Further Evidence On The Internal Validity Of The Early Legal Access Research Design

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 899-904

  Bailey, Martha J ^a,b   Guldi, Melanie ^c   Hershbein, Brad J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^d WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LEGAL ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ABORTION, LEGAL; FAMILY PLANNING POLICY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 84883755324     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.21716     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bailey, M. J. (2006). More power to the Pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women's lifecycle labor supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 289-320.
2. Bailey, M. J. (2009). More power to the Pill: Erratum and addendum. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from the University of Michigan: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~baileymj/Bailey_Erratum.pdf.
3. Bailey, M. J., Guldi, M., Davido, A., & Buzuvis, E. (2011). Early legal access: Laws and policies governing contraceptive access, 1960-1980. Working Paper. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from the University of Michigan: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~baileymj/ELA_laws.pdf.
4. Bailey, M. J., Hershbein, B. J., & Miller, A. R. (2012). The opt-in revolution? Contraception and the gender gap in wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 225-254.
5. Department of Health and Economic Welfare Center for Family Planning Program Development (Planned Parenthood-World Population). (1974). Family planning, contraception, and voluntary sterilization: An analysis of laws and policies in the United States, each State and jurisdiction (as of September 1971): A report of the National Center for Family Planning Services, Health Services and Mental Health Administration. Publication No. 74-16001. Rockville, MD: Author.
6. Edlund, L., & Machado, C. (2011, January). Pill power: The prequel. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5468. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from the SSRN Web site: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1756006.
7. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2002). The power of the Pill: Oral contraceptives and women's career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 730-770.
8. Jakubson, G. (1986). Measurement error in binary explanatory variables in panel data models: Why do cross section and panel estimates of the union wage effect differ?. No 589, Working Papers. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:589.
9. Joyce, T., Tan, R., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Abortion before & after Roe. Journal of Health Economics. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.05.004.
10. Myers, C. (2012). Power of the Pill or power of abortion? Re-examining the effects of young women's access to reproductive control. IZA Discussion Paper 6661. Retrieved June 11, 2013 from http://ftp.iza.org/dp6661.pdf.
11. Paul, E., Pilpel, H., & Wechsler, N. (1974). Pregnancy, teenagers and the law, 1974. Family Planning Perspectives, 6, 142-147.
12. Paul, E., Pilpel, H., & Wechsler, N. (1976). Pregnancy, teenagers and the law, 1976. Family Planning Perspectives, 8, 16-21.
13. Pilpel, H., & Wechsler, N. (1969). Birth control, teenagers and the law. Family Planning Perspectives, 1, 29-36.
14. Pilpel, H., & Wechsler, N. (1971). Birth control, teenagers and the law: A new look, 1971. Family Planning Perspectives, 3, 37-45.