Investigating the Promotion Possibility of No-Hunting Areas to the Protected Areas- a Case Study

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 577-585

  Jozi, Seyed Ali ^a   Sohrabi Balsini, Maryam ^b   Jamshidi, Arman ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Geographic information system; Iran; Kave Deh No hunting area; Land capability evaluation; Spatial multi criteria evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DELPHI ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GIS; LAND EVALUATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NATURE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; SOFTWARE;

IRAN; TEHRAN [IRAN];

EID: 84883821057     PISSN: 0255660X     EISSN: 09743006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-012-0250-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Azizur Rahman, M., Rusteberg, B., Gogu, R. C., Lobo Ferreira, J. P., & Sauter, M. (2012). A new spatial multi-criteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 61-75.
2. Carral, E., Bello, M., & Elvira López-Mosquera, M. (2011). GIS-based dairy-industry sludge application plan in Galiza (NW Spain). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 9, 27-32.
3. Carver, S. J. (1991). Intergrating multi- criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(3), 321-339.
4. Chan, S. L., & Huang, L. (2004). A system approach for the development of a sustainable community the application of the sensivity model (SM). Environmental Management Journal, 72(3), 133-147.
5. Chen, Y., & Paydar, Z. (2012). Evaluation of potential irrigation expansion using a spatial fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 38, 147-157.
6. Feldman, S. (1995). A prototype for pipeline routing using remotely sensed data and GIS analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment.
7. Geneletti, D. (2004). A GIS-based decision support system to identify nature conservation periorities in an alpine valley. Land Use Policy, 21(2), 149-160.
8. Harker, P. (1987). A incomplete pairwise in the analytical hierarchy process. Mathematical Modeling, 9, 837-848.
9. Harker, P. (1989). The art and science of decision making: The AHP. In B. L. Golden, E. A. Wasil, & P. T. Harker (Eds.), Chapter 2 of "analytical hierarchy process". New York: Springer.
10. Higgs, G. (2006). Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems in waste facility location to enhance public participation. Journal of Waste Management & Research.
11. Hill, M. J., Braaten, R., Simon, M., Brian, V., Lees, G., & Sharma, S. (2005). Multi-criteria decision analysis in spatial decision support: the ASSESS analytic hierarchy process and the role of quantitative methods and spatially explicit analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 955-976.
12. Laaribi, A., et al. (1996). A spatial decision aid: a multicriterion evalution approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 20(6), 351-366.
13. Lam, D., Leon, L., Hamilton, S., Crookshank, N., Bonin, D., & Swayn, D. (2004). Multimodel integration in a decision support system: a technical user interface approach for watershed and lake management scenarios. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19, 317-324.
14. Leroux Sh, J., Krawchuk, M. A., Schmiegelow, F., Cumming, S. G., Lisgo, K., Anderson, L. G., & Petkova, M. (2010). Global protected areas and IUCN designations: do the categories match the conditions? Biological Conservation, 143(3), 609-616.
15. Malczewski, S. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis (p. 392). New York: Wiley.
16. Matthies, M., Giupponi, C., & Ostendorf, B. (2007). Environmental decision support system: current issues, methods and tools. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22(2), 123-127.
17. Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., Darvishsefat, A. A., & Zienalyan, M. (2010). Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Management, 30(5), 912-920.
18. Pereira, M. C., & Duck Stein, L. (1993). A multiple criteria decision- making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(5), 407-424.
19. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority, resource allocation. USA: Rws Pub.
20. Saaty, T. L. (1988). Hierarchies and priorities. In T. L. Saaty & J. M. Alexander (Eds.), Chapter 8 of "the thinking with models: Mathematical models in the physical and social sciences" (pp. 148-155). Oxford: Pergammon Press.
21. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision making for leaders. USA: RWS Publications.
22. Saaty, T. L. (1994a). How to make a decision: the analytical hierarchy process. Interface, 24(G, S), 19-43.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1994b). Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 426-4470.
24. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Analytical network process. USA: RWS Publications.
25. Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchy to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(186), 229-237.
26. Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2010). Evaluation of management effectiveness in protected areas: methodologies and results. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(5), 377-382.
27. Store, R., & Kangas, J. (2001). Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modeling. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 79-93.
28. Svoray, T., Bar (Kutiel), P., & Bannet, T. (2005). Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: habitat heterogeneity model incorporated in a GIS using a multicriteria mechanism. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 72, 337-351.
29. Zucca, A., Sharifi, A. M., Fabbri, A. G. (2008). Application of spatial multi-criteria analysis to site selection for a local park: a case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 752-769.