Factors influencing the decision to offer immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): The institut gustave roussy breast cancer study group experience

Breast

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 673-675

  Naoura, Iptissem ^a   Mazouni, Chafika ^a   Ghanimeh, Joseph ^a   Leymarie, Nicolas ^a   Garbay, Jean Rémi ^a   Karsenti, Guillaume ^a   Sarfati, Benjamin ^a   Leduey, Alexandre ^a   Kolb, Frédéric ^a   Delaloge, Suzette ^a   Rimareix, Françoise ^a  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast implant; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Immediate breast reconstruction; Mastectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; DATA EXTRACTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; OBESITY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SURGEON; TOBACCO; TREATMENT INDICATION;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMPLANT; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; MASTECTOMY;

AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; COMMUNICATION; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY, MODIFIED RADICAL; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84884147434     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kerlikowske K. Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. JNatl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010, 2010:139-141.
2. Li C., Daling J., Malone K. Age-specific incidence rates of in situ breast carcinomas by histologic type, 1980 to 2001. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005, 14:1008-1011.
3. Virnig B.A., Shamliyan T., Tuttle T.M., Kane R.L., Wilt T.J. Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep Technol Assess 2009, 185:1-549. Full Rep.
4. Baxter N.N., Virnig B.A., Durham S.B., Tuttle T.M. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JNatl Cancer Inst 2004, 96:443-448.
5. Hwang E.S. The impact of surgery on ductal carcinoma in situ outcomes: the use of mastectomy. JNatl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010, 2010:197-199.
6. Rosenqvist S., Sandelin K., Wickman M. Patients' psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996, 22:262-266.
7. Morrow M. Treatment selection in ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 2001, 8:275-282.
8. Crespo L.D., Eberlein T.J., O'Connor N., Hergrueter C.A., Pribaz J.J., Eriksson E. Postmastectomy complications in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994, 32:452-456.
9. Malata C.M., McIntosh S.A., Purushotham A.D. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2000, 87:1455-1472.
10. Romics L., Chew B.K., Weiler-Mithoff E., Doughty J.C., Brown I.M., Stallard S., et al. Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2012, 99:799-806.
11. Eriksen C., Frisell J., Wickman M., Lidbrink E., Krawiec K., Sandelin K. Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011, 127:439-446.
12. Harrell F.E. Regression modeling strategies 2001, Springer, New York.
13. Ananian P., Houvenaeghel G., Protière C., Rouanet P., Arnaud S., Moatti J.P., et al. Determinants of patients' choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004, 11:762-771.
14. Preminger B.A., Trencheva K., Chang C.S., Chiang A., El-Tamer M., Ascherman J., et al. Improving access to care: breast surgeons, the gatekeepers to breast reconstruction. JAm Coll Surg 2012, 214:270-276.
15. Howard-McNatt M., Forsberg C., Levine E.A., DeFranzo A., Marks M., David L. Breast cancer reconstruction in the elderly. Am Surg 2011, 77:1640-1643.
16. Alderman A.K., Wilkins E.G., Kim H.M., Lowery J.C. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:2265-2274.
17. Lin K.Y., Johns F.R., Gibson J., Long M., Drake D.B., Moore M.M. An outcome study of breast reconstruction: presurgical identification of risk factors for complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2001, 8:586-591.
18. Woerdeman L.A., Hage J.J., Hofland M.M., Rutgers E.J. Aprospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 119:455-463.
19. Pinsolle V., Grinfeder C., Mathoulin-Pelissier S., Faucher A. Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. JPlast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006, 59:1017-1024.
20. Izquierdo F., Gracia J., Guerra M., Blasco J.A., Andradas E. Health technology assessment-based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011, 27:363-368.
21. Rowland J.H., Desmond K.A., Meyerowitz B.E., Belin T.R., Wyatt G.E., Ganz P.A. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. JNatl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1422-1429.
22. Waljee J.F., Ubel P.A., Atisha D.M., Hu E.S., Alderman A.K. The choice for breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma?. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:2477-2482.
23. Damen T.H., de Bekker-Grob E.W., Mureau M.A., Menke-Pluijmers M.B., Seynaeve C., Hofer S.O., et al. Patients' preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. JPlast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011, 64:75-83.
24. Meretoja T.J., Heikkilä P.S., Salmenkivi K., Leidenius M.H. Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19:2345-2351.
25. Ansari B., Boughey J.C., Adamczyk D.L., Degnim A.C., Jakub J.W., Morton M.J. Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?. Am J Surg 2012, 204:290-293.
26. Intra M., Rotmensz N., Veronesi P., Colleoni M., Iodice S., Paganelli G., et al. Sentinel node biopsy is not a standard procedure in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the experience of the European institute of oncology on 854 patients in 10 years. Ann Surg 2008, 247:315-319.
27. Margalit D.N., Sreedhara M., Chen Y.H., Catalano P.J., Nguyen P.L., Golshan M., et al. Microinvasive breast cancer: ER, PR, and HER-2/neu status and clinical outcomes after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012 Sep 7.
28. Downes K.J., Glatt B.S., Kanchwala S.K., Mick R., Fraker D.L., Fox K.R., et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 103:906-913.
29. Alderman A.K., Collins E.D., Schott A., Hughes M.E., Ottesen R.A., Theriault R.L., et al. The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy. Cancer 2010, 116:1791-1800.
30. Jhaveri J.D., Rush S.C., Kostroff K., Derisi D., Farber L.A., Maurer V.E., et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 72:859-865.
31. Shah C., Kundu N., Arthur D., Vicini F. Radiation therapy following postmastectomy reconstruction: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2012 Oct 8.