Peer Review and Pathology Working Groups

Haschek and Rousseaux's Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 551-564

  Mann, Peter C ^a   Hardisty, Jerry F ^b  

^a EPL Experimental Pathology Laboratories Inc   (United States)

^b EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY LABORATORIES INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Complete review animals; Digital peer review; Documentation; Formal peer review; Informal peer review; Locking data; Pathology peer review; Pathology working group (PWG); Peer review statement; Regulatory requirements; Retrospective peer review; Sources of disagreement; Target tissues

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883977690     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-415759-0.00017-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Boorman G.A., Wolf D.C., Francke-Carroll S., Maronpot R.R. Pathology Peer Review. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 38(7):1009-1010.
2. Boorman G.A., Haseman J.K., Waters M.D., Hardisty J.F., Sills R.C. Quality review procedures necessary for rodent pathology databases and toxicogenomic studies: the National Toxicology Program experience. Toxicol. Pathol. 2002, 30(1):88-92.
3. Crissman J.W., Goodman D.G., Hildebrandt P.K., Maronpot R.R., Prater D.A., Riley J.H., Seaman W.J., Thake D.C. Best practices guideline: Toxicologic histopathology. Toxicol. Pathol. 2004, 32:126-131.
4. Eighmy J.J. Study pathologist perspective of pathology peer review. Toxicol. Pathol. 1996, 24(5):647-649.
5. Environmental Protection Agency Pesticide registration (PR) notice94-5: Requests for re-considerations of carcinogenicity peer review decisions based on changes in pathology diagnoses 1994, last accessed October 2, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/pr94-5.html.
6. European Medicines Agency Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products Note for guidance on carcinogenic potential 2002, last accessed September 29, 2011. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin e/2009/09/WC500003258.pdf.
7. Frame S.R., Mann P.C. Principles of Pathology for Toxicology Studies. Principles and Methods of Toxicology 2008, 591-609. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 5th edition. A.W. Hayes (Ed.).
8. Franz J.D. Letter to the Editor [on pathology peer review]. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997, 25(3):335-337.
9. Gosselin S.J., Palate B., Parker G.A., Engelhardt J.A., Hardisty J.F., McDorman K.S., Tellier P.A., Silverman L.R. Industry-Contract Research Organization Pathology Interactions: A Perspective of Contract Research Organizations in Producing the Best Quality Pathology Report. Toxicol. Pathol 2011, 39:422-428.
10. Hardisty J.F., Boorman G.A. National Toxicology Program pathology quality assurance procedures. Managing Conduct and Data Quality of Toxicology Studies 1986, 263-269. Princeton Scientific Publishing, Princeton, NJ. K.B. Hoover, J.K. Baldwin, A.F. Velner, C.E. Whitmire, C.L. Davies, D.W. Bristol (Eds.).
11. Hardisty J.F., Eustis S.L. Toxicological pathology: A critical stage in study interpretation. Progress in Predictive Toxicology 1990, 41-62. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam. D.B. Clayson, I.C. Munro, P. Shubik, J.A. Swenberg (Eds.).
12. Lepore P.D. Pathology Raw Data. Toxicol. Pathol. 1996, 24(1):147.
13. Long G. Perspectives on pathology peer review. Toxicol. Pathol. 1996, 24(5):645-646.
14. Mann P.C. Pathology peer review from the perspective of an external peer review pathologist. Toxicol. Pathol. 1996, 24:650-653.
15. Mann P.C., Hardisty J.F., Parker M.D. Managing Pitfalls in Toxicologic Pathology. Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology 2002, 187-206. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd edition. W.M. Haschek, C.G. Rousseaux, M.A. Wallig (Eds.).
16. McCullough B.M., Valerio G., Miller G., Pino M., Mirsky M. Letter to the editor [on pathology peer review]. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997, 25:337-338.
17. McKay J.S., Barale-Thomas E., Bolon B., George C., Hardisty J., Manabe S., Schorsch F., Teranishi M., Weber K. A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 38:508-510.
18. Morton D., Kemp R.K., Francke-Carroll S., Jensen K., McCartney J., Monticello T.M., Perry R., Pulido O., Roome N., Schafer K., Sellers R., Snyder P.W. Best practices for reporting pathology interpretations within GLP toxicology studies. Toxicol. Pathol. 2006, 34:806-809.
19. Morton D., Sellers R.S., Barale-Thomas E., Bolon B., George C., Hardisty J.F., Irizarry A., McKay J.S., Odin M., Teranishi M. Recommendations for pathology peer review. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 38:1118-1127.
20. Peters T.S. Pathology Peer Review - A concept for consideration. Toxicol. Pathol 1996, 24:654-656.
21. Sahota P. Letter to the editor [on pathology peer review]. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997, 25:337.
22. Squire R.A. A Quarter Century of Toxicologic Pathology: A Personal Perspective. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997, 25:423-425.
23. The Society of Toxicologic Pathologists Documentation of pathology peer review. Position of the Society of Toxicologic Pathologists. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997, 25(6):655.
24. The Society of Toxicologic Pathologists Peer review in toxicologic pathology: some recommendations. Toxicol. Pathol. 1991, 19:290-292.
25. United States Federal Register Preamble to the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations 1987, 52(172):33768-33782. September. 1.
26. Vahle J., Bradley A., Harada T., Herbert R., Kaufmann W., Kellner R., Mann P., Pyrah I., Rittinghausen S., Tanaka T. The International Nomenclature Project: An Update. Toxicol. Pathol. 2009, 37:694-697.
27. Ward J.M., Hardisty J.F., Hailey J.R., Streett C.S. Peer review in toxicologic pathology. Toxicol. Pathol. 1995, 23(2):226-234.
28. Young G.D., Hardisty J., Leininger J.F., Iverson W.O., Potts S., Mann P.C., Tomlinson M.J., Eighmy J. Virtual Imaging Peer Review (VIPER) - A Case Study - Poster presented at the Society of Toxicologic Pathology, 30th Annual Symposium 2011, June 19-23, 2011, Denver, CO.