-
1
-
-
84884003862
-
-
This particular quotation from Lord Kelvin (then William Thomson) is from Macmillan's Magazine (5 March, he repeated his argument in several later articles
-
This particular quotation from Lord Kelvin (then William Thomson) is from Macmillan's Magazine (5 March 1862), p. 288; he repeated his argument in several later articles.
-
(1862)
, pp. 288
-
-
-
2
-
-
84884113354
-
-
These instruments would consist of four or five telescopes in space, arrayed as an interferometer so that the light from the star itself cancels out by interference (the peaks of waves from one telescope neutralizing the troughs from the other) and won't drown out the light from any (far fainter) planet
-
These instruments would consist of four or five telescopes in space, arrayed as an interferometer so that the light from the star itself cancels out by interference (the peaks of waves from one telescope neutralizing the troughs from the other) and won't drown out the light from any (far fainter) planet.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
84883908885
-
The quote is from Lemaître's popular book
-
Kluwer
-
The quote is from Lemaître's popular book, The Primordial Atom (Kluwer, 1953).
-
(1953)
The Primordial Atom
-
-
-
4
-
-
84883995629
-
American Scientist
-
The quote is from
-
The quote is from J. A.Wheeler, American Scientist 56, 1 (1968).
-
(1968)
, vol.56
, Issue.1
-
-
Wheeler, J.A.1
-
5
-
-
84883938683
-
reprinted in Truth and Beauty
-
Quoted from a 1975 lecture by, University of Chicago Press
-
Quoted from a 1975 lecture by S. Chandrasekhar, reprinted in Truth and Beauty (University of Chicago Press, 1987), p. 54.
-
(1987)
, pp. 54
-
-
Chandrasekhar, S.1
-
6
-
-
84883905748
-
-
Penrose's views on black holes and on other issues quoted here, are summarized in his book The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford University Press
-
Penrose's views on black holes and on other issues quoted here, are summarized in his book The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford University Press, 1988).
-
(1988)
-
-
-
7
-
-
4644287555
-
Scientific American
-
The quote is from an article by, January
-
The quote is from an article by J. Ostriker and P. Steinhart in Scientific American, January 2001.
-
(2001)
-
-
Ostriker, J.1
Steinhart, P.2
-
8
-
-
84884113524
-
These heavy-ion experiments are the ones that have triggered the unease
-
mentioned in chapter 8) regarding the risk of a runaway conversion of everything into strange matter
-
These heavy-ion experiments are the ones that have triggered the unease (mentioned in chapter 8) regarding the risk of a runaway conversion of everything into strange matter.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
0030602125
-
Nuclear Physics
-
The quantitative implications of the Oklo reactor for the constancy of various physical "constants" were reviewed and improved by, This article gives reference to earlier work
-
The quantitative implications of the Oklo reactor for the constancy of various physical "constants" were reviewed and improved by F. J. Dyson and T. Damour in Nuclear Physics B480 (1996): 37-54. This article gives reference to earlier work.
-
(1996)
, vol.480 B
, pp. 37-54
-
-
Dyson, F.J.1
Damour, T.2
-
10
-
-
34247953814
-
More Is different
-
A classic exposition of this viewpoint is Philip Anderson's
-
A classic exposition of this viewpoint is Philip Anderson's "More Is different," Science 177 (1972): 393-96.
-
(1972)
Science
, vol.177
, pp. 393-396
-
-
-
11
-
-
84884071265
-
See Steven Weinberg's Dreams of a Final Theory
-
Pantheon
-
See Steven Weinberg's Dreams of a Final Theory (Pantheon, 1993).
-
(1993)
-
-
-
12
-
-
84884076550
-
-
In Advice to a Young Scientist by, Oxford University Press
-
In Advice to a Young Scientist by P.Medawar (Oxford University Press, 1979).
-
(1979)
-
-
Medawar, P.1
-
13
-
-
14844357383
-
Quarks, Chaos and Christianity
-
The quote is from, SPCK Triangle Press
-
The quote is from John Polkinghorne, Quarks, Chaos and Christianity (SPCK Triangle Press, 1994).
-
(1994)
-
-
Polkinghorne, J.1
-
14
-
-
84884002808
-
-
Before Smolin's conjecture can be checked, he needs to make it more specific, particularly in spelling out the precise definition of "optimum." For instance, should the rate of formation, the space density, or the total number of holes in a universe be optimized?
-
Before Smolin's conjecture can be checked, he needs to make it more specific, particularly in spelling out the precise definition of "optimum." For instance, should the rate of formation, the space density, or the total number of holes in a universe be optimized?
-
-
-
|