Latent semantic analysis for german literature investigation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2206 LNCS, Issue , 2001, Pages 834-841

  Nakov, Preslav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SEMANTICS; COMPUTATION THEORY;

ANALYSIS OF TEXTUAL DATUM; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATION THEORY; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84883825572     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45493-4_83     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Berry M., Do T., O'Brien G., Krishna V., and Sowmini Varadhan, SVDPACKC (Version 1.0) User's Guide. April 1993.
2. Biber D.A typology of English Texts. Linguistics, 27, pp. 3-43. 1989.
3. Deerwester S., Dumais S., Furnas G., Laundauer T., Harshman R. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 41 (1990), pp. 391-47.
4. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications, Cairo, Egypt, 1998.
5. Dumais, S. T. (1993) LSI meets TREC: A status report. In: D. Harman (Ed.), The First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC1). National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-207, (pp. 137-152).
6. Dumais, S. T. (1994) Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and TREC-2. In: D. Harman (Ed.), The Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC2), National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-215, (pp. 105-116).
7. Dumais, S. T. (1995) Using LSI for information filtering: TREC-3 experiments. In: D. Harman (Ed.), The Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC3) National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, in press 1995.
8. Furnas G., Landauer T., Gomez L. and Dumais T. Statistical semantics: Analysis of the Potential Performance of Keyword Information Systems. Bell Syst.Tech.J., 62, Number 6, pp. 1753-1806, 1986.
9. Harman, D. How effective is suffixing? In Journal of The American Society of Information Science. Vol. 42, No 1. 1991.
10. Jiang, J. Using Latent Semantic Indexing for Data Mining. Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee, December 1997.
11. Karlgen J., Douglas C. Recognizing Text Genres with Simple metrics Using Discriminant Analysis. Proceedings of COLING 94, Kyoto, pp. 1071-1075.
12. Klare G.The Measurement of Readability. Ames: Iowa University Press. 1963.
13. Laudauer T., Foltz P., Laham D. Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, pp. 259-284.
14. Lorge I. The Lorge Formula for Estimating Difficulty of Reading Materials. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1959.
15. Losee R. Text Windows and Phrases Differing by discipline, Location in Document, and Syntactic Structure.Information Processing & Management 32(Nov): 747-67. 1996 (Pubitemid 126371204)
16. Nakov P. Getting Better Results with Latent Semantic Indexing. In Proceedings of the Students Presentations at ESSLLI-2000, pp. 156-166, Birmingham, UK, August 2000.
17. Nakov, P. Web-personalisation using extended Boolean operations with Latent Semantic Indexing. Proc. AIMSA-2000, Varna, Bulgaria, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1904, Springer 2000, pp. 189-198.
18. Nakov P. Latent Semantic Analysis of Textual Data. In Proceedings of CompSysTech'2000, Sofia, Bulgaria. June 2000.
19. Nakov P. Latent Semantic Analysis for Bulgarian literature. In Proceedings of Spring Conference of Bulgarian Mathematicians Union. Borovetz. Bulgaria. 2001.
20. Nakov P. Latent Semantic Analysis for Russian literature investigation. In Proceedings of the 120 years Bulgarian Naval Academy Conference. Varna. Bulgaria. 2001.
21. http://lsa.colorado.edu
22. http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/germ5/service/download/index.html
23. http://gutenberg.aol.de
24. http://www.phil.uni-erlangen.de/~p2gerlw/ressourc/archiv.html