Ecological deficit and use of natural capital in Luxembourg from 1995 to 2009

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 468-469, Issue , 2014, Pages 292-301

  Rugani, Benedetto ^a   Roviani, Davide ^a   Hild, Paula ^a   Schmitt, Bianca ^a   Benetto, Enrico ^a  

^a LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Ecological deficit; Ecological footprint; Emergy; Environmentally extended input output; Natural capital; Net consumption

Indexed keywords

SOLAR ENERGY;

ECOLOGICAL DEFICIT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; EMERGY; INPUT-OUTPUT; NATURAL CAPITAL; NET CONSUMPTION;

ECOLOGY;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; EMERGY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; RESOURCE SCARCITY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECOLOGICAL DEFICIT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAND USE; LUXEMBOURG; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NATURAL CAPITAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLAR ENERGY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BELGIUM; LUXEMBOURG [BELGIUM];

ECOLOGICAL DEFICIT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; EMERGY; ENVIRONMENTALLY EXTENDED INPUT-OUTPUT; NATURAL CAPITAL; NET CONSUMPTION;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; LUXEMBOURG; MODELS, ECONOMIC; SOLAR ENERGY;

EID: 84884201541     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.122     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Agostinho F., Diniz G., Siche R., Ortega E. The use of emergy assessment and the geographical information system in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil. Ecol Model 2008, 210:37-57.
2. Allegrezza S., Brosius J., Gerber P., Hausman P., Langers J., Schuller G., et al. Les salariés frontaliers dans l'économie luxembourgeoise. Cahier CEPS/INSTEAD - STATEC n° 100 Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.statistiques.public.lu/catalogue-publications/cahiers-economiques/2005/PDF-Cahier-100-2005.pdf.
3. Bagliani M., Galli A., Niccolucci V., Marchettini N. Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: the case of the Province of Siena (Italy). J Environ Manag 2008, 86(2):354-364.
4. Barber J. Production consumption and the world summit on sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 2003, 5:63-93.
5. Bastianoni S., Niccolucci V., Pulselli R.M., Marchettini N. Indicator and indicandum: "sustainable way" vs "prevailing conditions" in the ecological footprint. Ecol Ind 2012, 16:47-50.
6. Berger F. Développement de l'emploi transfrontalier au Luxembourg et portrait sociodémographique des frontaliers. CEPS/INSTEAD 2005 coll. Population & Emploi n°08 Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.ceps.lu/?type=module&id=104&tmp=1059.
7. Borucke M., Moore D., Cranston G., Gracey K., Iha K., Larson J., et al. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Ind 2013, 24:518-533.
8. Brown M.T., Ulgiati S. Emergy evaluation of the biosphere and natural capital. Ambio 1999, 28:486-493.
9. Butchard S.H.M., et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328(5982):1164-1168.
10. Carey R.O., Migliaccio K.W., Brown M.T. Nutrient discharges to Biscayne Bay, Florida: trends, loads, and a pollutant index. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:530-539.
11. Cho C.-J. An exploration of reliable methods of estimating emergy requirements at the regional scale: Traditional emergy analysis regional thermodynamic input-output analysis or the conservation rule-implicit method. Ecol Model 2013, 251:288-296.
12. Chomard F., Ruffini C., Tibesar A. Les flux frontaliers dans la Grande Région. CEPS/INSTEAD 2005 coll. Cahiers transfrontaliers d'EURES n°2005-04 Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.ceps.lu/?type=module&id=104&tmp=1228.
13. 2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:5687-5692.
14. De Brabanter E., Schuman M. Luxembourg's National Inventory Report 1990-2007. Ministry of the 2009, Environment & Environment Agency, Luxembourg.
15. EEA-European Environment Agency Greenhouse gas emission data and EU ETS data Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer.
16. EFAMA-European Fund and Asset Management Association Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.efama.org/SitePages/.
17. Ekins P., Simon S., Deutsch L., Folke C., De Groot R. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecol Econ 2003, 44:165-185.
18. Eureapa Scenario Modelling and Policy Assessment Tool 2011, One Planet Economy Network, [Available at: https://www.eureapa.net/explore/ (last access June 2013)].
19. Eurostat Eurostat Manual of Supply Use and Input-Output Tables. Catalogue No KS-RA-07-013-EN-N 2008, 591. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, [Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-RA-07-013/EN/KS-RA-07-013-EN.PDF (last access June 2013)].
20. Eurostat web dataset Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/National_accounts_%E2%80%93_GDP.
21. Ewing B.R., Hawkins T.R., Wiedmann T.O., Galli A., Ercin A.E., Weinzettel J., et al. Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input-output framework. Ecol Ind 2012, 23:1-8.
22. Fiala N. Measuring sustainability: why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol Econ 2008, 67:519-525.
23. Galli A., Kitzes J., Wermer P., Wackernagel M., Niccolucci V., Tiezzi E. An exploration of the mathematics behind the ecological footprint. Int J Ecodyn 2007, 2:250-257.
24. Galli A., Kitzes J., Niccolucci V., Wackernagel M., Wada Y., Marchettini N. Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the ecological footprint: a focus on China and India. Ecol Ind 2012, 17:99-107.
25. Galli A., Wiedmann T.O., Ercin A.E., Knoblauch D., Ewing B.R., Giljum S. Integrating ecological carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Ind 2012, 16:100-112.
26. Galli A., Weinzettel J., Cranston G., Ercin E. A footprint family extended MRIO model to support Europe's transition to a one planet economy. Sci Total Environ 2013, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.071.
27. Gasparatos A., El-Haram M., Horner M. A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2008, 28:286-311.
28. GFN-Global Footprint Network Ecological Footprint Standards 2009 2009, Global Footprint Network, Oakland, [Available at: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/Ecological_Footprint_Standards_2009.pdf (last access June 2013)].
29. Hanafiah M.M., Hendriks A.J., Huijbregts M.A.J. Comparing the ecological footprint with the biodiversity footprint of products. J Clean Prod 2012, 37:107-114.
30. Herva M., Franco A., Ferreiro S., Álvarez A., Roca E. An approach for the application of the ecological footprint as environmental indicator in the textile sector. J Hazard Mater 2008, 156(1):478-487.
31. Hild P. Ecological footprint (update 1) tables and figures: Luxembourg's consumption footprint 2000-2008 (NFA 2011 edition). CRP Henri Tudor: Luxembourg;2013 (report unpublished).
32. Hild P., Schmitt B., Decoville A., Mey M., Welfring J. The ecological footprint of Luxembourg-technical report (version 4.0) 2010, CRP Henri Tudor/CRTE, Luxembourg, [Available at: http://www.myfootprint.lu/files/RAP-20100614-EF_Lux_Phase_2-v.4.0.pdf (last access June 2013)].
33. Hild P., Takagi A., Schmitt B. Ecological Footprint-Trend Analysis and Interpretation of Luxembourg's Consumption Footprint NFA 2010 edition data years 2000-2007. Perspectives de Politique Économique No.23 September 2012 2012, Observatoire de la Compétitivité Ministry of the Economy and Foreign Trade Luxembourg, [Available at: http://www.odc.public.lu/publications/perspectives/PPE_023.pdf (last access June 2013)].
34. Hischier R., Weidema B., Althaus H.-J., Bauer C., Doka G., 'Dones R., et al. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Ecoinvent Report No. 3, v2.2 2010, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH.
35. Huang S.-L., Chen Y.-H., Kuo F.-Y., Wang S.-H. Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 2011, 8:38-50.
36. Huijbregts M.A.J., Hellweg S., Frischknecht R., Hungerbuhler K., Hendriks A.J. Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecol Econ 2008, 64:798-807.
37. Ingwersen W.W. Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica. J Clean Prod 2012, 3:152-163.
38. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC guideline for national greenhouse gas inventories 2006, IGES, Japan, [Available at: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html (last access June 2013)]. H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe (Eds.).
39. Joshi S. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. J Ind Ecol 1999, 3:95-120.
40. Jungbluth N., Nathani C., Stucki M., Leuenberger M. Environmental impacts of Swiss consumption and production. A combination of input-output analysis with life cycle assessment. Environmental studies no. 1111 (CH) 2011, Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, [171 pp.].
41. Jury C., Rugani B., Hild P., May M., Benetto E. Analysis of complementary methodologies to assess the environmental impact of Luxembourg's net consumption. Environ Sci Pol 2013, 27:68-80.
42. Kitzes J., Wackernagel M. Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecol Ind 2009, 9:812-817.
43. Kitzes J., Galli A., Rizk S.M., Reed A., Wackernagel M. Guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts: 2008 Edition 2008, Global Footprint, Network, Oakland.
44. Kitzes J., et al. A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:1991-2007.
45. Larsen H.N., Hertwich E.G. The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environ Sci Pol 2009, 12:791-798.
46. Lenzen M., Kanemoto K., Moran D., Geschke A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(15):8374-8381.
47. Leontief W.W. Input-Output Economics 1966, Oxford University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
48. Liao W., Heijungs R., Huppes G. Thermodynamic resource indicators in LCA: a case study on the titania produced in Panzhihua city, southwest China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2012, 17(8):951-961.
49. Mathias J. Le profil du frontalier: entre choix et opportunités. Economie Lorraine Décembre 2003 - n°229 Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.insee.fr/fr/insee_regions/lor/themes/EL/EL229A/EL229A.pdf.
50. MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://www.unep.org/maweb/.
51. Mellino S., Ripa M., Zucaro A., Ulgiati S. An emergy-GIS approach to the evaluation of renewable resource flows: a case study of Campania Region Italy. Ecol Model 2013, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.023.
52. Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 2004, 1:231-246.
53. Munda G. "Measuring sustainability": a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 2005, 7:117-134.
54. Niccolucci V., Galli A., Kitzes J., Pulselli R.M., Borsa S., Marchettini N. Ecological footprint analysis applied to the production of two Italian wines. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008, 128(3):162-166.
55. Niccolucci V., Tiezzi E., Pulselli F.M., Capineri C. Biocapacity vs ecological footprint of world regions: a geopolitical interpretation. Ecol Ind 2011, 16:100-112.
56. Núñez M., Antón A., Muñoz P., Rieradevall J. Inclusion of soil erosion impacts in life cycle assessment on a global scale: application to energy crops in Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18(4):755-767.
57. Odum H.T. Self-organization transformity and information. Science 1988, 242:1132-1140.
58. Odum H.T. The emergy of natural capital. Investing in Natural Capital 1994, 200-214. Island Press, Covelo, CA. A.M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Falke, R. Costanza (Eds.).
59. Odum H.T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making 1996, John Wiley and Sons, New York USA.
60. Odum H.T., Odum E.P. The energetic basis for valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 2000, 3:21-23.
61. Panasiuk D., Hild P., Arbault D., Benetto E. Etude préliminaire d'emploi d'une démarche TEEB (The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity) au Luxembourg. Rapport final 2013.
62. Patterson M.G. Are all processes equally efficient from an emergy perspective? Analysis of ecological and economic networks using matrix algebra methods. Ecol Model 2012, 226:77-91.
63. Peters G.P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol Econ 2008, 65:13-23.
64. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42(5):1401-1407.
65. Ponthiere G. The ecological footprint: an exhibit at an intergenerational trial?. Environ Dev Sustain 2009, 11:677-694.
66. Pulselli R.M. Integrating emergy evaluation and geographic information systems for monitoring resource use in the Abruzzo Region (Italy). J Environ Manage 2010, 91(11):2349-2357.
67. Pulselli F.M., Coscieme L., Bastianoni S. Ecosystem services as a counterpart of emergy flows to ecosystems. Ecol Model 2011, 222:2924-2928.
68. Raugei M. Emergy indicators applied to human economic systems-a word of caution. Ecol Model 2011, 222:3821-3822.
69. Rees W.E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 1992, 4(2):121-130.
70. Ridolfi R., Bastianoni Emergy. Encycl Ecol 2008, 1218-1228.
71. Rugani B., Huijbregts M.A.J., Mutel C., Bastianoni S., Hellweg S. Solar energy demand (SED) of commodity life cycles. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:5426-5430.
72. Rugani B., Panasiuk D., Benetto E. An input-output based framework to evaluate human labour in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2012, 17(6):795-812.
73. Rugani B., Benetto E., Arbault D., Tiruta-Barna L. Emergy-based mid-point valuation of ecosystem goods and services for life cycle impact assessment. Rev Metall-Paris 2013, 10.1051/metal/2013067.
74. Statec-Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg Luxembourg in figures 2012, Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg, [Available at: http://www.statistiques.public.lu/catalogue-publications/luxembourg-en-chiffres/luxembourg-figures.pdf (last access June 2013).].
75. Statec-Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg Emploi et chÔmage par mois 1995-2013 2013, Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg, [Available at: http://www.statistiques.public.lu/stat/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=5237&IF_Language=fra&MainTheme=2&FldrName=3 (last access June 2013)].
76. Steen-Olsen K., Weinzettel J., Cranston G., Ercin A.E., Hertwich E.G. Carbon land and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption production and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(20):10883-10891.
77. Suh S. Functions commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model. Ecol Econ 2004, 48:451-467.
78. Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology. Series "Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science" 2009, vol. 23:884. Springer. S. Suh (Ed.).
79. Suh S., Lenzen M., Treloar G.J., Hondo H., Horvath A., Huppes G., et al. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38(3):657-664.
80. Tukker A., Poliakov E., Heijungs R., Hawkins T., Neuwahl F., Rueda-Cantuche J.M., et al. Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database. Ecol Econ 2009, 68(7):1928-1937.
81. Ulgiati S., Zucaro A., Franzese P.P. Shared wealth or nobody's land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:778-787.
82. Wackernagel M., Rees W. Our ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on Earth 1996, New Society Publishers, Canada. 6th ed.
83. Wackernagel M., Schulz N.B., Deumling D., Linares A.C., Jenkins M., Kapos V., et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:9266-9270.
84. Wackernagel M., Monfreda C., Erb K.H., Haberl H., Schulz N.B. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an 'actual land area' approach. Land Use Pol 2004, 21(3):261-269.
85. Watanabe M.D.B., Ortega E. Ecosystem services and biogeochemical cycles on a global scale: valuation of water carbon and nitrogen processes. Environ Sci Pol 2011, 14:594-604.
86. Weinzettel J., Hertwich E.G., Peters G.Z., Steen-Olsen K., Galli A. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Glob Environ Chang 2013, 23(2):433-438.
87. Wiedmann T.O. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 2009, 69:211-222.
88. Wiedmann T.O., Barrett J. A review of the ecological footprint indicator-perceptions and methods. Sustainability 2010, 2:1645-1693.
89. Wiedmann T.O., Lenzen M. On the conversion between local and global hectares in ecological footprint analysis. Ecol Econ 2007, 60:673-677.
90. Wiedmann T.O., Minx J., Barrett J., Wackernagel M. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecol Econ 2006, 56:28-48.
91. Wiedmann T.O., Wilting H.C., Lenzen M., Lutter S., Palm V. Quo vadis MRIO? Methodological data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-Output analysis. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:1937-1945.
92. World Bank Statistical data section Available at:, [last access June 2013]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
93. Yang Y., Suh S. Environmental impacts of products in China. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:4102-4109.