young RL, Badyaev AV (2007) Evolution of ontogeny: linking epigenetic remodeling and genetic adaptation in skeletal structures. Integr Comp Biol 47, 234-244.
34. Young RL, Badyaev AV (2010) Developmental plasticity links local adaptation and evolutionary diversification in foraging morphology. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 314B, 434-444.