Primal/dual linear programming and statistical atlases for cartilage segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4792 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 536-543

  Glocker, Ben ^a,b   Komodakis, Nikos ^b,d   Paragios, Nikos ^b   Glaser, Christian ^c   Tziritas, Georgios ^d   Navab, Nassir ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Ecole Centrale de Paris   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE REGISTRATION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MEDICAL IMAGING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CARTILAGE SEGMENTATION; STATISTICAL ATLASES;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA LIGAMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATELLAR LIGAMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROGRAMMING, LINEAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84883843956     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_65     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Yelin, E.: Cost of musculoskeletal diseases: Impact of work disability and functional. J. Rheumatol. 68(Suppl.), 8-11 (2003)
2. Eckstein, F., Cicuttini, F., Raynauld, J., Waterton, J., Peterfly, C.: Magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (oa): morphological assesment. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 14, 46-75 (2006)
3. Kauffmann, C., Gravel, P., Godbout, B., Gravel, A., Beaudoin, G., Raynauld, J.P., MartelPelletier, J., Pelletier, J.P., de Guise, J.: Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using mri: validation study using a synthetic model. IEEE Biomedical Engineering 50(8), 978-988 (2003)
4. Tamez-Pena, J., Barbu-McInnis, M., Totterman, S.: Unsupervised definition of the tibiafemoral joint regions of the human knee and its applications to cartilage analysis. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego (2006)
5. Tang, J., Millington, S., Acton, S., Crandall, J., Hurwitz, S.: Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from mr images using directional gradient vector flow snakes. IEEE Biomedical Engineering 53(5), 896-907 (2006)
6. Folkesson, J., Dam, E., Olsen, O.F., Pettersen, P., Christiansen, C.: Automatic segmentation of the articular cartilage in knee mri using a hierarchical multi-class classification scheme. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
7. Dam, E., Folkesson, J., Pettersen, P., Christiansen, C.: Semi-automatic knee cartilage segmentation. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego (2006)
8. Grau, V., Mewes, A., Alcaniz, M., Kikinis, R., Warfield, S.: Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE Medical Imaging 23(4), 447-458 (2004)
9. Cheong, J., Suter, D., Cicuttini, F.: Development of semi-automatic segmentation methods for measuring tibial cartilage volume. In: Digital Image Computing: Technqiues and Applications, DICTA 2005. Proceedings, pp. 307-314 (2005)
10. Fripp, J., Crozier, S., Warfield, S., Ourselin, S.: Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Physics in Medicine and Biology (2007)
11. Rousson, M., Paragios, N.: Prior knowledge, level set representations and visual grouping. International Journal of Computer Vision (in press)
12. Tikhonov, A.: Ill-posed problems in natural sciences, Coronet (1992)
13. Schnabel, J.A., Rueckert, D., Quist, M., Blackall, J.M., Castellano-Smith, A.D., Hartkens, T., Penney, G.P., Hall, W.A., Liu, H., Truwit, C.L., Gerritsen, F.A., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: A generic framework for non-rigid registration based on non-uniform multi-level free-form deformations. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
14. Glocker, B., Komodakis, N., Paragios, N., Tziritas, G., Navab, N.: Inter and intra-modal deformable registration: Continuous deformations meet efficient optimal linear programming. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Kerkrade, Netherlands (2007)
15. Komodakis, N., Tziritas, G., Paragios, N.: Fast, approximately optimal solutions for single and dynamic mrfs. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2007)
16. Gerig, G., Jomier, M., Chakos, M.: Valmet: A new validation tool for assessing and improving 3d object segmentations. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
17. Cheong, J., Faggian, N., Langs, G., Suter, D., Cicuttini, F.: A comparison of model-based methods for knee cartilage segmentation. In: Computer Vision Theory and Applications (2007)