Virtual airway simulation to improve dexterity among novices performing fibreoptic intubation

Anaesthesia

Volumn 68, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1053-1058

  De Oliveira, G S ^a   Glassenberg, R ^a   Chang, R ^a   Fitzgerald, P ^a   McCarthy, R J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY MONITORING SYSTEM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBEROSCOPE; FIBERSCOPE ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOBILE PHONE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDOSCOPY; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNX; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOFTWARE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84884144550     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12379     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ,. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2009; 109: 1870-80.
2. Woodall N, Frerk C, Cook TM,. Can we make airway management (even) safer?-lessons from national audit. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 27-33.
3. Husain T, Gatward JJ, Hambidge OR, et al. Strategies to prevent airway complications: a survey of adult intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 108: 800-6.
4. Connor CW, Segal S,. Accurate classification of difficult intubation by computerized facial analysis. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2011; 112: 84-93.
5. Dalal PG, Dalal GB, Pott L, et al. Learning curves of novice anesthesiology residents performing simulated fibreoptic upper airway endoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2011; 58: 802-9.
6. Goldmann K, Steinfeldt T,. Acquisition of basic fiberoptic intubation skills with a virtual reality airway simulator. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2006; 18: 173-8.
7. Naik VN, Matsumoto ED, Houston PL, et al. Fiberoptic orotracheal intubation on anesthetized patients: do manipulation skills learned on a simple model transfer into the operating room? Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 343-8.
8. Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D,. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Academic Medicine 1998; 73: 993-7.
9. Mhyre JM, Healy D,. The unanticipated difficult intubation in obstetrics. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2011; 112: 648-52.
10. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; 106: 617-31.
11. Ezri T, Szmuk P, Warters RD, et al. Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States: have we made any progress? Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2003; 15: 418-22.
12. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM,. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine 2006; 81: 207-12.
13. Cumin D, Weller JM, Henderson K, Merry AF,. Standards for simulation in anaesthesia: creating confidence in the tools. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2010; 105: 45-51.
14. Rowe R, Cohen RA,. An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 95: 62-6.
15. Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O, 3rd,. Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training. Chest 2001; 120: 1333-9.
16. Rai MR, Popat MT,. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin? Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1-3.
17. Castle N, Pillay Y, Spencer N,. Insertion of six different supraglottic airway devices whilst wearing chemical, biological, radiation, nuclear-personal protective equipment: a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 983-8.