Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1140-1146

  Mani, Sriniwasan B ^a   Brown, Haydée C ^a   Nair, Pallavi ^a   Chen, Lan ^b   Do, Huong T ^a   Lyman, Stephen ^a   Deland, Jonathan T ^a   Ellis, Scott J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

adult acquired flatfoot deformity; AOFAS; clinical rating systems; FAOS validation; outcome studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT ACQUIRED FLATFOOT DEFORMITY; ANKLE INSTABILITY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FLATFOOT; HALLUX VALGUS; HEALTH; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 12; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ADULT ACQUIRED FLATFOOT DEFORMITY; AOFAS; CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS; FAOS VALIDATION; OUTCOME STUDIES;

ADULT; FLATFOOT; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884153765     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: 19447876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1071100713483117     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Button G, Pinney S. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 ; 25: 521-525
2. Canseco K, Long J, Smedberg T, Tarima S, Marks RM, Harris GF. Multisegmental foot and ankle motion analysis after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 ; 33: 141-147
3. Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, et al. Validation of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 1145 ; 33 :
4. Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, et al. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 ; 94: 215-221
5. Ellis SJ, Williams BR, Wagshul AD, Pavlov H, Deland JT. Deltoid ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft in flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 ; 31: 781-789
6. Ellis SJ, Yu JC, Johnson AH, Elliott A, O'Malley M, Deland J. Plantar pressures in patients with and without lateral foot pain after lateral column lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 ; 92: 81-91
7. Fleiss JL Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley ; 1981 :
8. Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 ; 87: 2006-2011
9. Kocher MS, Smith JT, Iversen MD, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a modified International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (Pedi-IKDC) in children with knee disorders. Am J Sports Med. 2011 ; 39: 933-939
10. Kocher R, Emanuel EJ, DeParle NA. The Affordable Care Act and the future of clinical medicine: the opportunities and challenges. Ann Intern Med. 2010 ; 153: 536-539
11. Marsh JL, Rattay RE, Dulaney T. Results of ankle arthrodesis for treatment of supramalleolar nonunion and ankle arthrosis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997 ; 18: 138-143
12. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski MF. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 ; 79: 1323-1335
13. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Lalonde KA, Conti S. Current concepts review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 ; 27: 383-390
14. Myerson MS, Badekas A, Schon LC. Treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon deficiency with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 ; 25: 445-450
15. Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 ; 15: 126-134
16. Pinsker E, Daniels TR. AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 ; 32: 841-842
17. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001 ; 22: 788-794
18. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998 ; 8: 439-448
19. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 ; 28: 88-96
20. SooHoo NF, Samimi DB, Vyas RM, Botzler T. Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 ; 27: 38-42
21. SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society: evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 2003 ; 24: 50-55
22. Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989 ; 262: 925-930
23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 ; 60: 34-42
24. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 ; 30: 473-483
25. Williams BR, Ellis SJ, Deyer TW, Pavlov H, Deland JT. Reconstruction of the spring ligament using a peroneus longus autograft tendon transfer. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 ; 31: 567-577