State pre-emption, local control, and alcohol retail outlet density regulation

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 399-405

  Mosher, James F ^a   Treffers, Ryan D ^a  

^a Alcohol Policy Consultations   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; GOVERNMENT; LAW; LAW SUIT; LICENSING; POLICY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PROFESSIONAL DELEGATION; REVIEW; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; COMMERCE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884178137     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.029     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bouchery E, Harwood H, Sacks J, Simon C, Brewer R. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:516-24.
2. CDC. Alcohol-attributable deaths and years of potential life lost-U.S., 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:866-70.
3. Guide to Community Preventive Services. Preventing excessive alcohol consumption, 2012. www.thecommunityguide.org/alcohol/index. html.
4. Naimi T, Nelson D, Brewer R. The intensity of binge alcohol consumption among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:201-7.
5. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. www.thecommunityguide. org/about/task-force-members.html.
6. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations on privatization of alcohol retail sales and prevention of excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Am J Prev Med 2012;42:428-9.
7. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms by limiting alcohol outlet density. Am J Prev Med 2009;6:570-1.
8. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Increasing alcoholic beverage taxes is recommended to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:230-2.
9. Gorovitz E, Pertschuk M, Mosher J. Pre-emption or prevention? Lessons from efforts to control f?rearms, alcohol and tobacco. J Public Health Policy 1998;19(1):37-50.
10. Pertschuk M, Pomeranz J, Aoki J, Larkin M, Paloma M. Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health: a framework for decision makers. J Public Health Manag Pract 2012: in press (advance copy, www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/law/PreemptionFramework-JPHMP- 6.12.pdf) .
11. U.S. Constitution, 10th Amendment.
12. U.S. Constitution, 21st Amendment.
13. Diller P. Intrastate preemption. Boston. L. Rev. 2007; 87:1114-75.
14. Viva! International Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc., 41 Cal.4th 929, 935 (2007).
15. Rutkow L, Vernick J, Hodge J, Teret S. Preemption and the obesity epidemic: state and local menu labeling laws and the Nutritional Labeling and Education Act. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:772-89.
16. Mosher J. The perils of preemption. Chicago IL: American Medical Association, 2001. alcoholpolicymd.com/pdf/Policy-Perils.pdf.
17. Nixon M, Mahmoud L, Glantz S. Tobacco industry litigation to deter local public health ordinances: the industry usually loses in court. Tob Control 2004;13:65-73.
18. O'Connor J, MacNeil A, Chriqui J, Tynna M, Bates H, Eidson S. Preemption of local smoke-free air ordinances: the implications of judicial opinions for meeting national health objectives. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:403-12.
19. Jurkiewicz C, Painter M. Why we control alcohol the way we do. In: Jurkiewicz C, Painter M. eds. Social and economic control of alcohol: the 21st Amendment in the 21st century. New York NY: CRC Press, 2008:1-18.
20. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), Alcohol Policy Information System (APIS). www.alcoholpolicy.niaaa. nih.gov.
21. Ashe M, Jernigan D, Kline R, Galaz R. Land use planning and the control of alcohol, tobacco, f?rearms, and fast food restaurants. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1404-8.
22. Wittman F. Community control of alcohol and drug risk environments: the California experience. Subst Use Misuse 2007;42:1835-49.
23. Floresta Inc. v. City Council, 190 Cal.App.2d 599, 605 (1961).
24. Campbell C, Hahn R, Elder R, et al. The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:556-69.
25. Tremper C, Thomas S, Wagenaar AC. Measuring law for evaluation research. Eval Rev 2010;34:242-66.
26. Mosher J, Cannon C, Treffers R. Reducing community problems associated with alcohol sales: the case of deemed approved ordinances in California. Oxnard CA: Ventura County Behavioral Health Department, 2009. www.venturacountylimits. org/resources/article/B881CB/reducing-community-alcohol-problems-associated- with-alcohol-salesthe-case-of-deemed-approved-ordinances-in-california.
27. Cohen E, Mosher J. Local control of retail alcohol availability in Georgia: a legal analysis. Felton CA: Alcohol Policy Consultations, 2011. www.alcoholpolicyconsultations.com/storage/Georgia%20preemption% 20legal%20analysis%205%202011.pdf.
28. Cohen E, Mosher J. Local control of retail alcohol availability in Maryland: a legal analysis. Felton CA: Alcohol Policy Consultations, 2011. www.alcoholpolicyconsultations.com/storage/MD%20preemption% 20state%20analysis%2012%202011.pdf.
29. Mosher J. Local control of alcohol availability in Nebraska: a legal analysis. Omaha: NE: Project Extra Mile, 2011. www.alcoholpolicyconsultations. com/storage/Nebraska%20preemption%20state%20analysis%202010.pdf.
30. Mosher J, Pezzolesi R, Treffers R. The impact of strict state preemption on the regulation of alcohol outlet density: the case of New York State. Felton CA:Alcohol Policy Consultations, 2011. www.alcoholpolicyconsultations.com/ storage/NY%20preemption%20state%20analysis%208%202011.pdf.
31. Mosher J. Alcohol retail availability regulation in Wisconsin. Presentation at the Alcohol Policy in Wisconsin: Promoting Changes to Reduce High Risk Alcohol Use seminar, September 21, 2011. www. alcoholpolicyconsultations.com/storage/Wisconsin%20Preemption% 20State%20Analysis%2011%202011.pdf.
32. CCH, Inc. Liquor Control Law Reporter. Riverwoods IL: CCH, Inc. 2012. intelliconnect.cch.com/scion/secure/index.jsp#page[1].
33. City of Oakland v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. App.4th 740 (1996), review denied.